Chemometric comparison of polychlorinated biphenyl residues and toxicologically active polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in the eggs of Forster's Terns (Sterna fosteri)

  • Ted R. Schwartz
  • David L. Stalling
Article

Abstract

The separation and characterization of complex mixtures of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is approached from the perspective of a problem in chemometrics. A technique for quantitative determination of PCB congeners is described as well as an enrichment technique designed to isolate only those congener residues which induce mixed aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase enzyme activity. A congener-specific procedure is utilized for the determination of PCBs in whichn-alkyl trichloroacetates are used as retention index marker compounds. Retention indices are reproducible in the range of ±0.05 to ±0.7 depending on the specific congener. A laboratory data base system developed to aid in the editing and quantitation of data generated from capillary gas chromatography was employed to quantitate chromatographic data. Data base management was provided by computer programs written in VAX-DSM (Digital Standard MUMPS) for the VAX-DEC (Digital Equipment Corp.) family of computers.

In the chemometric evaluation of these complex chromatographic profiles, data are viewed from a single analysis as a point in multi-dimensional space. Principal Components Analysis was used to obtain a representation of the data in a lower dimensional space. Two-and three-dimensional proections based on sample scores from the principal components models were used to visualize the behavior of Aroclor® mixtures. These models can be used to determine if new sample profiles may be represented by Aroclor profiles. Concentrations of individual congeners of a given chlorine substitution may be summed to form homologue concentration. However, the use of homologue concentrations in classification studies with environmental samples can lead to erroneous conclusions about sample similarity. Chemometric applications are discussed for evaluation of Aroclor mixture analysis and compositional description of environmental residues of PCBs in eggs of Forster's terns (Sterna fosteri) collected from colonies near Lake Poygan and Green Bay, Wisconsin. The application of chemometrics is extended to the comparison of: a) Aroclors and PCB-containing environmental samples; to b) fractions of Aroclors and of environmental samples that have been enriched in congeners which induce mixed aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase enzyme activity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albano C, Dunn WJ III, Edlund U, Esbensen K, Hellberg S, Johansson E, Lindberg W, Sjöström M (1978) Four levels of pattern recognition. Anal Chim Acta Compu Tech Optim 103:429–443Google Scholar
  2. Albro PW, Corbett JT, Schroeder JL (1981) Quantitative characterization of polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures (Aroclor® 1248, 1254, and 1260) by gas chromatography using capillary columns. J Chromatogr 205:103–111Google Scholar
  3. Ballschmiter K, Zell MZ (1980) Analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) by glass capillary gas chromatography. Composition of technical Aroclor-and Clophen®-PCB Mixtures. Z Anal Chem 320:20–31Google Scholar
  4. Bandiera S, Sawyer T, Romkes M, Zmudzka B, Safe L, Mason G, Keys B, Safe S (1984) Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs): Effects of structure on binding to the 2,3,7,8-TCDD cytosol receptor protein. Toxicology 32:131–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkman UA, Th de Kok A (1980) Production, properties and usage. In: Kimbrough RD (ed) Topics in environmental health: Vol. 4. Halogenated biphenyls, terphenyls, naphthalenes, dibenzodioxins and related products, North-Holland, NY, pp 2–7Google Scholar
  6. Bush B, Connor S, Snow J (1982) Glass capillary gas chromatography for sensitive accurate polychlorinated biphenyl analysis. J Assoc Offic Anal Chem 65:555–566Google Scholar
  7. Derde MP, Coomans D, Massart DL (1982) Effect of scaling on class modeling with the SIMCA method. Anal Chim Acta 141:187–192Google Scholar
  8. Duinker JC, Hillebrand JIJ, Palmark KH, Wilhemsen S (1980) An evaluation of existing methods for quantitation of polychlorinated biphenyls in environmental samples and suggestions for an improved method based on measurement of individual components. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 25:956–964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn WJ III, Stalling DL, Schwartz TR, Hogan JW, Petty JD (1984) Pattern recognition for classification and determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in environmental samples. Anal Chem 56:1308–1313Google Scholar
  10. Environmental, Protection Agency (USEPA) (1979) Appendix III. Example quality assurance and quality control procedures for organic priority pollutants. Federal Register 44:69540–69559 (December 3, 1979)Google Scholar
  11. Erikson MD (1986) Analytical Chemistry of PCBs. Ann Arbor Science, Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, MA, 508 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein JA (1980) Structure-activity relationships for the biochemical effects and the relationship to toxicity: In: Kimbrough RD (ed) Topics in environmental health: Vol. 4. Halogenated biphenyls, terphenyls, naphthalenes, dibenzodioxins and related products, North-Holland, NY, Chapter 6Google Scholar
  13. Jensen S (1966) Report on a new chemical hazard. New Sci 32:612Google Scholar
  14. Johansson E, Sjöström K, Wold S (1984) Minimizing effects of closure on analytical data. Anal Chem 56:1685–1688Google Scholar
  15. Kowalski B (1973) Pattern recognition II. Linear and nonlinear methods for displaying chemical data. J Amer Chem Soc 95:686–693Google Scholar
  16. Kubiak TJ, Harris HJ, Smith LM, Schwartz TR, Stalling DL, Trick JA, Sileo L, Docherty DE, Erdman TC (1989) Microcontaminants and reproductive impairment of the Forster's tern on Green Bay, Lake Michigan-1983. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 18:706–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kvalheim OM (1985) Scaling of analytical data. Anal Chi Acta 177:71–79Google Scholar
  18. Luotamo M, Aitio A, Wold S (1988) Serum polychlorinated biphenyls: Quantitation and Identification of source exposure by the SIMCA pattern recognition method. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 4 (2):171–181Google Scholar
  19. McConnell EE (1980) Acute and chronic toxicity, carcinogenesis, reproduction, teratogenesis and mutagenesis in animals. In: Kimbrough RD (ed) Topics in environmental health: Vol. 4. Halogenated biphenyls, terphenyls, naphthalenes, dibenzodioxins and related products, North-Holland, NY, Chapter 5Google Scholar
  20. Massart DL, Dijskstra A, Kaufman L (1978) Evaluation and Optimization of Laboratory Methods and Analytical Procedures. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 596 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullin MD, Pochini CM, McCrindle S, Romkes M, Safe SH, Safe L (1984) High resolution PCB analysis: Synthesis and chromatographic properties of all 209 PCB congeners. Environ Sci Technol 18:468–476Google Scholar
  22. Onuska FJ, Mudroch A, Davies SJ (1985) Application of chemometrics in homologue-specific analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls. J High Res Chromatog and Chromatog Comm 8:748–754Google Scholar
  23. Polland A, Knutson JC (1982) 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: Examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 22:517–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rappe C, Buser HR (1980) Chemical Properties and Analytical Methods. In: Kimbrough RD (ed) Topics in environmental health: Vol. 4. Halogenated biphenyls, terphenyls, naphthalenes, dibenzodioxins and related products, North-Holland, NY, pp 41–47Google Scholar
  25. Safe S, Parkinson A, Robertson L, Crockerline R, Safe L, Bandiera S, Okey A (1982) PCBs as AHH inducers. In: Hutzinger, O, Frei, RW, Merian, E, Pocchiari, F, (eds) Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds. Pergamon Press: New York, 1982, pp 383–392Google Scholar
  26. Safe S, Bandiera S, Sawyer T, Robertson L, Safe L, Parkinson A, Thomas PE, Ryan DE, Reik LM, Levin W, Denomme MA, Fujita T (1985) In: Environmental Health Perspectives, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Publication no. (NIH) 85-218; May 1985, 60, 47–56Google Scholar
  27. Schiffman SS, Reynolds ML, Young FW (1981) Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith LM (1981) Carbon Dispersed in Glass Fibers as an Adsorbent for Contaminant Enrichment and Fractionation. Anal Chem 53:2152–2154Google Scholar
  29. Smith LM, Schwartz TR, Kubiak TJ (1986) Occurrence of AHH-Active Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Dibenzodioxins and Dibenzofurans in Lake Michigan Sediment and Biota. The Question of Their Relative Toxicological Significance. Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Division of Environmental Chemistry, Paper 24, Anaheim, CAGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz TR, Smith LM (1987) Determination of AHH-Active PCB Isomers in PCB Mixtures and Environmental Samples. Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Division of Environmental Chemistry, Paper 76, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz TR, Lehmann RG (1982) Determination of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Plant Tissue. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28:723–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz TR, Campbell RD, Stalling DL, Little RL, Petty JD, Hogan JW, Kaiser EM (1984) Laboratory data base for isomerspecific determination of polychlorinated biphenyls. Anal Chem 56:1303–1308Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz TR, Petty JD, Kaiser EM (1983) Preparation ofn-Alkyl Trichloroacetates and Their Use as Retention Index Standards in Gas chromatography. Anal Chem 56, 1839Google Scholar
  34. Schwartz TR, Stalling DL, Rice CL (1986) Are polychlorinated biphenyl residues adequately described by Aroclor mixture equivalences? Isomer-specific principal components analysis of such residues in fish and turtles. Environ Sci Technol 21:72–76Google Scholar
  35. Sharaf MA, Illman DL, Kowalski BR (1986) Exploratory Data Analysis. In: Chemometrics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 179–296Google Scholar
  36. Sjöström M, Wold S, Lindberg W, Persson JA, Martens H (1983) A multivariate calibration problem in analytical chemistry solved by partial least-squares models in latent variables. Anal Chim Acta 150:61–70Google Scholar
  37. Stalling DL, Tindle RC, Johnson JL (1972) Cleanup of pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in fish extracts by gel permeation chromatography. J Assoc Offic Anal Chem 55:32–38Google Scholar
  38. Stalling DL, Dunn WJ III, Schwartz TR, Hogan JW, Petty JD, Johansson E, Wold S (1985a) Application of soft independent method of class analogy (SIMCA) in isomer specific analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls. In: Kurtz DA (ed) Trace residue analysis, chemometric estimations of sampling, amount and error. ACS Symposium Series No. 284, American Chemical Society, Washington, CD, pp 195–234Google Scholar
  39. Stalling DL, Schwartz TR, Dunn WJ III, Petty JD (1985b) Soft Independent Methods of Class Analogy: Use in characterizing complex mixtures and environmental residues of polychlorinated biphenyls. In: Breen JJ, Robinson PE (eds) Environmental applications of chemometrics. ACS Symposium Series, No. 292, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  40. Stalling DL, Schwartz TR, Dunn WJ III, Wold S (1987) Classification of polychlorinated biphenyl residues: Isomers vs homologue concentrations in modeling Aroclors and polychlorinated biphenyl residues. Anal Chem 59:1853–1859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Webb RG, McCall AC (1973) Quantitative PCB standards for electron capture gas chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 11:366–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wold S, Sjöström M (1977) SIMCA: A method for analyzing chemical data in terms of similarity and analogy. In: Kowalski BR (ed) Chemometrics, theory and application. ACS Symposium Series No. 52, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 243–282Google Scholar
  43. Wold S, Albano C, Dunn WJ III, Edlund U, Esbensen K, Helberg S, Johansson E, Lindberg W, Sjöström M (1984a) Modeling data tables by principal components and pls: class patterns and quantitative predictive relations. Analusis 12:477–485Google Scholar
  44. Wold S, Albano C, Dunn WJ III, Edlund U, Geladi P, Hellberg S, Johansson E, Lindberg W, Sjöström M (1984b) Multivariate data analysis in chemistry. In: Chemometrics mathematics and statistics in chemistry, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp 17–95Google Scholar
  45. Wold S (1978) Cross validatory estimation of the number of principal components in factor and principal component models. Technometrics 20, 397Google Scholar
  46. — (1982) The analysis of multivariate chemical data using SIMCA and MACUP. Kemia-Kemi 9:401–405Google Scholar
  47. — (1989) Multivariate data analysis: Converting chemical data tables to plots. Intelligent Instruments and Computers 7(5), 197Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted R. Schwartz
    • 2
  • David L. Stalling
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Fisheries Contaminant Research CenterColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Analytical Bio-Chemistry Laboratories, Inc.Columbia

Personalised recommendations