Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 129–155 | Cite as

The spatial precision of the honey bees' dance communication

  • William F. Towne
  • James L. Gould


Many social insect species that employ directional recruitment to food finds communicate the location of their targets with seemingly needless imprecision. Here we present evidence that the spatial precision of the honey bees' dance communication has been “tuned” by selection so that recruits are neither so accurate that they usually find areas which have already been depleted nor so inaccurate that they usually fail to find the advertised resources altogether. First, the bees' distance errors are similar in magnitude to their directional errors, and their angular errors decrease greatly with increasing distance to the target (decreasing more than fourfold between 100 and 700 m). As a result, the absolute scatter of recruits remains relatively constant with changing distance to the target (increasing by less than 50% between 100 and 700 m). This is to be expected if the optimal level of imprecision is the same for distance and direction and does not change with the distance of the target from the nest. Second, comparative studies involving three tropical- and one temperate-zone species (all Apis)suggest that the precision of the bees' languages may have been tuned in accordance with the spatial characteristics of the resources each species uses. We suggest that both the round dance, which conveys no directional information for nearby targets, and the high angular divergence in waggle dances indicating targets within several hundred meters of the colony are both understandable in this context.

Key words

Apis communication dance language foraging behavior honey bee information quality insect communication recruitment communication social insects waggle dance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Deneubourg, J. L., Pasteels, J. M., and Verhaeghe, J. C. (1983). Probabilistic behavior in ants: A strategy of errors?.Theor. Biol. 105: 259–271.Google Scholar
  2. Edrich, W. (1975). The waggle dance of the honey bee; a new formulation.Fortschr. Zool. 23(1): 20–30.Google Scholar
  3. Free, J. B., and Williams, I. H. (1983). Scent-marking of flowers by honeybees.J. Apicult. Res. 22(2): 86–90.Google Scholar
  4. Gary, N. E., and Witherell, P. C. (1971). A method for training honey bees to forage at feeding stations.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 448–449.Google Scholar
  5. Gould, J. L. (1975a). Honey bee recruitment: The dance-language controversy.Science 189: 685–693.Google Scholar
  6. Gould, J. L. (1975b). Communication of distance information by honey bees.J. Comp. Physiol. 104: 161–173.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, J. L. (1975c).Honey Bee Communication: The Dance-Language Controversy, Ph.D. thesis, The Rockefeller University, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gould, J. L. (1976). The dance-language controversy.Q. Rev. Biol. 51: 211–244.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, J. L. (1980). The case for magnetic sensitivity in birds and bees (such as it is).Am. Sci. 68: 256–267.Google Scholar
  10. Haldane, J. B. S., and Spurway, H. (1954). A statistical analysis of communication inApis mellifera and a comparison with communication in other animals.Insectes Sociaux 1: 247–283.Google Scholar
  11. Heinrich, B. (1979).Bumblebee Economics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London.Google Scholar
  12. Hubbell, S. P., and Johnson, L. K. (1978). Comparative foraging behavior of six stingless bee species exploiting a standardized resource.Ecology 59: 1123–1136.Google Scholar
  13. Lindauer, M. (1956). Öber die Verständigung bei indischen Bienen.Z. vergl. Physiol. 38: 521–557.Google Scholar
  14. Lindauer, M. (1957). Communication among the honeybees and stingless bees of India.Bee World 38(1): 3–14, 34–39.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, H. and Lindauer, M. (1977). Der Einfluss der Erdmagnetfelds und die Schwereorientierung der Honigbiene.J. Comp. Physiol. 122: 145–187.Google Scholar
  16. Regal, P. J. (1982). Pollination by wind and animals: Ecology of geographic patterns.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 497–524.Google Scholar
  17. Seeley, T. D. (1985a). The information-center strategy of honeybee foraging.Fortschr. Zool. 31: 75–90.Google Scholar
  18. Seeley, T. D. (1985b).Honeybee Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  19. Seeley, T. D. (1986). Social foraging by honeybees: How colonies allocate foragers among patches of flowers.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 343–354.Google Scholar
  20. Towne, W. F. (1985).The Spatial Precision and Mechanisms of the Dance Communication of Honey Bees, Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  21. Towne, W. F., and Gould, J. L. (1985). Magnetic field sensitivity in honey bees. In Kirschvink, J. L., Jones, D. S., and McFadden, B. J. (eds.),Magnetite Biomineralization and Magnetoreception in Organisms, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 385–406.Google Scholar
  22. Visscher, P. K., and Seeley, T. D. (1982). Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest.Ecology 63: 1790–1801.Google Scholar
  23. von Frisch, K. (1948). Gelöste und ungelöste Rätsel Bienensprache.Naturwissenschaften 35: 12–23, 38–43.Google Scholar
  24. von Frisch, K. (1967).The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  25. von Frisch, K., and Lindauer, M. (1961). Öber die “Missweisung” bei den richtungsweisenden Tänzen der Bienen.Naturwissenschaften 48: 585–594.Google Scholar
  26. Waddington, K. D. (1981). Patterns of size variation in bees and evolution of communication systems.Evolution 35: 813–814.Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, D. R. (1969). Wind pollination in the angiosperms: Evolutionary and environmental considerations.Evolution 23: 28–35.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, E. O. (1962). Chemical communication among workers of the fire antSolenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith). 1. The organization of mass-foraging. 2. An information analysis of the odour trail. 3. The experimental induction of social responses.Anim. Behav. 10: 134–164.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, E. O. (1971).The Insect Societies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • William F. Towne
    • 1
  • James L. Gould
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations