In vitro cytotoxicity of metals to bluegill (BF-2) cells

  • H. Babich
  • J. A. Puerner
  • E. Borenfreund
Article

Abstract

BF-2 cells, an established fibroblastic cell line derived from the caudal fin of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), were exposed to 18 metal salts. Cytotoxieity was assayed by the neutral red (NR) technique. Based on the concentration of metal that reduced the uptake of neutral red by 50% (NR50), the rank order of Cytotoxieity for the cationic metals was silver > mercury > cadmium > zinc > copper > cobalt > nickel > lead > tin > manganese > chromium (trivalent), and for the anionic metal complexes it was arsenite > dichromate > chromate > arsenate > selenite > permanganate > selenate. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.909) between the NR50 ranking for the divalent metal cations and their chemical softness parameters (σp). A good correlation (r=0.833) was also found between thein vitro NR50 Cytotoxieity values for the cationic metals and thein vivo water-borne LC50 values for bluegill. There was no correlation, however, between NR50 and LC50 data for the anionic metal complexes, primarily due to the unusual tolerance, as reported in the literature, of fish for hexavalent chromium salts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babich H, Schiffenbauer M, Stotzky G (1982) Comparative toxicity of trivalent and hexavalent chromium to fungi. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28:452–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belton JC, Benson NC (1985) Growth inhibitory and cytotoxic effects of three arsenic compounds on cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Environ Sci Hlth A20:37–72Google Scholar
  3. Beyersmann D, Koster A, Buttner B, Flessel P (1984) Model reactions of chromium compounds with mammalian and bacterial cells. Toxicol Environ Chem 8:279–286Google Scholar
  4. Bitton G (1983) Bacterial and biochemical tests for assessing chemical toxicity in the aquatic environment: a review. CRC Crit Rev Environ Contr 13:51–67Google Scholar
  5. Black JJ (1983) Field and laboratory studies of environmental carcinogens in Niagara River fish. J Great Lakes Res 9:326–334Google Scholar
  6. Bols NC, Boliska SA, Dixon DG, Hodson PV, Kaiser KLE (1985) The use of fish cell cultures as an indication of contaminant toxicity to fish. Aquat Toxicol 6:147–155Google Scholar
  7. Borenfreund E, Puerner JA (1985a) Toxicity determinedin vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol Lett 24:119–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Borenfreund E, Puerner JA (1985b) A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assays. J Tiss Cult Meth 9:7–9Google Scholar
  9. Buccafusco RJ, Ells SJ, LeBlanc GA (1981) Acute toxicity of priority pollutants to bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 26:446–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Buikema AL, Niederlehner BR, Cairns J Jr (1982) Biological monitoring. Part IV—Toxicity testing. Water Res 16:239–262Google Scholar
  11. Cardwell RD, Foreman DG, Payne TR, Wilbur DJ (1976) Acute toxicity of selenium dioxide to freshwater fishes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 4:129–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond L, Clark HF (1970) Comparative studies on the interaction of benzo(a)pyrene with cells derived from poikilothermic and homeothermic vertebrates. I. Metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene. J Natl Cancer Inst 45:1005–1011Google Scholar
  13. Ekwall B (1983) Screening of toxic compounds in mammalian cell cultures. Ann NY Acad Sci 407:64–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Environmental Protection Agency (1980a) An exposure and risk assessment for zinc. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. —(1980b) Arsenic. Ambient water quality criteria. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. —(1981) New chemical substances: premanufacture testing policy. Federal Register 46:8986–8992Google Scholar
  17. Finter NB (1969) Dye uptake methods for assessing viral cytopathogenicity and their application to interferon assays. J Gen Virol 5:419–427Google Scholar
  18. Fisher AB (1981) Comparative studies of heavy metal toxicity at the cellular level. In: International conference on heavy metals in the environment, pp 486–489, Commission of the European Communities and the World Health Organization, Edinburgh, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  19. Forsberg CW (1978) Effects of heavy metals and other trace elements on the fermentative activity of the rumen microflora and growth of functionally important rumen bacteria. Can J Microbiol 24:298–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frazier ME, Andrews TK (1979)In vitro clonal growth assay for evaluating toxicity of metal salts. In: Kharasch N (ed) Trace substances in health and disease, pp 71–81, Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Harshbarger JC, Cullen LJ, Calabrese MJ, Spero PM, Bauman PC, Parland WK (1984) Epidermal, hepatocellular, and cholangiocellular carcinomas in brown bullheads,Ictalurus nebulosus, from industrially polluted Black River, Ohio. Mar Environ Res 14:535–536Google Scholar
  22. Hsie AW, Schenley RL, Tan E-L, Perdue SW, Williams MW, Hayden TL, Turner JE (1984) The toxicity of sixteen metallic compounds in Chinese hamster ovary cells: a comparison with mice andDrosophila. In: Goldberg AM (ed) Al- ternative methods in toxicology, Vol. 2, Acute toxicity testing: alternative approaches, pp 115–125, Liebert Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones MM, Vaughn WK (1978) HSAB theory and acute metal ion toxicity and detoxification processes. J Inorg Nucl Chem 40:2081–2088Google Scholar
  24. Kocan RM, Landolt ML, Sabo KM (1979)In vitro toxicity of eight mutagens/carcinogens for three fish cell lines. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 23:269–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kocan RM, Landolt ML, Bond J, Benditt EP (1981)In vitro effect of some mutagens/carcinogens on cultured fish cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 10:663–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar HD, Prakash G (1971) Toxicity of selenium to the bluegreen algae,Anacystis nidulans andAnabaena variabilis. Ann Bot 35:697–705Google Scholar
  27. Langard S (1980) Chromium. In: Waldron HA (ed) Metals in the environment, pp 111–133, Academic Press, London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  28. Leonard, A, Lauwerys RR (1980) Carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chromium. Mutat Res 76:227–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Levis AG, Majone F (1979) Cytotoxic and clastogenic effects of soluble chromium compounds on mammalian cell cultures. Br J Cancer 40:523–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Meisch H-L, Schmitt-Beckmann I (1979) Influence of tri- and hexavalent chromium on twoChlorella strains. Z Pflanzen physiol 94:231–239Google Scholar
  31. Nemes Z, Dietz R, Luth JB, Gomba S, Hackenthal E, Gross F (1979 The pharmacological relevance of vital staining with neutral red. Experientia 35:1475–1476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nieboer E, Richardson DHS (1980) The replacement of the nondescript term “heavy metals” by a biologically and chemically significant classification of metal ions. Environ Pollut Series B 1:3–26Google Scholar
  33. Ohno H, Hanaoka F, Yamada M (1982) Inducibility of sisterchromatid exchanges by heavy metal ions. Mutat Res 104:141–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson A, Lewne M, Walum E (1981) Acute toxicity of organic solvents, heavy metals, and DDT tested in cultures of mouse neuroblastoma cells. Toxicol Lett 9:101–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pickering QH, Henderson C (1966) The acute toxicity of some heavy metals to different species of warm water fishes. Air Water Pollut Intern J 10:453–463Google Scholar
  36. Reinhardt CA, Pelli DA, Sandvold M (1985) Cell detachment and growth of fibroblasts as parameters for cytotoxicity of inorganic metal saltsin vitro. Cell Biol Toxicol 1:33–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shopsis C, Borenfreund E, Walberg J, Stark DM (1984)In vitro cytotoxicity assays as potential alternatives to the Draize ocular irritancy test. In: Goldberg AM (ed) Alternative methods in toxicology, Vol. 2, Acute toxicity testing: alternative approaches, pp 103–114, Liebert Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Trama FB, Benoit RJ (1960) Toxicity of hexavalent chromium to bluegills. J Water Pollut Contr Fed 32:868–877Google Scholar
  39. Umeda M, Nishimura M (1979) Inducibility of chromosomal aberrations by metal compounds in cultured mammalian cells. Mutat Res 67:221–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Putte I, Brinkhorst MA, Koeman JH (1981) Effect of pH on the acute toxicity of hexavalent chromium to rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Aquat Toxicol 1:129–142Google Scholar
  41. Venier P, Montaldi A, Majone F, Bianchi V, Levis AG (1982) Cytotoxic, mutagenic, and clastogenic effects of industrial chromium compounds. Carcinogenesis 3:1331–1338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Walum E, Peterson A (1984) On the application of cultured neuroblastoma cells in chemical toxicity screening. J Toxicol Environ Hlth 13:511–520Google Scholar
  43. Williams MW, Hoeschele JD, Turner JE, Jacobson KB, Christie NT, Paton CL, Smith LH, Witschi HR, Lee EH (1982) Chemical softness and acute metal toxicity in mice andDrosophila. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 63:461–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams RJP, Turner JE (1981) Comments on softness parameters and metal ion toxicity. J Inorg Nucl Chem 43:1689–1691Google Scholar
  45. Winckler J (1974) Vitalfarbung von Lysosomen und anderen Zellorganellen der Ratte mit neutralrot. Progr Histochem Cytochem 6:1–89Google Scholar
  46. Wolf K, Mann JA (1980) Poikilotherm vertebrate cell lines and viruses: a current listing for fishes. In Vitro 16:168–179PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Babich
    • 1
  • J. A. Puerner
    • 1
  • E. Borenfreund
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory Animal Research CenterThe Rockefeller UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations