Relationship between train-of-four ratio and first-twitch depression during neuromuscular blockade: A pharmacokinetic/dynamic explanation
- 100 Downloads
Fade, as measured by train-of-four, lags behind twitch depression during the initial phase of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade, i.e., the ratio of the fourth to first twitch height in a train (T4/T1is greater at the onset of the block than during spontaneous recovery for the same level of first twitch depression. We believe that these data can be explained by picturing the muscle as having localized regions that respond much more slowly than the rest, leading to a delay in drug effect in that area, especially when the drug concentration rises rapidly as during bolus administration. This was modeled by computer as a muscle of 15 compartments distributed in a log-normal fashion according to equilibration rate. Experimental data consisting of the time course of first twitch and train-of-four ratio were fitted by nonlinear regression to the model. A good fit was obtained with a median equilibration time t1/2of 3.3 min and a standard deviation of 2.1. The difference between train-of-four during onset and regression of block at the same level of first twitch depression was reproduced.
Key wordsneuromuscular relaxants pancuronium pharmacokinetics models computers train-of-four stimulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling.Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986, pp. 615–688.Google Scholar
- 11.R. C. Weast and M. J. Astle (eds.).CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st ed., CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1980, p. F-62.Google Scholar
- 12.R. Myrhage and O. Hudlicka. The microvascular bed and capillar surface area in rat extensor hallucis proprius muscle. In J. Grayson and W. Zingg (eds.),Microcirculation, Vol 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1976, p. 369.Google Scholar
- 13.J. J. Smith and J. P. Kampine.Circulatory Physiology—The Essentials, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1984, pp. 128–132.Google Scholar