Fertilizer research

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 193–202 | Cite as

The influence of rate and time of nitrate supply on nitrogen fixation and yield in pea (Pisum sativum L.)

  • ES Jensen


The influence of nitrate N supply on dry matter production, N content and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soil-grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) was studied in a pot experiment by means of15N fertilizer dilution. In pea receiving no fertilizer N symbiotic nitrogen fixation, soil and seed-borne N contributed with 82, 13 and 5% of total plant N, respectively. The supply of low rates of nitrate fertilizer at sowing (“starter N”) increased the vegetative dry matter production, but not the seed yield significantly. Nitrogen fixation was not significantly decreased by the lower rates of nitrate but higher rates supplied at sowing reduced the nitrogen fixation considerably. Applying nitrate N at the flat pod growth stage increased the yield of seed dry matter and N about 30% compared to pea receiving no nitrate fertilizer. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation was reduced only about 11%, compared with unfertilized pea, by the lowest rate of nitrate at this application time. The pea very efficiently took up and assimilated the nitrate N supplied. The average fertilizer N recovery was 82%. The later the N was supplied the more efficiently it was recovered. When nitrate was supplied at the flat pod growth stage 88% was recovered, and 90% of this N was located in the seeds.

Key words

15N fertilizer dilution nitrate-N nitrogen fixation pea yield 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersen AJ, Haahr V, Jensen ES and Sandfœr J (1984) Effect of N-fertiliser on yield, protein content, and symbiotic N fixation inPisum sativum L. grown in pure stand and mixtures with barley. In Thompson R and Casey R (eds) Perspectives for Peas and Lupins as Protein Crops. 205–217. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bremner JM and Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-Total. In Page AL (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. 595–641. Madison, Wisc, Am Soc of AgronGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fiedler R and Proksch G (1975) The determination of nitrogen-15 by emission and mass spectrometry in biochemical analysis: a review. An Chim Acta 78:1–62Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fried M and Broeshart H (1975) An independent measurement of the amount of nitrogen fixed by a legume crop. Plant Soil 43:707–711Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fried M and Broeshart H (1981) A further extension of the method for independently measuring the amount of nitrogen fixed by a legume crop. Plant Soil 62:331–336Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garcia RL and Hanway JJ (1976) Foliar fertilization of soybeans during the seedfilling period. Agron J 68:653–657Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harper JE and Cooper RL (1971) Nodulation response of soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) to application rate and placement of combined nitrogen. Crop Sci 11:438–440Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Houwaard F (1979) Effect of combined nitrogen on symbiotic nitrogen fixation in pea plants. 95 p. Dissertation (Ph.D.), University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawrie AC and Wheeler CT (1974) The effects of flowering and fruit formation on the supply of photosynthetic assimilates to the nodules ofPisum sativum L. relation to the fixation of nitrogen. New Phytol 73:1119–1127Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahon JD (1977) Respiration and the energy requirement for nitrogen fixation in nodulated pea roots. Plant Physiol 60:817–821Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahon JD and Child JJ (1979) Growth response of inoculated peas (Pisum sativum) to combined N. Can J Bot 57:1687–1693Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mil M van (1981) Actual and potential nitrogen fixation in pea and field bean as affected by combined nitrogen. Dissertation (Ph.D.) 128 p. University of Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oghoghorie CGO and Pate JS (1971) The nitrate stress syndrome of the nodulated field pea (Pisum arvense L.). Techniques for measurement and evaluation in physiological terms. In Lie TA and Mulder EG (eds) Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Natural and Agricultural Habitats, 185–202. Plant Soil, Spec Vol. Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pate JS (1977) Nodulation and nitrogen metabolism. In Sutcliffe JF and Pate JS (eds) The Physiology of the Garden Pea, 349–383. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richards JE and Soper RJ (1979) Effect of N-fertilizer on yield, protein content, and symbiotic N fixation in fababeans. Agron J 71:807–811Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rigaud J (1981) Comparison of the efficiency of nitrate and nitrogen fixation in crop yield. In Bewley JD (ed) Nitrogen and Carbon Metabolism, 17–48. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schilling G, Schalldach I and Polz S (1967) Neue Ergebnisse über die N-Düngung zu Leguminosen, erzielt auf der Grundlage von Versuchen mit dobbelt15N markiertem NH4NO3. Wissenschaft Z Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena 16:385–389Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schrader LE and Thomas RJ (1981) Nitrate uptake, reduction and transport in the whole plant. In Bewley JD (ed) Nitrogen and Carbon Metabolism, 49–91, Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Witty JF, Roughley RJ and Day JM (1980) Reduction of yield ofVicia faba by foliar fertilization during the seed-filling period. J Agri Sci Camb 94:741–743Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • ES Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural Research DepartmentRisø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations