Journal of Fusion Energy

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 131–143 | Cite as

Experimental results from a beam direct converter at 100 kV

  • W. L. Barr
  • R. W. Moir
  • G. W. Hamilton
Contributed Papers


A direct-energy converter was developed for use on neutral-beam injectors. The purpose of the converter is to raise the efficiency of the injector by recovering the portion of the ion beam not converted to neutrals. In addition to increasing the power efficiency, direct conversion reduces the requirements on power supplies and eases the beam dump problem. The converter was tested at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory on a reduced-area version of a neutral-beam injector developed for use on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at Princeton. The conversion efficiency of the total ion power was 65 ±7% at the beginning of the pulse, decaying to just over 50% by the end of the 0.6-s pulse. Once the electrode surfaces were conditioned, the decay was due to the rise in pressure of only the beam gas and not to outgassing. The direct converter was tested with 1.7 A of hydrogen ions and with 1.5 A of helium ions through the aperture with similar efficiencies. At the midplane through the beam, the line power density was 0.7 MW/m, for comparison with our calculations of slab beams and the prediction of 2–4 MW/m in some reactor studies. Over 98 kV was developed at the ion collector when the beam energy was 100 keV. When electrons were suppressed magnetically, rather than electrostatically, the efficiency dropped to 40%. However, a better designed electron catcher could improve this efficiency. New electrode material released gas (mostly H2 and CO) in amounts that exceeded the input of primary gas from the beam. The electrodes were all made of 0.51-mm-thick molybdenum cooled only by radiation. This allowed the heating by the beam to outgas the electrodes and for them to stay hot enough to avoid the reabsorption of gas between shots. By minor redesign of the electrodes, adding cryopanels near the electrodes, and grounding the ion source, these results extrapolate with high confidence to an efficiency of 70–80% at a power density of 2–4 MW/m. Higher power may be possible with magnetic electron suppression.

Key words

fusion direct energy conversion neutral beams 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. L. Barr, R. W. Moir, and G. W. Hamilton, Test results on a high-power, 100-keV beam direct converter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-84432 (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. L. Barr, R. W. Moir, G. W. Hamilton, and A. F. Lietzke, Tests of high-power direct conversion on beams and on plasma, inProc. Eighth Symp. Engineering Problems of Fusion Res., San Francisco, Calif. (IEEE, 1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. L. Barr and R. W. Moir, Test results on plasma direct converters,Nucl. Technol./Fusion, to be published.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. S. Blum, W. L. Barr, W. L. Dexter, J. H. Fink, R. W. Moir, and T. P. Wilcox, Design study of a 120-keV,3He neutral-beam injector,J. Fusion Energy 1:69 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. L. Barr, J. N. Doggett, G. W. Hamilton, J. D. Kinney, and R. W. Moir, Engineering of beam direct conversion for a 120-kV, 1-MW ion beam, inProc. Seventh Symp. Engineering Problems of Fusion Res., Knoxville, Tenn. (IEEE, 1977).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. A. Raimbault, Analytical and numerical analysis of energy recovery systems for neutral-beam injectors, EUR-CEA-FC-899, Report (1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. K. Dagenhart et al., Direct energy conversion of un-neutralized ion beams with close-coupled electric and magnetic fields, inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Plasma Sci., Madison, Wisc. (IEEE, 1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. S. Cooper, High-energy neutral injector with direct energy recovery, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report UCID-7310 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Thompson, J. R. Coupland, D. Dirmikis, D. P. Hammond, and A. J. T. Holmes, The development of neutral injection to the megawatt power level, inProc. Sixth Symp. Engineering Problems of Fusion Res., San Diego, Calif. (IEEE, 1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Hashimoto, K. Sinya, O. Morimiya, J. Ohmori, H, Ohguma, E. Ishii, and H. Yamato, The design study of neutral-beam injection system for JXFR, inProc. Eighth Symp. Engineering Problems of Fusion Res., San Francisco, Calif. (IEEE, 1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. H. Verbeek, inRadiation Effects on Solid Surfaces edited by M. Kaminsky, ed. (American Physical Society, Washington, D.C., 1976), chap. 10. O. C. Oen and M. T. Robinson,Nucl. Instrum. Methods 132:647–653 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Hamasaki, R. C. Davidson, N. A. Krall, and P. C. Liewer,Nucl. Fusion 15:27–33 (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. H. Batzer, R. E. Patrick, and W. R. Call, A neutral-beam-line pump with helium cryotrapping capability, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-81196 (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. L. Barr
    • 1
  • R. W. Moir
    • 1
  • G. W. Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore LaboratoryLivermore

Personalised recommendations