Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Regulatory aspects of fusion power-lessons from JET experience

  • 22 Accesses


The first tritium experiment in the JET machine was carried out in November 1991. A number of different regulatory approvals were required in order to proceed with the experiment. These included radioactive discharge authorization, approval of the safety justification and endorsement of the arrangements for accounting for tritium. Preparation for the full D-T phase of JET planned for 1996 was underway prior to the experiment and has continued subsequently. Up to 90 g of tritium will be used in the full D-T phase and JET has obtained authorization for holding this amount on site and for related radioactive discharges. Safety submissions for tritium operation of the JET machine and tritium plant have been made. The paper highlights the regulatory issues involved in determining the appropriate site inventory limit. It emphasizes the importance of establishing a well-founded justification in the case for radioactive discharge authorizations and the necessity of matching the form of the compliance monitoring employed to the predicted mix of nuclides discharged. The accident analysis criteria and routine dose limits used at JET are discussed in relation to the tightening of regulatory requirements, together with QA and design standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    R. Haangeet al. (1988). General Overview of the Active Gas Handling System at JET, Proc. 3rd Topical Meeting on Tritium Technology in Fission, Fusion and Isotope Application, Toronto.

  2. 2.

    Health & Safety Executive, Safety Assessment Principles for Nuclear Plants, HMSO, October 1992.

  3. 3.

    A. C. Bellet al. (1992). Safety aspects and approvals of the first JET tritium experiment.Fusion Engineering Design 19, 169–178.

  4. 4.

    S. B. Russell and G. L. Ogram (1991). ETMOD: A New Environmental Tritium Model, 4th Topical Meeting on Tritium Technology in Fission, Fusion and Isotopic Applications, Albuquerque.

  5. 5.

    C. J. Caldwell-Nicholset al. (1992). Radiation monitoring, environmental and health physics aspects during the first JET tritium experiment.Fusion Engineering Design 19, September.

  6. 6.

    Y Belotet al. (1991). Determination of tritiated formaldehyde in effluents for tritium facilities.Fusion Technol. 21, 556–559.

  7. 7.

    NRPB, Board Statement on Emergency Reference Levels, NRPB Documents, Vol. 1 No. 4 1990.

  8. 8.

    G. A. M. Webb (1989). Statement of Evidence to Hinkley Point C Inquiry, NRPB-M166, March.

  9. 9.

    Private communication from MAFF, December 1991.

  10. 10.

    W. Raskob (1990). UFOTRI, Program for Assessing the Off-Site Consequences from Accidental Tritium Releases, KFK 4605, July.

  11. 11.

    I. R. Brearley (1986). TRIDOS: A Dynamic Model for the Transfer of Tritium in the Environment. Madrid Seminar, September.

  12. 12.

    A. T. Peacocket al. (1992). Tritium Retention in First Wall Material at JET After the First Tritium Experiment (FTE) SOFT.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, A.C. Regulatory aspects of fusion power-lessons from JET experience. J Fusion Energ 12, 189–194 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059377

Download citation


  • Tritium
  • Analysis Criterion
  • Dose Limit
  • Regulatory Requirement
  • Design Standard