Lead, cadmium, and mercury tissue residues in healthy swine, cattle, dogs, and horses from the midwestern United States

  • L. Penumarthy
  • F. W. Oehme
  • R. H. Hayes
Article

Abstract

A survey was conducted in 1975–1976 to determine the background levels of lead, cadmium, and mercury in tissues of healthy swine, cattle, dogs, and horses from the midwestern United States. Blood, muscle, liver, and kidney were assayed from cattle and swine slaughtered at federal meat inspection plants and in dogs and horses obtained from local pounds and sales barns. A total of 959 samples for lead, 972 samples for cadmium, and 827 samples for mercury were analyzed. The maximum muscle lead concentration was less than 0.10 ppm in dogs and horses. Fourteen percent of the cattle muscle samples contained between 0.16 and 0.34 ppm lead. The blood lead concentration was generally lower than 0.10 ppm in cattle, swine and horses; however, in dogs 44% of the blood lead values were between 0.11 and 0.37 ppm. The liver and kidney lead content was generally less than 0.50 ppm in all species, and the maximum lead content detected in either tissue was less than 2.0 ppm. Elevated tissue levels of cadmium were observed in horses as compared to other species. While the maximum muscle cadmium content in cattle, swine, and dogs rarely exceeded 0.05 ppm, levels in excess of 0.06 ppm were found in all the 19 horse muscle samples. Blood cadmium levels in all species were near or below the detection limit of 0.005 ppm. The median cadmium concentration in liver and kidney was below 0.2 and 0.6 ppm, respectively, in cattle, swine, and dogs. However, in horses the median concentration was 20 times greater in liver and 4 times higher in kidney. The mercury concentrations in muscle and blood of all species were near or below the detection limit of 0.02 ppm. The median concentrations of mercury in liver and kidney, respectively, were: 0.02 ppm each in swine and cattle; 0.02 ppm and 0.05 ppm in dogs; and 0.12 ppm and 0.72 ppm in horses. The results suggest that exposure of animals to dietary or environmental lead, cadmium, and mercury in the midwestern United States is not significant. The specific cumulation of cadmium and mercury in tissues of horses suggests the need to explore the role these metals play in selective biological processes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Analytical methods for atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Norwalk: Perkin-Elmer Corp. (1973).Google Scholar
  2. Buck, W. B., G. D. Osweiler, and G. A. Van Gelder: Clinical and diagnostic veterinary toxicology. 2 ed. Iowa: Kendall-Hunt (1976).Google Scholar
  3. Dassani, S. D., B. E. McClellan, and M. Gordon: Submicrogram level determination of mercury in seeds, grains, and food products by cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Agr. Food Chem.23, 671 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. Friberg, L., M. Giscator, G. F. Norberg, and T. Kjellstrom: Cadmium in the environment. Cleveland: CRC Press (1974).Google Scholar
  5. Goldwater, L. J.: Mercury in the environment. Scient. Amer.224, 15 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. Grahwit, G.: Untersuchungen uber den gehalt an toxischen schwermetallen in Organen normal geschlechteter tiere. Volraufige mittelung: Blei in rinderorganen. Arch. Lebensmittelhyg.23, 213 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. Hall, E. T.: Mercury in commercial canned sea food. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists57, 1068 (1974).Google Scholar
  8. Hemphill, F. E., M. L. Kaeberle, and W. B. Buck: Lead suppression of mouse resistance to salmonella typhimurium. Science172, 1031 (1971).Google Scholar
  9. Hugunin, A. G., and R. L. Bradley, Jr.: Exposure of man to mercury. A review. I. Environmental contamination and biochemical relationships. J. Milk Food Technol.38, 285 (1975a).Google Scholar
  10. —: Exposure of man to mercury. A review. II. Contamination of food and analytical methods. J. Milk Food Technol.38, 354 (1975b).Google Scholar
  11. Kacmar, P., O. Blochova, and A. Samo: Olovo v organoch a tkanivach Jatocneho hovadzieho dobytka ako dosledok znecistovania Prostredia. Veterinarni Medicina22, 635 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. Kagi, J. H. R., and B. L. Vallee: Metallothionein: A cadmium-zinc-containing protein from equine renal cortex. J. Biol. Chem.235, 3460 (1960).Google Scholar
  13. Kothandaraman, P., and J. F. Dallmeyer: Improved desiccator for mercury cold vapor technique. At. Absorption Newslett.15, 120 (1976).Google Scholar
  14. Kubota, J., V. A. Lazar, and F. Losee: Copper, zinc, cadmium, and lead in human blood from 19 locations in the United States. Arch. Environ. Health16, 788 (1968).Google Scholar
  15. Mahaffey, K. R.: Mineral concentrations in animal tissues: Certain aspects of FDA's regulatory role. J. Animal Sci.,44, 509 (1977).Google Scholar
  16. Mahaffey, K. R., P. E. Corneliussen, C. F. Jelinek, and J. A. Fiorino: Heavy metal exposure from foods. Environ. Health Perspect.,12, 63 (1975).Google Scholar
  17. Miettinen, J. K.: The accumulation and excretion of heavy metals in organisms. In P. A. Krenkel (ed.): Heavy metals in the aquatic environment. 1 ed. p. 155. New York: Pergamon Press (1975).Google Scholar
  18. Page, A. L., and F. T. Bingham: Cadmium residues in the environment. Residue Reviews48, 1 (1973).Google Scholar
  19. Prior, M. G.: Lead and mercury residues in kidney and liver of Canadian slaughter animals. Canad. J. Comp. Med.40, 9 (1976).Google Scholar
  20. Pulido, Pl, J. H. R. Kagi, and B. L. Vallee: Isolation and some properties of human metallothionein. Biochemistry5, 1968 (1966).Google Scholar
  21. Saha, J. G.: Significance of mercury in the environment. Residue Reviews42, 103 (1972).Google Scholar
  22. Spaulding, J. E.: Pesticide and heavy metal residues. Proc. Meat Ind. Res. Conf. 11 (1972).Google Scholar
  23. Thomas, C. W., J. L. Rising, and J. K. Moore: Blood lead concentrations in three groups of dogs from a suburban Illinois community. JAVMA167, 995 (1975).Google Scholar
  24. Underwood, E. J.: Trace elements in human and animal nutrition. 3 ed. New York-London: Acad. Press (1971).Google Scholar
  25. Uthe, J. F., F. A. J. Armstrong, and M. P. Stainton: Mercury determination in fish samples by wet digestion and flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada27, 805 (1970).Google Scholar
  26. WHO (World Health Organization): Evaluation of mercury, lead, cadmium, and the food additives amaranth, diethylpyrocarbonate, and octyl gallate. WHO Food Additives Series, No. 4. Geneva: WHO (1972).Google Scholar
  27. Yeager, D. W., J. Cholak, and E. W. Henderson: Determination of lead in biological and related material by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Env. Sci. Technol.5, 1020 (1971).Google Scholar
  28. Zook, B. C., J. L. Carpenter, and E. B. Leeds: Lead poisoning in dogs. JAVMA155, 1329 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Penumarthy
    • 1
  • F. W. Oehme
    • 1
  • R. H. Hayes
    • 1
  1. 1.Comparative Toxicology Laboratory, College of Veterinary MedicineKansas State UniversityManhattan

Personalised recommendations