Skip to main content
Log in

Response of common grackles to dietary concentrations of four organophosphate pesticides

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral and physiological responses of common grackles to dietary concentrations of dicrotophos, fenitrothion, fenthion, and methyl parathion suggest mortality was largely due to pesticide-induced anorexia. Mortality was dose related, though consumption of treated diets was reduced such that birds on different geometrically arranged concentrations of the same pesticide ingested about the same amount of toxicant. Grackles that died lost an average of 28 to 36% of their initial body weight; visible fat was absent and muscle tissue was reduced on the sternum. Mortality of birds exposed to dicrotophos increased between May and August, although chemical intake remained relatively constant, and was associated with a natural decrease in fat and flesh condition in response to increased ambient temperatures and post-nuptial molt. Food consumption in songbirds exposed to organophosphates may be reduced significantly up to 12 hr after exposure ceases because of an unknown effect of these chemicals on their feeding behavior, but not repellency. The results caution against using median lethal dietary concentrations for other than ranking chemicals based on their relative toxicity, particularly in establishing safe environmental levels, and suggest that anorexia and physiological condition may be important factors in mortality of wild birds exposed to organophosphates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, O. L., Jr.: Families of Birds. New York: Golden Press (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, J.: Effects of acephate and Sevin® on forest birds. J. Wildl. Manage.43, 544 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brust, R. A., S. Miyazaki, and G. C. Hodgson: Effect of Dursban® in the drinking water of chicks. J. Econ. Entomol.64, 1179(1971).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dieter, M. P., and J. L. Ludke: Studies on combined effects of organophosphates and heavy metals in birds. I. Plasma and brain cholinesterase in coturnix quail fed methyl mercury and orally dosed with parathion. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.13, 257 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. B.: Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics11, 1 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellman, G. L., K. D. Courtney, V. Andreas, Jr., and R. M. Featherstone: A new rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol.7, 88 (1961).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finley, R. B., Jr.: Adverse effects on birds of phosphamidon applied to a Montana forest. J. Wildl. Manage.29, 580 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowle, D. C: Effects of phosphamidon on forest birds in New Brunswick. Canadian Wildlife Service Report No.16, Ottawa, Canada (1972).

  • Heath, R. G., and L. F. Stickel: Protocol for testing the acute and relative toxicity of pesticides to penned birds. In The effects of pesticides on fish and wildlife. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular226, 18 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. F.: Toxicity of selected mosquito larvicides to some common avian species. J. Wildl. Manage.35, 757 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Avoidance of lethal dietary concentrations of insecticide by house sparrows. J. Wildl. Manage.36, 635 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Cholinesterase activity in Japanese quail dusted with carbaryl. Lab. Anim. Sci.29, 349 (1979).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. F., R. G. Heath, J. W. Spann, and J. D. Williams: Lethal dietary toxicities of environmental pollutants to birds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report—Wildlife191 (1975).

  • Keith, J. O., and M. S. Mulla: Relative toxicity of five organophosphorus mosquito larvicides to mallard ducks. J. Wildl. Manage.30, 553 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Y.: Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replication. Biometrics12, 307 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield, J. T., Jr., and F. Wilcoxon: A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Pharmacol. and Exp. Therapeutics96, 99 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludke, J. L., E. F. Hill, and M. P. Dieter: Cholinesteratse (ChE) response and related mortality among birds fed ChE inhibitors. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.3, 1 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. M.: The effect of phosphamidon on bird populations in jack pine stands in Quebec. Can. Field Nat.81, 102 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, K. N., Y. P. Beri, S. S. Misra, and A. Phokela: Physiological effects of malathion on the house sparrow. Indian J. Exp. Biol.5, 219 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Climatological data. Maryland and Delaware82 (1978).

  • Pearce, P. A.: Side effects of forest spraying in New Brunswick. N. Am. Wildl. Conf.36, 263 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillmore, R. E., E. L. Flickinger, and M. L. Richmond: Forest spraying of Zectran® and its safety to wildlife. J. Forestry69, 721 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, G. G., and P. Ward: The effects of small applications of an organophosphorus poison, fenthion on the weaver-birdQuelea quelea. Pest. Sci.3, 197 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauen, V. H. M., H. Schriewer, B. Gebauer, M. Abu Tair, N. Ruther, and L. G. The: Multivariate analyse experimenteller Leberschadigungen: Normal parameter des Rattenserums. Arzneim-Forsch23, 108 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, D. W.: Field and laboratory studies involving some of the effects of parathion on birds. M.S. thesis, University of Nevada, Reno (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabloom, R. W., G. L. Pearson, L. W. Oring, and J. R. Reilly: An incident of fenthion mosquito control and subsequent avian mortality. J. Wildl. Diseases9, 18 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran: Statistical methods Ames: Iowa State University Press (1967).

  • Stevenson, H. M.: Florida region: Pesticides. Am. Birds26, 593 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, W. H.: Effects on wildlife of newer pesticides and other pollutants. Proc. Ann. Conf. West. Assoc. Game Fish Comm.53, 484 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. B.: Poisoning of wild birds by organophosphate and carbamate pesticides. N.Y. Fish Game J.26, 37 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H.: An electrophoretic study of some hydrolases from fat-body and haemolymph of adult cave-roachPycnoscelus striatus (Kirby) using selective substrates and inhibitors. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.52C, 127 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior: Effects of Bidrin® on rangeland wildlife. In Wildlife research-problems, programs, progress 1967. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Resource Publication74, 55 (1969).

  • Villeneuve, D. C., M. J. van Logten, E. M. den Tonkelaar, A. G. Rauws, R. Kroes, and G. J. van Esch: The combined effect of food restriction and parathion exposure in rats. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.7, 37 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, A.: The role of the pituitary, fat deposition, and body weight in bird migration. Condor47, 95 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grue, C.E. Response of common grackles to dietary concentrations of four organophosphate pesticides. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 11, 617–626 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056371

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056371

Keywords

Navigation