Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 49–70 | Cite as

Procedural justice in managerial selection: Identification of fairness determinants and associations of fairness perceptions

  • M. S. Singer
Article

Abstract

The study examined procedural fairness in managerial selection practices. A sample of professional managers were asked to make first, fairness judgments about managerial selection procedures in general; and second, specific fairness judgments based on their own previous experiences in applying for such positions. Using the general fairness ratings, the determinants of procedural fairness in selection were identified by the factor analysis technique. Five procedural factors (three process and two decision factors) accounted for 57.4% of the total variance. The factor scores derived from fairness ratings of specific selection procedures were then correlated with ratings of candidates' later organizational commitment, work satisfaction, and perceptions of organizational effectiveness. Results showed that process factors were significantly associated with candidate variables but decision factors were not. The findings were discussed in the context of current procedural justice theories.

Key words

procedural justice selection perceived fairness economic justice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 117–198.Google Scholar
  3. Arvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects.Psychol Bull. 86: 736–765.Google Scholar
  4. Arvey, R. D., and Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research.Personnel Psychol. 35: 281–322.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, T. E., and Klimoski, R. J. (1989). A field study of the relationship between the organizational feedback environment and performance.Personnel Psychol. 42: 343–358.Google Scholar
  6. Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 2, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  7. Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments.Acad. Manag. J. 31: 676–685.Google Scholar
  8. Brockner, J. (1990). Scope of justice in the workplace: How survivors react to co-worker lay-offs.J. Soc. Issues 46: 95–106.Google Scholar
  9. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychol. Rev. 83: 85–113.Google Scholar
  10. Crosby, F. (1984). Relative deprivation in organizational settings. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 51–93.Google Scholar
  11. Dickey-Bryant, L., Lautenschlager, G. J., Mendoza, J. L., and Abrahams, N. (1986). Facial attractiveness and its relation to occupational success.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 16–19.Google Scholar
  12. Donaldson, T., and Werhane, P. H. (1983).Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Dunnette, M. D., and Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel selection and classification systems.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 30: 477–525.Google Scholar
  14. Eder, R. W., and Buckley, M. R. (1988). The employment interview: An interactionist perspective. In Ferris, G. R., and Rowland, K. M. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 6, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 75–107.Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, C. (1987). Candidate personality as an influence on selection interview assessments.Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 36: 157–162.Google Scholar
  16. Fletcher, C. (1991). Candidates' reactions to assessment centres and their outcomes: A longitudinal study.J. Occp. Psychol. 64: 117–127.Google Scholar
  17. Folger, R., and Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K., and Ferris, G. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–183.Google Scholar
  18. Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Acad. Manage. J. 32: 115–130.Google Scholar
  19. Freedman, S. M., and Montanari, J. R. (1980). An integrative model of managerial reward allocation.Acad. Manage. Rev. 5: 381–390.Google Scholar
  20. Fryxell, G. E., and Gordon, M. E. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union and management.Head. Manage. J. 32: 851–866.Google Scholar
  21. Gomersall, E. R., and Myers, M. S. (1966). Breakthrough in on-the-job training.Harvard Business Rev., pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Greenberg, J. (1987a). A taxonomy of organisational justice theories.Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9–22.Google Scholar
  24. Greenberg, J. (1987b). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means.J. Appl. Psychol. 72: 340–342.Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg, J. (1987c). Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 219–234.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. (ed.),Basic Group Process Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 235–256.Google Scholar
  27. Guion, R. M. (1987). Changing views for personnel selection research.Personnel Psychology 40, 199–213.Google Scholar
  28. Guion, R. M., and Gibson, W. M. (1988). Personnel selection and placement.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 39: 349–374.Google Scholar
  29. Harris, M. M., and Fink, L. S. (1987). A field study of applicant reactions to employment opportunities: Does the recruiter make a difference?Personnel Psychol. 40: 765–784.Google Scholar
  30. Hartigan, J. A., and Wigdor, A. K. (1989).Fairness in Employment Testing National Academic Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Heilman, M. E., Rivero, J. C., and Brett, J. F. (1991). Skirting the competence issue: Effects of sex-based selection on task choices of women and men.J. Appl. Psychol. 76: 99–105.Google Scholar
  32. Hitt, M. A., and Barr, S. H. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing.J. Appl. Psychol. 74: 53–61.Google Scholar
  33. Herriot, P. (1989). Selection as a social process. In Smith, M., and Robertson, I. T. (eds.),Advances in Selection and Assessment Wiley, Chichester, England, pp. 171–188.Google Scholar
  34. Hough, L. M. (1988). Development of personality measures to supplement selection decisions. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference of International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  35. Houston, W. M., and Novick, M. R. (1987). Race-based differential prediction in Air Force technical training programs.J. Educ. Measur. 24: 309–320.Google Scholar
  36. Howard, A. (1986). College experiences and managerial performance.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 530–552.Google Scholar
  37. Hunter, J. E., and Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychol. Bull. 96: 72–98.Google Scholar
  38. Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J., Earley, P. C., and Lind, E. A. (1987). Participation in task evaluation procedures: The effects of influential opinion expression and knowledge of evaluative criteria on attitudes and performance.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 235–249.Google Scholar
  39. Karambayya, R., and Brett, J. M. (1989). Managers handling disputes: Third-party roles and perceptions of fairness.Acd. Manage. J. 32: 687–704.Google Scholar
  40. Keenan, A. (1978). The selection interview: Candidates' reactions and interviewers' judgements.Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 17: 201–209.Google Scholar
  41. Key Business Directory of Australia. (1990). Vol. 1, Dun and Bradstreet, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  42. Kinicki, A. J., and Lockwood, C. A. (1985). The interview process: An examination of factors recruiters use in evaluating job applicants.J. Vocat. Behav. 26: 117–125.Google Scholar
  43. Kirnan, J. P., Farley, J. A., and Geisinger, K. F. (1989). The relationship between recruiting source, applicant quality, and hire performance: An analysis by sex, ethnicity and age.Personnel Psychol. 42: 293–308.Google Scholar
  44. Klaas, B. S. (1989). Determinants of grievance activity and the grievance system's impact on employee behavior: An integrative perspective.Acad. Manage. Rev. 32: 705–717.Google Scholar
  45. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.J. Pers. 45: 1–52.Google Scholar
  46. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar
  47. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., and Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Milula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 167–218.Google Scholar
  48. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., and Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 13: 338–350.Google Scholar
  50. Lissak, R. I., Mendes, H., and Lind, E. A. (1983). Organizational and non-organizational influences on attitudes towards work. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Champaign.Google Scholar
  51. Martin, J. (1981). Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 53–107.Google Scholar
  52. McEnrue, M. P. (1989). The perceived fairness of managerial promotion practices.Hum. Rel. 42: 815–827.Google Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, I. R., Gellatly, R. D., Goffin, R. D., and Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts.J. Appl. Psychol. 74: 152–156.Google Scholar
  54. Miner, M. (1976).Selection Procedures and Personnel Records Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  55. Nacoste, R. W., and Lehman, D. (1987). Procedural stigma.Represent. Res. Soc. Psychol. 17: 25–38.Google Scholar
  56. Noe, R. A., and Steffy, B. D. (1987). The influence of individual characteristics and assessment center evaluation on career exploration behavior and job involvement.J. Vocat. Behav. 30: 187–202.Google Scholar
  57. Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P., and Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Proc. 41: 180–195.Google Scholar
  58. Phillips, A. P., and Dipboye, R. L. (1989). Correctional tests of predictions from a process model of the interview.J. Appl. Psychol. 74: 41–52.Google Scholar
  59. Premack, S. L., and Wanous, J. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments.J. Appl. Psychol. 70: 706–719.Google Scholar
  60. Pulakos, E. D., Borman, W. C., and Hough, L. M. (1988). Test validation for scientific understanding: Two demonstrations of an approach to studying predictor-criterion linkages.Personnel Psychol. 41: 703–716.Google Scholar
  61. Rothstein, M., and Jackson, D. N. (1984). Implicit personality theory and the employment interview. In Cook, M. (ed.),Issues in Person Perception Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  62. Schmidt, F. L. (1988). Validity generalization and the future of criterion-related validity. In Wainer, H., and Braun, H. J. (eds.).Test Validity Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  63. Schwab, D. P., and Heneman, H. G., III. (1977). Effects of age and experience on productivity.Ind. Gerontol. 4: 113–117.Google Scholar
  64. Shaw, B. (1988). Affirmative action: An ethical evaluation.J. Bus. Ethics 7: 763–770.Google Scholar
  65. Singer, M. S. (1992). The application of relative deprivation theory of justice perception of preferential selection.Current Psychol. Res. Rev. 11: in press.Google Scholar
  66. Singer, M. S., and Bruhns, C. (1991). Relative effect of applicant work experience and academic qualification on selection interview decisions: A study of between-sample generalizability.J. Appl. Psychol. 76: 550–559.Google Scholar
  67. Singer, M. S., and Eder, G. (1989). Effects of ethnicity, accent, and job status on selection decisions.Int. J. Psychol. 24: 13–34.Google Scholar
  68. Singer, M. S., and Sewell, C. (1989). Applicant age and selection interview decisions: Effects of information exposure on age discrimination in personnel selection.Personnel Psychol. 42: 135–154.Google Scholar
  69. Taylor, M. S., and Bergmann, T. J. (1987). Organizational recruitment activities and applicants' reactions at different stages of the recruitment process.Personnel Psychol. 40: 267–285.Google Scholar
  70. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  71. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure.California Law Rev. 66: 541–566.Google Scholar
  72. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgements of procedural justice: A test of four models.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 333–344.Google Scholar
  73. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. (1978).Fed. Register 43: 38290–38315.Google Scholar
  74. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  75. Wanous, J. P. (1980).Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection, and Socialization of Newcomers Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  76. Wanous, J. P. (1989). Installing a realistic job preview: Ten tough choices.Personnel Psychol. 42: 117–134.Google Scholar
  77. Weiss, D. J., and Davison, N. L. (1981). Test theory and methods.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 32: 629–658.Google Scholar
  78. Whiddon, B., and Martin, P. Y. (1989). Organizational democracy and work quality in a state welfare agency.Soc. Sci. Quart. 70: 667–686.Google Scholar
  79. Zeidner, M. (1988). Cultural fairness in aptitude testing revisited: A cross-cultural parallel.Prof. Psychol. 19: 257–262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Singer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CanterburyChrischurch 1New Zealand

Personalised recommendations