Mercury in soil: A method for assessing acceptable limits

  • N. W. Revis
  • T. R. Osborne
  • G. Holdsworth
  • C. Hadden
Article

Abstract

Acceptable limits for mercury in soil were determined at a site with mercury contamination after measuring the soil concentration of total mercury, the species of mercury, and the intestinal absorption of mercuric sulfide by mice. The total concentration of mercury at this site ranged from 0.5 to 3,000 ppm. Of the total mercury present, 88% was identified as mercuric sulfide, 0.01% as methyl mercury, and 7% as elemental mercury. Intestinal absorption studies in mice following the intubation of203mercuric sulfide showed that 0.4% of the intubated dose was absorbed. We estimated an acceptable limit for mercury in soil at this site based on results of this study, on reports in the literature on the intestinal and pulmonary absorption of mercury species from air, water and food; and on the normal intake of total mercury in humans reported by the World Health Organization. Based on reports in the literature and results from the present studies, we suggest an acceptable limit for mercury in soil (at this site) to be 722 ppm. With a safety factor of 10 this limit would be reduced to 72 ppm.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barkay T, Olson BH (1986) Phenotypic and genotypic adaptation of aerobic heterotrophic sediment bacterial communities to mercury stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:403–438Google Scholar
  2. Bashor BS, Turri PA (1986) A method for determining an allowable concentration of mercury in soil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 15:435–438Google Scholar
  3. Battelle (1983) Technical approach to pathways analysis-garden soil to man. Topical report, volume 2. Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarkson TW, Shapiro RE (1971) The absorption of mercury from food, its significance and new method of removing mercury from the body. In Mercury in Man's Environment, Proc Royal Soc Canadian Symp 124Google Scholar
  5. Compeau GC, Bartha R (1985) Sulfate-reducing bacteria: Principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:498–502Google Scholar
  6. Dencker I, Schultz A (1971) Mercury content in food. Lakartidninger 68:4031–4039Google Scholar
  7. D'Itri FM (1971) The environmental mercury problem. A report to the Michigan House of Representatives resulting from House Resolution 424 Great Lakes Contamination (Mercury) CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldman C (1974) Perchloric acid procedure for wet-ashing organics for the determination of mercury (and other metals). Anal Chem 46:1606–1609Google Scholar
  9. Ford KL, Gruba P (1984) Health risk assessments for contaminated soils. In management of uncontrolled hazardous waste site. Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, pp 230–235Google Scholar
  10. Friberg L, Vostal J (1972) Mercury in the environment. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH, pp 1–186Google Scholar
  11. Furutani A, Rudd JWM (1980) Measurement of mercury methylation in lake water and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 40:770–776Google Scholar
  12. Glew DN, Hames DA (1971) Aqueous nonelectrolyte solutions. Part X, Mercury solubility in water. Can J Chem 49:1114–1117Google Scholar
  13. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1975) Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. ICRP Publication No. 2, Pergamon Press, NY, p 397Google Scholar
  14. Jernelov A (1970) Release of methylmercury from sediments with layers containing inorganic mercury at different depths. Limnol Oceanog 9:39–44Google Scholar
  15. -(1970) Factors in the transformation of mercury to methylmercury. In: Environmental Mercury Contamination. Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc, pp 167–172Google Scholar
  16. Klein DH (1972) Mercury and some other metals in urban soils. Environ Sci Technol 6:560–569Google Scholar
  17. Lindstedt G, Skare I (1971) Microdetermination of mercury in biological samples II. An apparatus for rapid atomic determination of Hg in digested samples. Analyst 96:223–230Google Scholar
  18. Meites L (1963) Handbook of Analytical Chemistry. McGraw-Hill, NY pp 1–19Google Scholar
  19. Rahola T, Hattula T, Korolainen A, Miettinen JK (1971) Absorption and elimination of dietary mercury (Hg++) in man. Ann Clin Res 3:116–120Google Scholar
  20. Robinson JB, Tuovinen OH (1984) Mechanisms of microbial resistance and detoxification of mercury and organomercury compounds: Physiological, biochemical, and genetic analyses. Microbiol Rev 48:95–124Google Scholar
  21. Teisinger J, Fiserova-Bergerova V (1965) Pulmonary retention and excretion of mercury vapors in man. Ind Med Surg 34:584–589Google Scholar
  22. Trost PB, Bisque RE (1970) Distribution of mercury in residual soils. In: Environmental Mercury Contamination. Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc, pp 178–196Google Scholar
  23. Tsubaki K, Sato T, Kondo T, Shirakawa K, Kambayashi K, Hirota K, Yamada K, Murone I (1967) Outbreak of intoxication by organic mercury compounds in Niigata prefecture: An epidemiological and clinical study. Jap J Med 6:132–148Google Scholar
  24. Uthe JP, Armstrong AJ, Stainton MP (1970) Mercury determination in fish samples of wet digestion and flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Fish Res Board Canada 27:805–809Google Scholar
  25. West RC (1985) Handbook of Chemistry, 66th Edition, The Chemical Rubber Co. pp B114–B116Google Scholar
  26. World Health Organization (WHO) (1976) Environmental Health Criteria 1: Mercury. Geneva, Switzerland, p 132Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. W. Revis
    • 1
  • T. R. Osborne
    • 1
  • G. Holdsworth
    • 1
  • C. Hadden
    • 1
  1. 1.Oak Ridge Research Institute, Inc.Oak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations