Fertilizer research

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 21–36 | Cite as

The movement into soil of P from superphosphate grains and its availability to plants

  • D. K. Benbi
  • R. J. Gilkes
Article

Abstract

The movement of P applied as grains of triple superphosphate into two soils (laterite and podzol) of differing P sorption capacities was studied in a laboratory experiment. The availability of this P for plant growth was evaluated by measuring the P desorption characteristics of the fertilized soil and also through a plant growth experiment. Four weeks after fertilizer application to the soil 45% and 72% of the fertilizer P had dissolved for the laterite and podzol, respectively. For both soils all the added P was retained within 80 mm of the fertilizer grain and was considered to occur in the soil in three discrete zones. These zones consist of: (1) the residual grain and a small adjacent zone of soil where most P occurs as insoluble fertilizer compounds and possibly as compounds precipitated from fertilizer solution (2) an inner region where both precipitates and P adsorbed on to the soil at about the maximum adsorption value are present and (3) an outer region where all the added P is adsorbed on to the soil at levels less than the maximum adsorption value.

The desorption of fertilizer P from soil in 0.01M CaCl2 solution at different solution:soil ratios as a function of total soil P followed a relationship of the type Y = aXb where Y is desorbed P and X is adsorbed P. For both soils the values of exponent (b) decreased and tended to unity as the solution:soil ratio increased. A much higher proportion of total P (1.5–3 fold) was desorbed from the podzol as compared to the laterite.

The results of the greenhouse trial showed that P from soil reacted at three P concentrations corresponding to the three discrete zones surrounding fertilizer grains was equally available. This result was obtained for two successive wheat crops for both the soils. When the P fertilized soil was banded it was much more effective (about 3 to 5 times for the laterite and 2 to 3 times for the podzol) than when mixed through the soil.

Key words

P adsorption P desorption fertilizer dissolution P diffusion P availability to wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alvey N, Galwey N and Lane P (1982) An introduction to Genstat, London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AOAC (1975) Official methods of analysis, 12th edn Washington DC: Association of Official Agricultural ChemistsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber SA (1980) Soil-plant interactions in the phosphorus nutrition of plants. In: Khasawneh FE, Sample EC and Kamprath EJ (eds) The role of phosphorus in agriculture, pp 591–615, Madison Wisc: Am Soc AgronGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrow NJ (1979) The description of desorption of phosphate from soil. J Soil Sci 30:259–270Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrow NJ and Shaw TC (1975) The slow reactions between soil and anions: 5 Effects of period of prior contact on the desorption of phosphate from soils. Soil Sci 119:311–320Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrow NJ and Shaw TC (1979) Effects of solution:soil ratio and vigour of shaking on the rate of phosphate adsorption by soil. J Soil Sci 30:67–76Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bolland MDA and Bowden JW (1984) The initial and residual value for subterranean clover of phosphorus from Crandallite rock phosphates, apatite rock phosphates and superphosphate. Fertilizer Research 5:295–307Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boltz DF and Lueck CH (1958) Phosphorus. In: Boltz DF (ed) Colorimetric determination of non-metals. New York: Interscience publishersGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouldin DR (1961) Mathematical description of diffusion processes in soil-plant system. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 25:476–480Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouldin DR, Lehr JR and Sample EC (1960) The effect of associated salts on transformation of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate at the site of application. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24:464–468Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouldin DR and Sample EC (1959) Laboratory and greenhouse studies with monocalcium, monoammonium and diammonium phosphate. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:338–342Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Debnath NC and Mandal SK (1982) Inorganic transformations of added phosphorus in soil and the relative availability of the reaction products as influenced by ageing. Agrochimica 26:293–303Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finney JR and Knight BAG (1973) The effect of soil physical conditions produced by various cultivation systems on the root development of Winter Wheat. J Agric Sci Camb 80:435–442Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilkes RJ and Lim-Nunez R (1980) Poorly soluble phosphates in Australian superphosphate: their nature and availability to plants. Aust J Soil Res 18:85–95Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gilkes RJ and Mangano P (1983) Poorly soluble, iron—aluminium phosphates in ammonium phosphate fertilizers: their nature and availability to plants. Aust J Soil Res 21:183–194Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawton K and Vomocil JA (1954) The dissolution and migration of phosphorus from granular superphosphate in some Michigan soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 18:26–32Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehr JR, Brown WE and Brown EH (1959) Chemical behaviour of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:3–7Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindsay WL, Frazier AW and Stephenson HF (1962) Identification of reaction products from phosphate fertilizers in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 26:446–452Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lindsay WL, Lehr JR and Stephenson HF (1959) Nature of the reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils: III. Studies with metastable triple point solution. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:342–345Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loneragan JF and Asher CJ (1967) Response of plants to phosphate concentration in solution culture: II Rate of phosphate absorption and its relation to growth. Soil Sci 103:311–318Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moreno EC, Brown WE and Osborn G (1960) Solubility of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate in aqueous systems. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24:94–98Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Munson RD and Doll JP (1959) The economics of fertilizer use in crop production. Adv Agron 11:133–169Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murphy J and Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nye PH (1968) The use of exchange isotherms to determine diffusion coefficients in soil. Int Congr Soil Sci Trans 9th (Adelaide, Aust) 1, 117–126Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olsen SR and Watanabe FS (1957) A method to determine a phosphorus adsorption maxima of soils as measured by the Langmuir isotherm. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 21:144–149Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palmer B, Bolland MDA and Gilkes RJ (1979) A re-evaluation of the effectiveness of calcined Christmas Island C-grade rock phosphate. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 19:605–610Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sample EC, Soper RJ and Racz GJ (1980) Reactions of phosphate fertilizers in soils. In: Khasawneh FE, Sample EC and Kamprath EJ (eds) The role of phosphorus in agriculture, pp 263–309. Madison, Wisc: Am Soc AgronGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shear GM and Moschler WW (1969) Continuous corn by the no-tillage and conventional tillage methods: a six year comparison. Agron J 61:524–527Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Siradz AS (1985) Distribution, properties and phosphorus requirements of soils of the Cobiac valley, Darling Range, Western Australia. M Sc (Agric) Thesis Uni West Aust, Nedlands AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sleight DM, Sander DH and Peterson GA (1984) Effect of fertilizer phosphorus placement on the availability of phosphorus. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:336–340Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agriculture Handbook No 436: US DEP AgricGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stace HCT, Hubble GD, Brewer R, Northcote KH, Sleeman JR, Mulcahy MJ and Hallsworth EG (1968) A handbook of Australian soils. Glenside, South Australia: Rellim Tech PublGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tinker PB (1981) Root distribution and nutrient uptake. In Russell RS, Igue K and Mehta YR (eds) The soil/root system in relation to Brazilian agriculture, pp 115–136: Fundaçăo Instituto Agronômico Do ParanáGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Triplett GB Jr and VanDoren DM Jr (1969) Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization of non-tilled maize. Agron J 61:637–639Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weast RC and Astle MJ (eds) (1982) CRC handbook of Chemistry and Physics 63rd edn Florida: CRC Press IncGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Williams CH (1971) Reactions of surface applied superphosphate with soil II. Movement of the phosphorus and sulphur into the soil. Aust J Soil Res 9:95–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Benbi
    • 1
  • R. J. Gilkes
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil Science and Plant Nutrition GroupUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations