Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

The influence of age and experience with conspecifics on territorial behavior inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Ary A. Hoffmann
Article

Abstract

Drosophila melanogastermales initiated aggressive behavior toward other males and defended territories several hours after they were able to court and mate females. Males that were 3 days or more posteclosion were more successful at holding territories than younger males. Three-day-old males established territories more readily and escalated more often against territory residents than males that were 1 day old. Residents did not usually force young males from territories until they were a few hours posteclosion. The development of territorial behavior was not affected by familiarity or prior exposure to females. Males held in isolation established territories more quickly and behaved more aggressively than males held in groups. Males that previously held territories were more likely to reestablish them after a disturbance.

Key words

Drosophila melanogaster territoriality age aggressive behavior experience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caro, T. M., and Bateson, P. (1986). Organization and ontogeny of alternative tactics.Anim. Behav. 34: 1483–1499.Google Scholar
  2. Ellis, L. B., and Kessler, S. (1975). Differential posteclosion housing experiences and reproduction inDrosophila.Anim. Behav. 23: 949–952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoffmann, A. A. (1987a). A laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Anim. Behav. 35: 807–818.Google Scholar
  4. Hoffmann, A. A. (1987b). Territorial encounters betweenDrosophila males of different sizes.Anim. Behav. 35: 1899–1901.Google Scholar
  5. Hoffmann, A. A. (1988). Heritable variation for territorial success in twoDrosophila melanogaster populations.Anim. Behav. 36: 1180–1189.Google Scholar
  6. Hoffmann, A. A., and Cacoyianni, Z. (1989). Selection for territoriality inDrosophila melanogaster. Correlated responses in mating success and other fitness components.Anim. Behav. 38: 23–34.Google Scholar
  7. Jacobs, M. E. (1960). Influence of light on mating ofDrosophila melanogaster.Ecology 41: 182–188.Google Scholar
  8. Jallon, J.-M. (1984). A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophila during courtship and mating.Behav. Genet. 14: 441–478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jallon, J.-M., Antony, C., and Benemar, O. (1981). Un antiaphrodisiac produit par les mâles deDrosophila melanogaster et transferé aux femelles lors de la copulation.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 292: 1147–1149.Google Scholar
  10. Knoppien, P. (1987). Rare-male advantage: An artifact caused by differential storage conditions?Behav. Genet. 17: 409–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mane, S. D., Tompkins, L., and Richmond, R. C. (1983). Male esterase 6 catalyzes the synthesis of a sex pheromone inDrosophila melanogaster females.Science 222: 419–421.Google Scholar
  12. Manning, A., and Johnstone, G. (1970). The effects of early adult experience on the development of aggressiveness in males of the cockroach,Nauphoeta cinerea.Rev. Comp. Animal 4: 12–16.Google Scholar
  13. McRobert, S. P., and Tompkins, L. (1983). Courtship of young males is ubiquitous inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 13: 517–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore, A. J., Ciccone, W. J., and Breed, M. D. (1988). The influence of social experience on the behavior of male cockroaches,Nauphoeta cinerea.J. Insect Behav. 1: 157–168.Google Scholar
  15. Rosewell, J., and Shorrocks, B. (1987). The implication of survival rates in natural populations ofDrosophila: Capture-recapture experiments on domestic species.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32: 373–384.Google Scholar
  16. Skrzipek, K. H., Kroner, B., and Hager, H. (1979). Aggression beiDrosophila melanogaster — Laboruntersuchungen.Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 87–103.Google Scholar
  17. Spieth, H. T. (1974). Courtship behavior in Drosophila.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19: 385–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tompkins, L. (1984). Genetic analysis of sex appealin Drosophila.Behav. Genet. 14: 411–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Waage, J. K. (1973). Reproductive behavior and its relation to territoriality inCalopteryx maculata (Beauvois) (Odontata: Calopterygidae).Behaviour 47: 240–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ary A. Hoffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Human VariationLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations