Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 125–140 | Cite as

The variability of mating signals and preferences in the brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae)

  • R. K. Butlin


Male and female brown planthoppers, Nilaparvata lugens(Stål) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), exchange substrate-transmitted signals prior to mating. The pulse repetition frequency of the male song is known to be involved in mate recognition and also to vary among geographical populations. Here the variability of male signals, female signals, and female preferences has been examined within a population. Female preference variation has been partitioned into variation in mean preference and variation in the window of preference of individuals. The genetic component of variation has been examined using isofemale lines. Male signal variation was limited (CV=8%) and was mainly within individuals. Female signal variation was greater (CV=15%). Female mean preference varied little (CV=10%) and was closely matched to the male signal mean, but the preference window was wide (> 4 male signal standard deviations on average) and variable (CV=56%). There was evidence for genetic variation only for preference window. These results are discussed in relation to theories of signal system evolution.

Key words

mating signals mate preference genetic variation speciation sexual selection substrate-transmitted vibrations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bradbury, J. W., and Andersson, M. B. (eds.) (1987).Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Butlin, R. K., and Hewitt, G. M. (1986). Heritability estimates for characters under sexual selection in the grasshopperChorthippus brunneus.Anim. Behav. 34: 1256–1261.Google Scholar
  3. Claridge, M. F. (1985). Acoustic signals in the Homoptera: Behaviour, taxonomy and evolution.Anna. Rev. Entomol. 30: 297–317.Google Scholar
  4. Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1984). Specificity of acoustic signals and mate choice in the brown planthopperNilaparvata lugens.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35: 221–226.Google Scholar
  5. Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1985a). Variation in courtship signals and hybridization between geographically definable populations of the rice brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Stål).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 24: 35–49.Google Scholar
  6. Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1985b). The status of weed-associated populations of the brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)—host race or biological species?Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 77–90.Google Scholar
  7. Claridge, M. F., Den Hollander, J., and Morgan, J. C. (1988). Variation in hostplant relations and courtship signals of weed-associated populations of the brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens (Stål), from Australia and Asia: A test of the recognition species concept.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 79–93.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, R. D., and Cardé, R. T. (1989). Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth,Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae).J. Insect Behav. 2: 609–621.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, R. D., and Cardé, R. T. (1990). Selection for increased pheromone response in the male pink bollworm,Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae).Behav. Genet. 20: 325–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coyne, J. A., and Orr, H. A. (1989). Patterns of speciation inDrosophila.Evolution 43: 362–381.Google Scholar
  11. De Jong, M. C. M., and Sabelis, M. W. (1991). Limits to runaway sexual selection: The wallflower paradox.J. Evol. Biol. 4: 637–655.Google Scholar
  12. De Winter, A. J., and Rollenhagen, T. (1990). The importance of male and female behaviour for reproductive isolation inRibautodelphax planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 40: 191–206.Google Scholar
  13. Gerhardt, H. C. (1987). Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea.Anim. Behav. 35: 1479–1489.Google Scholar
  14. Helversen, D. von, and Helverson, O. von (1983). Species recognition and acoustic localization in acridid grasshoppers: A behavioural approach. In Huber, F., and Markl, H. (eds.),Neuroethology and Behavioural Physiology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 95–107.Google Scholar
  15. Ichikawa, T. (1979). Studies on the mating behaviour of four species of auchenorrhynchous Homoptera which attack the rice plant.Mem. Fac. Agr. Kagawa Univ. 34: 1–60.Google Scholar
  16. Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1989). The dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation. In Giddings, L. V., Kaneshiro, K. Y., and Anderson, W. W. (eds.),Genetics, Speciation and the Founder Principle, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 279–296.Google Scholar
  17. Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1990). Natural hybridization inDrosophila, with special reference to species from Hawaii.Can. J. Zool. 68: 1800–1805.Google Scholar
  18. Kaneshiro, K. Y., and Boake, C. R. B. (1987). Sexual selection and speciation: Issues raised by HawaiianDrosophila.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 207–212.Google Scholar
  19. Kyriacou, C. P., and Hall, J. C. (1984). Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behaviour inDrosophila.Nature 308: 62–65.Google Scholar
  20. Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721–3725Google Scholar
  21. Löfstedt, C. (1990). Population variation and genetic control of pheromone communication systems in moths.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54: 199–218.Google Scholar
  22. Parsons, P. A. (1980). Isofemale strains and evolutionary strategies in natural populations.Evol. Biol. 13: 175–217.Google Scholar
  23. Paterson, H. E. H. (1985). The recognition concept of species. In Vrba, E. S. (ed.),Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
  24. Reynolds, J. D., and Gross, M. R. (1990). Costs and benefits of female mate choice: Is there a lek paradox?Am. Nat. 136: 230–243.Google Scholar
  25. Schüch, W., and Barth, F. G. (1990). Vibratory communication in a spider: Female responses to synthetic male vibrations.J. Comp. Physiol. A 166: 817–826.Google Scholar
  26. von Schilcher, F. (1976). The functions of pulse song and sine song in courtship ofDrosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 24: 622–625.Google Scholar
  27. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation.Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Butlin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Pure and Applied BiologyUniversity of Wales College of CardiffCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations