Advertisement

Effects of lindane, paraquat, toxaphene, and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid on mallard embryo development

  • David J. Hoffman
  • William C. EastinJr.
Article

Abstract

The effects were determined of externally treating mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) eggs with two insecticides (lindane and toxaphene) and two herbicides (paraquat and 2,4,5-T) with formulations and concentrations similar to field applications. Paraquat was the most embryotoxic of the four compounds regardless of the type of vehicle. The LC50 for paraquat was 1.5 lb of active ingredient/ acre in aqueous emulsion and 0.1 lb/acre in the oil vehicle. The other compounds had LC50's that were several orders of magnitude higher. Both paraquat and toxaphene caused some mortality at 1/2 of the field level of application. Paraquat impaired growth and was slightly teratogenic at 1/2 of the field level of application, but required higher concentrations (1.5 to 3 times the field level) to produce brain and visceral defects. Lindane was teratogenic, resulting in multiple defects but only at doses that were greater than five times the field level of application. Toxaphene resulted in defects of the joints at doses close to or exceeding the LC50. The herbicide 2,4,5-T resulted in few toxic effects and relatively few abnormal survivors with gross defects. The overall embryotoxicity with either vehicle was paraquat > lindane > toxaphene > 2,4,5-T on a lb per acre basis. However the potential hazard at exposures of up to five times the field level of application was paraquat > toxaphene; neither lindane nor 2,4,5-T constituted much of a hazard. Both paraquat and lindane were more toxic on a lb-peracre basis when administered in oil vehicle but only paraquat represented a potential hazard at five times the field level of application.

Keywords

Waste Water Water Pollution Toxic Effect Active Ingredient Field Application 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albers, P. H.: Effects of external applications of fuel oils on hatchability of mallard eggs. In D. A. Wolfe, (ed.):Fate and effects of petroleum hydrocarbons in marine ecosystems and organisms, pp. 158–163. New York: Pergamon Press (1977).Google Scholar
  2. Allred, P. M., and J. R. Strange: The effects of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on developing chicken embryos. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.6, 483 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, P. J., and A. E. Snart,: A photographic index for aging mallard embryos. J. Wildl. Manage.38, 298 (1974).Google Scholar
  4. Coon, N. C., P. H. Albers, and R. C. Szaro: No. 2 fuel oil de-creases embryonic survival of great black-backed gulls. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.21, 151 (1979).Google Scholar
  5. Courtney, K. D., D. W. Gaylor, M. D. Hogan, H. L. Falk, R. R. Bates, and I. Mitchell: Teratogenic evaluation of 2,4,5-T. Science168, 864 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtney, K. D., and J. A. Moore: Teratology studies with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.20, 396 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. David, D.: Gas Chromatographic study of the rate of penetration of DDT into quail eggs at different stages of their development. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.21, 289 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deakin, A., and G. Robertson: Effects of mercurial ointment on hatchability. Poultry Sci.8, (301) 1933.Google Scholar
  9. Dewitt, J. B., and J. L. George: Pesticide-Wildlife Rev., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., USDI, Washington DC (1957).Google Scholar
  10. Dunachie, J. F., and W. W. Fletcher: An investigation of the toxicity of insecticides to bird eggs using the egg-injection technique. Ann. Appl. Biol.64, 409 (1969).Google Scholar
  11. —: The toxicity of certain herbicides to hens’ eggs assessed by the egg-injection technique. Ann. Appl. Biol.66, 515 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. E.P.A. Compendium of registered pesticides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1977).Google Scholar
  13. Fere, C: Notes. C.R. Soc. Biol. (1893–1901).Google Scholar
  14. Finney, D. J.: Probit analysis, 2 ed., Cambridge University Press (1952).Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, K.: Production and viability of eggs from hens treated with paraquat. Nature215, 1407 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, B. M., and M. A. Vince: Development of the Avian Embryo: A behavioral and physiological study, p. 191. New York: John Wiley and Sons (1974).Google Scholar
  17. Hamburger, V., and H. L. Hamilton: A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol.88, 49 (1951).Google Scholar
  18. Hanson, H. C.: Criteria of age of incubated mallard, wood duck, and bob-white quail eggs. Auk.71, 267 (1954).Google Scholar
  19. Haseltine, S. D., M. T. Finley, and E. Chromartie: Reproduction and residue accumulation in black ducks fed toxaphene. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.9, 461 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffman, D. J.: Embryotoxic effects of crude oil in mallard ducks and chicks. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.46, 183 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman, D. J.: Embryotoxic and teratogenic effects of petroleum hydrocarbons in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health5, 835 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffman, D. J., and J. F. Moore: Teratogenic effects of external egg applications of methyl mercury in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), Teratology20, 453 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Karnofsky, D. A.: The chick embryo in drug screening; survey of teratological effects observed in the 4-day old chick embryo. In J. G. Wilson and J. K. Warkary (ed): Teratology: Principles and techniques p. 194 Univ. Chicago Press (1965).Google Scholar
  24. Lutz-Ostertag, Y., and R. Didier: 2,4,5-T and embryonal sterility. C.R. Soc. Biol.165, 2364 (1971).Google Scholar
  25. Marliac, J. P.: Toxicity and teratogenic effects of 12 pesticides in the chick embryo. Federation Proc.23, 105 (1964).Google Scholar
  26. Mehrle, P. M., M. T. Finley, J. L. Ludke, F. L. Mayer, and T. E. Kaiser: Bone development in black ducks as affected by dietary toxaphene. Pest. Biochem. Physiol.10, 168 (1979).Google Scholar
  27. Meiniel, R.: L'action teratogene du parathion chez l'embryon d'oiseau. Arch. Anat. His. Embr. Norm. et. Exp.56, 97 (1973).Google Scholar
  28. Mitchell, R. T.: Effects of DDT spray on eggs and nestlings of birds. J. Wildl. Manage.10, 192 (1946).Google Scholar
  29. Public Health Service Publication No. 772, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1962).Google Scholar
  30. Smith, S. I., C. W. Weber, and B. L. Reid: The effect of injection of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides on hatchability of eggs. Toxicol Appl. Pharmacol.16, 179 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sommers, J. D., E. T. Moran, and B. S. Reinhart: Influence of hen dietary calcium and phosphorous on the integrity of the egg shell as it would influence hatching success and the consequences of preincubation 2,4,5-T spraying with and without a high TCDD level. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.19, 648 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Szaro, R. C., and P. H. Albers: Effects of external applications of No. 2 fuel oil on common eider eggs. In D. A. Wolfe (ed.): Fate and effects of petroleum hydrocarbons in marine ecosystems and organisms, p. 164. New York: Pergamon Press (1977).Google Scholar
  33. White, D. H., K. A. King, and N. C. Coon: Effects of No. 2 fuel oil on hatchability of marine and estuarine bird eggs. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.21, 7 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Whitehead, C. C., A. G. Downing, and R. J. Pettigrew: The effects of lindane on laying hens. Br. Poultry Sci.13, 293 (1972).Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, J. G.: Embryological considerations in teratology. In J. F. Wilson and J. K. Warkany, (eds.): Teratology: Principles and techniques, p. 251. Univ. of Chicago Press (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Hoffman
    • 1
  • William C. EastinJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServicePatuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurel

Personalised recommendations