Source of nomination (prosecution, defense, judge) was varied in a fictional not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) case distributed to 180 community forensic evaluators in a state employing theM'Naghten rule. Differences among examiners by appointment for the final NGRI judgment was not significant; interrater reliability for psychopathological symptomatology was .73. Discriminant analysis revealed significant differences in the decision-making process between evaluators recommending sanity and those endorsing insanity, as well as between psychiatrists and psychologists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
American Psychiatric Association (1984).Issues in forensic psychiatry: Insanity defense, hospitalization of adults, model civil commitment law, sentencing process and child custody consultation. Washington, DC: Author.
Bazelon, D. J. (1974). Psychiatrists and the adversary process.Scientific American, 230, 8–22.
Blau, T. H. (1984).The psychologist as expert witness. New York: Wiley.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
Dillman, D. A. (1978).Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
Exner, J. E. (1986).The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
Eysenck, H. J., Wakefield, J. A., Jr., & Friedman, A. F. (1983). Diagnosis and clinical assessment: The DSM-III.Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 167–193.
Grove, W. M., Andreasen, N. C., McDonald-Scott, P., Keller, M. B., & Shapiro, R. W. (1981). Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis.Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 408–413.
Hain, J. D. (1964). The Bender-Gestalt Test: A scoring method for identifying brain damage.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 34–42.
Homant, R. J., & Kennedy, D. B. (1987). Subjective factors in the judgment of insanity.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 38–61.
Homant, R. J., & Kennedy, D. B. (1985). Determinants of expert witnesses' opinions in insanity defense cases. In S. M. Talarico (Ed.),Courts and criminal justice: Emerging issues. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Hutt, M. L. (1969).The Hutt adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt test (2nd ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1979). External validity of research in legal psychology.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 39–70.
Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1981). A critique of theory and method in social-psychological approaches to legal issues. In B. D. Sales (Ed.),Perspectives in law and psychology: The trial process (pp. 481–497). New York: Plenum.
Menninger, K. (1966).The crime of punishment. New York: Viking.
Otto, R. K. (1986). Bias and expert testimony of mental health professionals. Unpublished dissertation. Florida State University.
Robinson, D. N. (1982, June 23). TheHinckley decision: Psychiatry in court.Wall Street Journal, 5.
Szasz, T. S. (1960). The myth of mental illness.American Psychologist, 15, 113–118.
Sidley, N. (1980). President's message: The ethics of forensic psychiatry.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 8, iv-vii.
Spitzer, R. L., & Fleiss, J. L. (1974). A reanalysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis.American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 341–347.
Ziskin, J. (1975).Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony. Beverly Hills, California: Law and Psychology Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Beckham, J.C., Annis, L.V. & Gustafson, D.J. Decision making and examiner bias in forensic expert recommendations for not guilty by reason of insanity. Law Hum Behav 13, 79–87 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056164
- Decision Making
- Social Psychology
- Discriminant Analysis
- Interrater Reliability
- Expert Recommendation