Fertilizer research

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 81–91 | Cite as

Development and evaluation of an improved soil test for phosphorus: 1. The influence of phosphorus fertilizer solubility and soil properties on the extractability of soil P

  • S. Saggar
  • M. J. Hedley
  • R. E. White
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The objective of this work was to develop and evaluate a soil test suitable for estimating the phosphorus status of soils whether they were fertilized with soluble or sparingly soluble P fertilizers or both. Four New Zealand soils of contrasting P sorption capacity and exchangeable Ca content were incubated alone or with monocalcium phosphate (MCP), reactive North Carolina (NC) phosphate rock or unreactive Florida (FRD) rock, at 240 mg P kg−1 soil, to allow the P sources of different solubilities to react with each soil and provide soil samples containing different amounts of extractable P, Ca and residual phosphate rock. The phosphorus in the incubated soils was fractionated into alkali soluble and acid soluble P fractions using a sequential extraction procedure to assess the extent of phosphate rock dissolution. Eight soil P tests [three moderately alkaline — Olsen (0.5M NaHCO3) modified Olsen (pretreatment with 1M NaCl) and Colwell; three acid tests — Bray 1, modified Bray 1 and Truog; and two resin tests — bicarbonate anion exchange resin (AER) and combined AER plus sodium cation exchange resin (CER)] were assessed in their ability to extract P from the incubated soils.

The 0.5M NaHCO3 based alkaline tests could not differentiate between the Control and FRD treatments in any soil nor between the Control, NC and FRD treatments in the high P sorption soils. The acid extractants appeared to be affected by the P sorption capacity of the soil probably because of reabsorption of dissolved P in the acid medium. The AER test gave results similar to Olsen. Only the combined AER + CER test extracted P in amounts related to the solubility of the P sources incubated with each soil. Furthermore, when soil samples were “spiked” with FRD and NC and extracted immediately, the P extracted by the AER + CER test, over and above the control soils, increased with the amount and chemical reactivity of the rocks. There was no extraction of rock P by any of the alkaline extractions.

Increases in the amounts of P extracted (ΔP) by each soil test from the fertilized soils, over and above the control soils were compared with the amounts ofP dissolved from the fertilizers during incubation (measured by P fractionation). Soil P sorption capacity had least influence on the amounts of P extracted by the AER + CER and Colwell tests. However, the Colwell test was unable to differentiate between all P sources in all four soils and suffered from the disadvantage of producing coloured extracts. The AER + CER test appeared to have the potential to assess the available P status of soils better than the other tests used because of its ability to extract a representative portion of residual PR (in accordance with the amount and reactivity) and dissolved P, and thus to differentiate between fertilizer treatments in all four soils.

Key words

Anion exchange resin Bray 1 cation exchange resin Colwell exchangeable Ca P dissolution P fractionation P sorption capacity P tests Phosphate rocks Olsen Truog 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amer F, Bouldin DR, Black CA and Duke FR (1955) Characterization of soil phosphorus by anion exchange resin adsorption and P32 equilibration. Plant and Soil 6: 391–408Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bache BW and Ireland C (1980) Desorption of phosphate from soils using anion exchange resins. Soil Sci 31: 297–306Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolan NS and Hedley MJ (1989) Dissolution of phosphate rocks in soils I. Evaluation of extraction methods for the measurement of phosphate rock dissolution. Fert Res 19: 65–75Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolan NS, White RE and Hedley MJ (1990) A review of the use of phosphate rocks as fertilizers for direct application in Australia and New Zealand. Aust J Exp Agric 30: 297–313Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolland MDA, Bowden JW, D'Antuono MF and Gilkes RJ (1984) The current and residual value of superphosphate, Christmas Island C-grade ore and calciphos as fertilizers for a subterranean clover pasture. Fert Res 5: 335–354Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bowman RA, Olsen SR and Watanabe FS (1978) Greenhouse evaluation of residual phosphate by four phosphorus methods in neutral and calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42: 451–454Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bray RH and Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59: 39–45Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colwell JD (1963) The optimization of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3: 190–197.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooke IJ and Hislop J (1963) Use of anion exchange resin for the assessment of available soil phosphate. Soil Sci 96: 308–312Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cornforth IS, Smith GS and Fox RL (1983) Phosphate extractability and availability to plants in phosphate rock treated soils. NZ J Expt Agric 11: 243–246Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curtin D, Syers JK and Smillie GW (1987) The importance of exchangeable cations and resin sink characteristics in the release of soil phosphorus. Soil Sci 38: 711–716.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grigg JL and Crouchley G (1980) Relative efficiency of phosphate fertilizers in pasture topdressing II on a Kokotau silt loam. NZ J Agric Res 23: 49–65Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB and Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 70–976Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes JC and Gilkes RJ (1984) The effect of chemical extractant on the estimation of rock phosphate fertilizer dissolution. Aust J Soil Res. 22: 475–481Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson ML (1965) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., U.S.A. 134–182 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    John MK (1970) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant material with ascorbic acid. Soil Sci. 109: 214–220Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamprath EJ and Watson ME (1980) Conventional soil and tissue tests for assessing the phosphorus status of soil. In: Khasawneh, EC Sample and EJ Kamprath (eds). The role of phosphorus in agriculture, pp 433–468. Am Soc Agron: Madison, Wis, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kirk GJD and Nye PH (1986) A simple model for predicting the rates of dissolution of sparingly soluble calcium phosphate in soil. I. The basic model. J Soil Sci 37: 529–540Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lynch PB and Davies EB (1963) Topdressing of grassland with phosphate and lime. III Residual effects. NZ J Agric Res 7: 299–338Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mackay AD, Syers JK, Gregg PEH and Tillman RW (1984) A comparison of 3 soil-testing procedures for estimating the plant availability of phosphorus in soils receiving either superphosphate or phosphate rock. NZ J Agric Res 27: 231–245Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Menon RG, Hammond LL and Sissingh HA (1989) Determination of plant-available phosphorus by the iron oxide-impregnated paper (Pi) soil test. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53: 110–115Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murphy J and Riley JR (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27: 31–36Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS and Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dept Agric Circ No 939: 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Quin BF, Dyson CB and Chiao YS (1987) Agronomic and economic aspects of the use of phosphate rocks for pasture-development of a predictive model. In: RE White and LD Currie (eds). The use of reactive phosphate rocks and their derivatives as fertilizers. Occasional Report No. 1 pp 147–163. Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University: Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quin BF, Dyson CB, Shannon PD, O'Connor MB, Percival N, Roberts A, Smith G, Nguyen L, Williams P and Risk W (1985) The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries ‘National Series’ forms of phosphate trials. In: Proceedings of the 20th Technical Conference New Zealand Fertilizer Manufacturer's Research Association, Auckland pp 604–628Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajan SSS (1987) Phosphate rock and phosphate/sulphur granules as phosphate fertilizers and their dissolution in soil. Fert Res 11: 43–60Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryden JC and Syers JK (1977) Origin of labile phosphate pool in soils. Soil Sci 123: 353–361Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robinson JS and Syers JK (1990) A critical evaluation of factors influencing the dissolution of Gafsa phosphate rock. J Soil Sc. 41: 597–605Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saggar S, Hedley MJ and White RE (1990) A simplified resin membrane technique for extracting phosphorus from soils. Fert Res 24: 173–180Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saggar S, Hedley MJ, White RE, Gregg PEH, Perrott KW and Cornforth IS (1992) Development and evaluation of an improved soil test for phosphorus 2: Comparison of the Olsen and a mixed cation-anion exchange resin tests for predicting the yield of ryegrass grown in pots. Fert Res (in press)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saunders WMH, Sherrell CG and Gravell IM (1987) A new approach to the interpretation of soil tests for phosphate response by grazed pasture. NZ J Agric Res 30: 67–77Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sherrell CG (1970) Comparison of chemical extraction methods for the determination of ‘available’ phosphate in soils. 1. Correlation between methods and yield and phosphorus uptake by white clover grown on 16 North Island soils in the glasshouse. NZ J Agric Res 13: 481–493Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sibbesen E (1977) A simple ion exchange resin procedure for extracting plant-available elements from soil. Plant and Soil 46: 665–669Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sibbesen E (1978) An investigation of the anion exchange resin method for soil phosphate extraction. Plant and Soil 50: 305–321Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sibbesen E (1983) Phosphate soil tests and their suitability to assess the phosphate status of soil. J Sci Food Agric 34: 1368–1374Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smyth TJ and Sanchez PA (1982) Phosphate rock dissolution and availability in Cerrado soils as affected by phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 339–345Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sorn-srivichai P, Tillman RW, Syers JK and Cornforth IS (1984) The effect of soil pH on Olsen bicarbonate phosphate values. J Sci Food Agric 35: 257–264Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tambunan D, Hedley, MJ, Bolan NS and Turner MA (1992) A comparison of sequential extraction procedures for measuring phosphate rock residues in soils. Fert Res (submitted)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Truog E (1930) The determination of readily available phosphorus in soils. J Am Soc Agron 22: 874–882Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    White RE, Hedley MJ, Bolan NS and Gregg PEH (1989) Recent developments in the use of phosphate fertilizers on New Zealand pastures. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 2: 26–32Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    White RE (1988) Soil-plant-fertilizer interactions: new developments involving phosphate. NZ Agric Sci 22: 58–62Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Saggar
    • 1
  • M. J. Hedley
    • 1
  • R. E. White
    • 1
  1. 1.Fertilizer and Lime Research CentreMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations