Advertisement

Pharmacokinetic studies on the selectiveβ1-receptor antagonist metoprolol in man

  • Carl G. Regårdh
  • Karl O. Borg
  • Rustan Johansson
  • Gillis Johnsson
  • Lars Palmer
Article

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of3H-metoprolol, a new selective β1-receptor antagonist, have been studied in healthy volunteers by following the plasma concentrations and the urinary excretion of the unchanged compound and its total radioactive metabolites after oral and intravenous administration. The compound was rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration, and about 40% of the dose reached the systemic circulation. The estimated half-life of the absorption process was 10 min. Metoprolol was extensively distributed to extravascular tissues, with the half-life of the distribution phase close to 12 min. About 95% of the dose was excreted in the urine within 72 hr, mainly in metabolized form. The elimination halflife of the compound was close to 3 hr as was also the half-life of the total metabolites after oral administration. After intravenous administration, the elimination half-life of the metabolites was raised to 5 hr, indicating that the route of administra tion might influence the metabolic pathways of the parent compound.

Key words

metoprolol β-receptor antagonist pharmacokinetics disposition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Åblad, E. Carlsson, and L. Ek. Pharmacologic studies of two new cardioselective adrenergic beta-receptor antagonists.Life Sci. 12: 107–119 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Rowland. Influence of route of administration on drug availability.J. Pharm. Sci. 61: 70–74 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. J. Davies and P. Rabinowitz.Numerical Integration, Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass., 1967, p. 22.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. G. Wagner.Biopharmaceutics and Relevant Pharmacokinetics, Drug Intelligence Publications, Hamilton, Ill., 1971, p. 298.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. R. Glass. A technique for fitting nonlinear models to biological data.Ecology 48: 1010–1012 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. S. Riggs.The Mathematical Approach to Physiological Problems, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970, p. 208.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. C. K. Loo and S. Riegelman. Assessment of pharmacokinetic constants from postinfusion blood curves obtained after i.v. infusion.J. Pharm. Sci. 59: 53–55 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Gibaldi, R. Nagashima, and G. Levy. Relationship between drug concentration in plasma or serum and amount of drug in the body.J. Pharm. Sci. 58: 193–197 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. G. Wagner and E. Nelson. Per cent absorbed time plots derived from blood level and/or urinary excretion data.J. Pharm. Sci. 52: 610–611 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. C. K. Loo and S. Riegelman. New method for calculating the intrinsic absorption rate of drugs.J. Pharm. Sci. 57: 918–928 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Perrier, M. Gibaldi, and R. N. Boyes. Prediction of systemic availability from plasmalevel data after oral drug administration.J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 25: 256–257 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. G. Shand and R. E. Rangno. The disposition of propranolol. I. Elimination during absorption in man.Pharmacology 7: 159–168 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Gibaldi, R. N. Boyes, and S. Feldman. Influence of first-pass effect on availability of drugs on oral administration.J. Pharm. Sci. 60: 1338–1340 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. E. Bradely. InHandbook of Physiology, Sect. II, Vol. II, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1963, p. 1387.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Chulski, R. H. Johnsson, C. A. Schlagel, and J. G. Wagner. Direct proportionality of urinary excretion rate and serum level of tetracycline in human subjects.Nature (Lond.) 198: 450–453 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. G. Wagner. Pharmacokinetics: Notes supplied by John G. Wagner, Ph.D., J. M. Richards Laboratory, Grosse Point Park, Mich., 1969, p. 93.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. G. Wagner.Biopharmaceutics and Relevant Pharmacokinetics, Drug Intelligence Publications, Hamilton, Ill., 1971, p. 261.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. A. Kaplan, M. Lewis, M. A. Schwartz, E. Postma, S. Cotler, C. W. Abruzzo, T. L. Lee, and R. E. Weinfeld. Pharmacokinetic model for chlordiazepoxide-HCl in the dog.J. Pharm. Sci. 59: 1569–1574 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. J. O'Reilly. Pharmacokinetics in drug metabolism and toxicology.Canad. J. Pharm. Sci. 7: 66–77 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl G. Regårdh
    • 1
  • Karl O. Borg
    • 1
  • Rustan Johansson
    • 2
  • Gillis Johnsson
    • 1
  • Lars Palmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Laboratories, AB Hässle, FackMölndal 1Sweden
  2. 2.Apoteket PilenLillhagen's HospitalHisings-Backa 3Sweden

Personalised recommendations