Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 347–360

Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in population pharmacokinetics

  • Mahir K. Al-Banna
  • Andrew W. Kelman
  • Brian Whiting


A computer simulation technique used to evaluate the influence of several aspects of sampling designs on the efficiency of population pharmacokinetic parameter estimation is described. Although the simulations are restricted to the one-compartment one-exponential model, they provide the basis for a discussion of the structural aspects involved in designing a population study. These aspects include number of subjects required, number of samples per subject, and timing of these samples. Parameter estimates obtained from different sampling schedules based on two- and three-point designs are evaluated in terms of accuracy and precision. These simulated data sets include noise terms for both inter- and intraindividual variability. The results show that the population fixed-effect parameters (mean clearance and mean volume of distribution) for this simple pharmacokinetic model are efficiently estimated for most of the sampling schedules when two or three points are used, but the random-effect parameters (describing inter- and intraindividual variability) are inaccurate and imprecise for most of the sampling schedules when only two points are used. This drawback was remedied by increasing the number of data points per individual to three.

Key words

computer simulation parameter estimation population pharmacokinetics experimental design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. Endrenyi. Design of experiments for estimating enzyme and phamiacokinetic experiments. In L. Endrenyi (ed.),Kinetic Data Analysis, Design and Analysis of Enzyme and Pharmacokinetic Experiments, Plenum Press, New York, 1981, pp. 137–167.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. M. Landaw. Optimal design for individual parameter estimation in pharmacokinetics. In M. Rowland, L. M. Sheiner, and J.-L. Steimer (eds.),Variability in Drug Therapy, Description, Estimation and Control, Raven Press, New York, 1985, 187–200.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. M. Landaw. Optimal experimental design for biologic compartmental systems with applications to pharmacokinetics. Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Z. D'Argenio. Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 9:739–756 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. J. Di Stefano III. Optimized blood sampling protocols and sequential design of kinetic experiments.Am. J. Physiol. 9:R259–265 (1981).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. J. Di Stefano III, T. K. Malone, and M. Jang. Comprehensive kinetics of thyroxine (T4) distribution and metabolism in blood and tissue pools of the rat from only six blood samples: Dominance of large, slowly exchanging tissue pools.Endocrinology 111:108–117 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Cobelli, J. J. Di Stefano III, L. Okalicsanij, and A. Ruggeri. Minimal sampling schedules for identification of dynamic models of metabolic systems of clinical interest: Case studies for two linear function tests.Math. Biosci. 63:173–186 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. J. Di Stefano III. Algorithms, software and sequential optimal sampling schedule designs for pharmacokinetic and physiologic experiments.Math. Comput. Simulation 24:531–534 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Mori and J. J. Di Stefano III. Optimal nonuniform sampling interval and test-input design for identification of physiological systems from very limited data.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 24:893–900 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters III. Monoexponential model: Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 11:303–319 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. J. Westlake. Use of statistical methods in evaluation ofin vivo performance of dosage forms.J. Pharm. Sci. 62:1579–1589 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring, and A. J. McEwen.A User's Manual for NONLIN and Associated Programs, Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI., 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. E. P. Box and H. L. Lucas. Design of experiments in nonlinear situations.Biometrika 46:77–90 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. L. Beal and L. B. Sheiner.NONMEM Users Guide, Parts I–VI, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, 1979–1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahir K. Al-Banna
    • 1
  • Andrew W. Kelman
    • 2
  • Brian Whiting
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsUniversity of Glasgow, Stobhiil General HospitalGlasgowScotland
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Physics & BioengineeringWest of Scotland Health BoardsGlasgowScotland
  3. 3.BIOSBagshotEngland

Personalised recommendations