Changes in the nutrient status of soil caused by cropping and fertilization in a Typic Ustochrept
- 41 Downloads
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during 1984–1986 on an alluvial (Typic Ustochrept) soil (pH 8.0, organic carbon 0.46%) at IARI farm, New Delhi to study the changes in available soil nutrients (N, P, K, Mn, Fe, Zn and Cu) at different production levels. Fertilizer was applied to wheat followed by maize, based on the ‘Targetted yield concept’, and mustard was grown after the sequence to estimate the residual effect of nutrients. Nutrient applications for the largest yield targets (6 t ha−1 of wheat followed by 4 or 5 t ha−1 of maize) resulted in a comparatively greater buildup of soil nutrients (N, P and K), the greatest yield of a succeeding mustard crop, and a better soil nutrient status than that at the start of the experiment, even after the mustard. When both crops were fertilized for the largest target yield with straight fertilizers (Urea, SSP and KCl), the additions of N, P and K and of micronutrient cations (Mn, Fe, Zn and Cu) maintained a favorable balance for major and trace nutrients and provided a sound basis for profitable crop production.
Key words
Targetted yield concept Typic Ustochrept buildup depletion balanced fertilization soil fertility maintenancePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Alleksic Z, Broadbent H and Middlehoe V (1968) The effect of Nitrogen fertilization on the release of soil nitrogen. Plant and Soil 29: 474–478Google Scholar
- 2.Anonymous (1981–84) Annual report of All India Coordinated Project for investigation on Soil Test Crop Response Correlation, IARI Center, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- 3.AOAC (1975) Official methods of analysis Assoc Offic Anal Chem, 10th edn. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bhardwaj V and Omanwar PK (1986) Effect of continuous cropping and fertilization on potassium fractions of soil. Trans of the XIII Congress of the Intern Soc of Soil Sci, 13–20 Aug, Vol III: 684–85Google Scholar
- 5.Chapman HD and Pratt PF (1961) Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California, Div of Agric SciGoogle Scholar
- 6.Findlay WI (1973) Influence of fertilizer use on the phosphorus and potassium status of sandy soil. Can J Soil Sci 53: 103–10Google Scholar
- 7.Gattani PD, Jain SV and Seth SP (1976) Effect of continuous use of chemical fertilizer and manure on soil physical and chemical properties. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 24(3): 284–89Google Scholar
- 8.Lutz JA (1973) Potassium supplying power of Groseclose silt loam for Corn. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 4: 23–30Google Scholar
- 9.Olson RA, Anderson FN, Frank KD, Grabouski PH, Rehm GW and Shapiro CA (1987) Soil Testing Interpretations: Sufficiency vs Buildup and Maintenance. SSSA Special publication, 21(5): 41–52Google Scholar
- 10.Ramamoorthy B, Narasimham RL and Dinesh RS (1967) Fertilizer application for specific yield targets of wheat, Sonora-64. Indian Fmg 17: 43–45Google Scholar
- 11.Ramamoorthy B, Randhawa NS and Zende GK (1971) Review of Soil Research in India. ed. Kanwar JS and Roy Chaudhary SP. Int. Symp Soil Fertility Evaluation. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. IARI, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- 12.Sensei N and Polemio M (1981) Trace element addition to soil by application of NPK fertilizers. Fertilizer Research 2: 289–302Google Scholar
- 13.Sharma BM, Singh KD and Ghosh AB (1982) Methodology for prediction of post harvest soil test value of P and K after wheat-maize grown under field condition. Fert news 27 (6): 23–25Google Scholar
- 14.Singh KD and Sharma BM (1978) Fertilizer recommendations based on soil test for targetted yields of different crops. Fert News 23(10): 38–42Google Scholar
- 15.Sonar KR Patil ND and Daftardar SY (1986) Fertilizer requirements for targetting of sorghum yield in Vertisol. Trans of the XIII Congress of the Intern Soc of Soil Sci 13–20 Aug, Vol III: 977–78Google Scholar