Effect of catalyst on regioselectivity and vinyl/H exchange on silicon in the hydrosilylation of vinyl-siloxanes by T8 hydrogen silsesquioxane
- 91 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
We have recently reported the synthesis of octopus molecules of defined shape and size with molecular weights well into the thousands. These octopus molecules were made by placing eight pendant groups symmetrically about a central silsesquioxane core via the H2PtCl6 catalyzed hydrosilylation of 1-alkenes as well as vinyl- and allyl-siloxanes by T8 hydrogen silsesquioxane, (HSiO32)8. The chemistry of addition was studied and it was found that while the addition of the 1-alkenes to T8 was regioprecise with only α-addition being observed, both α- and β-addition occurred with vinyl-siloxane. In addition, H-vinyl exchange on silicon was observed to occur with addition of vinyl-siloxane to T8. In the current studies, the effect of the hydrosilylation catalyst. homogeneous and heterogeneous, on the regioselectivity of addition and on the extent of exchange on silicon was evaluated. It was found that the heterogeneous catalysts Pt−C, sulfided Pt−C, and Rh−C required higher temperature and longer times to get complete reaction than the homogeneous catalysts. H2PtCl6 and the tetramethyldivinyldisiloxane complex of Pt. Pd supported catalysts were not effective catalysts for this hydrosilylation. The extent of exchange on silicon and the degree of the second mode of addition occurring were higher with the heterogenous catalysts and may be a result of the higher reaction temperatures.
Key Words
Octopus macromonomer silsesquioxane hydrosilylationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.F. Vogtle and E. Weber,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 13, 814 (1974).Google Scholar
- 2.D. MacNicol and D. Wilson,J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Common. 494 (1976).Google Scholar
- 3.R. Fornasier, F. Montanari, G. Podda, and P. Tundo,Tetrahedron Lett. 17, 1381 (1976).Google Scholar
- 4.V. Bocchi, D. Foina, A. Pochini, and R. Ungaro,Tetrahedron 38, 373 (1982).Google Scholar
- 5.R. Ungaro, A. Pochino, G. D. Andreetti, and F. Ugozzoli,J. Inclusion Phenom. 3, 409 (1985).Google Scholar
- 6.H. Taniguchi and E. Nomura.Chem. Lett. 1773 (1988).Google Scholar
- 7.K. L. Wooley, C. J. Hawker, and J. M. J. Frecket,J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1059 (1991).Google Scholar
- 8.G. R. Newkome, A. Nayak, R. K. Behera, C. N. Moorefield, and G. R. Baker,J. Org. Chem. 57, 358 (1992) and references therein.Google Scholar
- 9.H. Uchida, Y. Kabe, K. Yoshino, A. Kawamata, T. Tsumuraya, and S. Masamune,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 7077 (1990).Google Scholar
- 10.G. R. Newkome, C. N. Moorefield, G. R. Baker, A. L. Johnson, and R. K. Behera,Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 30, 1176 (1991).Google Scholar
- 11.A. R. Bassindale and T. E. Gentle,J. Mater. Chem. 3, 1319 (1993).Google Scholar
- 12.J. L. Speir, inAdvances in Organometallic Chemistry (Academic Press, New York, 1979), Vol. 17, p. 407.Google Scholar
- 13.C. Pitt and K. Skillern,J. Organometal. Chem. 7, 525–528 (1967).Google Scholar
- 14.V. M. Vdovin and A. D. Petrov,Zh. Obshch. Khim. 30, 838 (1960).Google Scholar
- 15.B. Marciniec, J. Bulinski, and W. Urbaniak,Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 12, 139 (1982).Google Scholar
- 16.German Patent 2245187.Google Scholar
- 17.S. Nozakura,Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 29, 660 (1956).Google Scholar
- 18.V. D. Sheludyakov, V. I. Zhun, S. D. Vlaskenko, V. N. Bochkarev, T. F. Slyusarenko, A. V. Kisin, V. M. Nosova, G. N. Turkel'Taub, and E. A. Chernyshev,Zh. Obshch. Khim. 51, 2022 (1981).Google Scholar
- 19.B. Marciniec, E. Mackowska, J. Gulinski, and W. Urbaniak,Anorg. Allg. Chem. 529, 222 (1985).Google Scholar
- 20.P. A. Agaskar,Inorg. Chem. 30, 2707 (1991).Google Scholar
- 21.J. Saam, D. Gordon, and S. Lindsey,Macromolecules 3, 1 (1970).Google Scholar
- 22.G. Cameron and S. Chisholm,Polymer 26, 437 (1985).Google Scholar
- 23.Y. Kawakami and Y. Yamashita,ACS Symp. Ser. 286, 245 (1985).Google Scholar
- 24.Y. Tezuka, A. Fukushima, and K. Imai,Macromol. Chem. 186, 685 (1985).Google Scholar