Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 285–296 | Cite as

Death penalty sentiment in the United States

  • Hans Zeisel
  • Alec M. Gallup
Research Note


Pro-death penalty sentiment, at its all-time low in 1966 at 42% of the country's adult population, steadily rose to 71% in 1986. This average percentage varies widely for various subgroups of the population-as widely as between 43 and 93% at the extremes: political leanings, ethnic background, sex, and economic status are the main determinants. Death penalty sentiments are not of uniform strength: about one-third of the pro-death penalty population might give up their position if the alternative were life without parole and if they were convinced that the death penalty is not a deterrent. In the main, death penalty sentiment is not determined by utilitarian considerations but by moralistic ones, which in turn are part of the liberal-conservative dividing lines.

Key words

polls death penalty sentiment strength of sentiment utilitarian moralistic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bedau, H. A. (ed.) (1982).The Death Penalty in America, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Ellsworth P. C., and Ross, L. (1938). Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists.Crime Delinq. 29.Google Scholar
  3. Fox, J. A. (1989). Don't turn a death sentence into an orgy of vengeance.Newsday Jan. 27.Google Scholar
  4. Neapolitan, J. (1983). Support for and opposition to capital punishment: Some associated social-psychological factors.Crim. Just. Behav. 2: 145.Google Scholar
  5. Zeisel, H. (1968). Some data on juror attitudes towards capital punishment. Center for Studies in Criminal Justice, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Zeisel, H. (1982). The verdict of 5 out of 6 civil jurors: Constitutional problems.Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 141.Google Scholar
  7. Zeisel, H. (1985). InSay It with Figures, 6th ed., Harper and Row, 1985, Chap. 11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Zeisel
    • 1
  • Alec M. Gallup
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoIllinois
  2. 2.Gallup OrganizationPrincetonNew Jersey

Personalised recommendations