Social Justice Research

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 217–231 | Cite as

Ideological stratification: American beliefs about economic justice

  • Norma J. Shepelak


By integrating systematically the common themes in the stratification and justice literatures, researchers have sought to advance our understanding of the role of ideologies in legitimating inequality. This paper examines how beliefs about meritocracy and opportunity in American society relate to the way people think about reducing income differences between the rich and the poor. Using a national sample of U.S. adults (N=1473), we find that the majority of the respondents believe that America has an open system where achievement is tied to individual abilities and educational opportunities. On the other hand the respondents are split in their views on meritocracy, with 50% believing that an individual's high socioeconomic position is reflective of special abilities. The role of ideologies in influencing beliefs about economic justice is direct in that persons who believe in the tenets of equal opportunity and meritocracy are not in favor of reducing income differences between the rich and the poor. Additionally, stratal differences in beliefs about economic justice are seen, with disadvantaged individuals more likely to question the legitimacy of inequality.

Key words

ideologies stratification meritocracy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alves, W., and Rossi, P. (1978). Who should get what?: Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 541–564.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (1972). On meritocracy and equality.Public Interest 29: 29–68.Google Scholar
  3. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Good, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M., and Lerner, S. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173–202.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, K., Hegtvedt, K., and Yamagishi, T. (1988). Structural inequality, legitimation, and reactions to inequity in exchange networks. In Webster, M., and Foschi, M. (eds.),Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 291–308.Google Scholar
  5. Della Fave, L. R. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of social stratification.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 955–971.Google Scholar
  6. Feagin, J. (1975).Subordinating the Poor: Welfare and American Beliefs, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Form, W., and Hanson, C. (1985). The consistency of stratal ideologies of economic justice.Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobility 4: 239–269.Google Scholar
  8. Form, W., and Rytina, J. (1969). Ideological beliefs on the distribution of power in the United States.Am. Sociol. Rev. 34: 19–31.Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. (1982).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Gurin, P., Miller, A., and Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 43: 30–47.Google Scholar
  11. Hochschild, J. (1981).What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Huber, J., and Form, W. (1973).Income and Ideology: An Analysis of the American Political Formula, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Jackman, M., and Muha, M. (1984). Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement?Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 751–769.Google Scholar
  14. Jasso, G., and Rossi, P. (1977). Distributive justice and earned income.Am. Sociol. Rev. 42: 639–651.Google Scholar
  15. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 3–32.Google Scholar
  16. Kluegel, J., and Smith, E. (1981). Beliefs about stratification.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 7: 29–56.Google Scholar
  17. Kluegel, J., and Smith, E. (1986).Beliefs About Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought to Be, Aldine De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Lane, R. (1959). The fear of inequality.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 53: 35–51.Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, M. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Lerner, M., and Lerner, S. (1981).The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Lincoln, J., and Kalleberg, A. (1985). Work organization and workforce commitment: A study of plants and employees in the U.S. and Japan.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 738–760.Google Scholar
  22. Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 822–839.Google Scholar
  23. National Opinion Research Center. 1984.General Social Survey, 1984, National Opinion Research Center, Chicago. (Distributed by Roper Public Opinion Research Center, Yale University, New Haven.)Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, R. and Bell, W. (1978). Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 125–143.Google Scholar
  25. Runciman, W. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  26. Ryan, W. (1981). Equality, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Rytina, J., Form, W., and Pease, J. (1970). Income and stratification ideology: Beliefs about American opportunity structure.Am. J. Sociol. 75: 703–716.Google Scholar
  28. Sennett, R., and Cobb, J. (1972).The Hidden Injuries of Class, Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Shepelak, N. (1987). The role of self-explanations and self-evaluations in legitimating inequality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 495–503.Google Scholar
  30. Shepelak, N., and Alwin, D. (1986). Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 30–46.Google Scholar
  31. Stolte, J. (1983). The legitimation of structural inequality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 331–342.Google Scholar
  32. Stolte, J. (1987). The formation of justice norms.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 774–784.Google Scholar
  33. Thurow, L. (1975).Generating Inequality: Mechanisms of Distribution in the U.S. Economy, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norma J. Shepelak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyWright State UniversityDayton

Personalised recommendations