Fertilizer research

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 219–234 | Cite as

Application strategies for Sechura phosphate rock use on permanent pasture

  • P. E. H. Gregg
  • A. D. Mackay
  • L. D. Currie
  • J. K. Syers
Article

Abstract

At two phosphate (P) responsive sites in hill country the effectiveness of Sechura phosphate rock (SPR) as a direct application P fertilizer for permanent pasture was evaluated. Sechura was applied at two rates, in three different application strategies. The treatments were 16.7 and 50 kgP ha−1 annually, 25 and 75 kgP ha−1 biennially, and 50 and 150 kgP ha−1 triennially giving a total of 50 and 150 kgP ha−1, respectively, over three years. Single superphosphate (SSP) served as the standard P fertilizer. A comparison was also made between SPR and Chatham Rise phosphorite (CRP), another reactive PR. Total pasture and legume production and P uptake by pasture was measured with all fertilizer treatments over a three year period.

In the year of application, SPR was as effective as SSP in stimulating total pasture and legume production and P uptake by pasture. This reflects the very reactive nature of this PR. In the second and third years of measurement, SPR did not show superior residual efffects to SSP. The ability of CRP to stimulate legume growth more than SPR in the second year following application demonstrates the danger of generalizing about the residual effects of reactive PR materials. Of the application strategies evaluated, a biennial appplication of 25 kgP ha−1 as SPR maintained legume growth at a higher level than a smaller (16.7 kgP ha−1) annual dressing. The biennial strategy also increased total pasture yield, in addition to legume production to a greater extent in the second and third years than a single (50 kgP ha−1) triennial application.

Key words

Phosphate response legume growth pasture production single superphosphate reactive phosphate rock 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cheney TM, McClellan GH and Montgomery ES (1979) Sechura phosphate deposits, their stratigraphy, origin and compositoin. Econ Geol 74: 232–259Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chien SH and Hammond LL (1978) A comparison of various laboratory methods for predicting the agronomic potential of phosphate rocks for direct application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42: 935–939Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    During C (1972) ‘Fertilizers and Soils in New Zealand Farming’, Government Printer, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glasby GP and Summerhays CP (1975) Sequential deposition of authigenic marine minerals around New Zealand: palaeoenvironmental significance. NZ J Geol & Geophy 18: 477–490Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffman E and Mager E (1953) Solubility of phosphoric acid and phosphate rocks. Pflanzen, Dungung und Bodenkunde 62: 262–264Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khasawneh FE and Doll EC (1978) The use of phosphate rock for direct application to soils. Adv Agron 30: 159–206Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mackay AD, Gregg PEH and Syers JK (1984) Field evaluation of Chatham Rise phosphorite as a phosphatic fertilizer for pasture. NZ J Agric Res 27: 65–82Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackay AD, Syers JK and Gregg PEH (1984) A glasshouse comparison of 6 phosphate fertilizers. NZ J Expt Agric 12: 131–140Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackay AD, Syers JK and Gregg PEH (1984) Ability of chemical extraction procedures to assess the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock materials. NZ J Agric Res 27: 219–230Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackay AD, Syers JK, Tillman RW and Gregg PEH (1986) A simple model to describe the dissolution of phosphate rock in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 291–296Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O'Connor PW and Syers JK (1975) Comparison of methods for the determination of total phosphorus in waters containing particulate material. J Environ Qual 4: 347–350Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS and Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Cir 939 US Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quin BF (1981) Performance of reactive phosphate rocks on irrigated and non-irrigated pasture. Proc. Tech. Workshop on Potential of Phosphate Rock as a Direct Application Fertilizer in New Zealand. p. 12–30 Occasional Report No. 3, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quin BF, Dyson CB and Chiao YS (1987) Agronomic and economic aspects of the use of phosphate rocks for pasture. Development of a predictive model. Proc. Workshop on The Use of Reactive Phosphate Rocks and their Derivatives as Fertilizers. p. 147–163 Occasional Report No. 1, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajan SSS, Gillingham MB, O'Connor MB, Percival NA and Gray MG (1987) Ground phosphate rocks as fertilizers for pasture. Proc. Workshop on The Use of Reactive Phosphate Rocks and their Derivatives as Fertilizers. p. 78–83 Occasional Report No. 1, Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saunders WMH (1965) Phosphate retention of New Zealand soils and its relationship to free sesquioxides, organic matter and other soil properties. NZ J Agric Res 8: 30–57Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA-SCS Agri Handbook 436 US Government Printing Office, Washington DC 754pGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Syers JK and Mackay AD (1986) Reactions of Sechura phosphate rock and single superphosphate in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 480–485Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Syers JK, Mackay AD, Brown MW and Currie LD (1986) Chemical and physical characteristics of phosphate rock materials of varying reactivity. J Sci Food Agric 37: 1057–1064Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Fertilisers Regulations (1969) Document 1969–88. Wellington, Government PrinterGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Twine JR and Williams CH (1971) The determination of phosphorus in Kjeldahl digests of plant material by automatic analysis. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 2: 485–489Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. H. Gregg
    • 1
  • A. D. Mackay
    • 2
  • L. D. Currie
    • 1
  • J. K. Syers
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Soil ScienceMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Scientific and Industrial ResearchGrasslands DivisionPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Environmental ScienceThe UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneU.K.

Personalised recommendations