Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 4, Issue 5, pp 649–660

The role of queen mandibular pheromone and colony congestion in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) reproductive swarming (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  • Mark L. Winston
  • Heather A. Higo
  • Simon J. Colley
  • Tanya Pankiw
  • Keith N. Slessor
Article

Abstract

The roles of honey bee queen mandibular pheromone and colony congestion in the inhibition of swarming were investigated. Two colony siz.es were used: small, congested colonies and large, uncongested colonies. Both groups of colonies were treated with various dosages of the five-component, synthetic queen mandibular pheromone in the spring, and the extent and timing of swarming were followed. Most treatment groups received pheromone or a solvent blank (control) on a stationary slide; one group of the congested colonies received a pheromone treatment via an aerosol spray. The pheromone was not effective at delaying swarming in the congested colonies at any dosage applied on slides, but the aerosol spray-treated colonies swarmed significantly later in the season than the control colonies. The uncongested, pheromone-treated colonies exhibited a dose-dependent delay in swarming, with the highest dosage colonies swarming almost four weeks later than the control colonies. These results indicate an interaction between congestion and pheromone in the control of honey bee reproduction. While congestion may in itself be a factor stimulating swarming, these results are consistent with the interpretation that colony congestion reduces the transmission of queen pheromone within the nest, thereby removing the queen 's pheromone-based inhibition of queen rearing and subsequent swarming by workers.

Key words

honey bee pheromone swarming queen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butler, C. G. (1959). Queen substance.Bee World 40: 269–275.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, C. G. (1960). The significance of queen substance in swarming and supersedure in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies.Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. A 35: 129–132.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, C. G. (1961). The scent of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera) that causes partial inhibition of queen rearing.J. Insect Physiol. 7: 258–264.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, C. G., and Callow, R. K. (1968). Pheromones of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.): The “inhibitory scent” of the queen.Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Land. A 43: 62–65.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, C. G., and Paton, P. N. (1962). Inhibition of queen rearing by queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) of different ages.Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. A 37: 114–116.Google Scholar
  6. Demuth, G. S. (1921). Swarm control.Farm. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agr. 1198: 1–28.Google Scholar
  7. Gerstung, F. (1891).Der Bien und Seine Zucht, Pfenningstorff, Berlin.Google Scholar
  8. Huber, F. (1792).New Observations on Bees, Vol. 1 (transl. 1926), Dadant, Hamilton, Ill.Google Scholar
  9. Kaminski, L.-A., Slessor, K. N., Winston, M. L., Hay, N. W., and Borden, J. H. (1990). Honey bee response to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays.J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 841–850.Google Scholar
  10. Lensky, Y., and Siefert, H. (1980). The effect of volume, ventilation, and overheating of bee colonies on the construction of swarming queen cups and cells.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 67a: 97–101.Google Scholar
  11. Lensky, Y., and Slabezki, Y. (1981). The inhibiting effect of the queen bee (Apis mellifera L.) foot-print pheromone on the construction of swarming queen cups.J. Insect Physiol. 27: 313–323.Google Scholar
  12. Morland, D. (1930). On the causes of swarming in the honeybee: An examination of the brood food theory.Ann. Appl. Biol. 17: 137–147.Google Scholar
  13. Seeley, T. D. (1979). Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honeybee colonies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 391–415.Google Scholar
  14. Seeley, T. D. (1985).Honeybee Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  15. Simpson, J. (1957). The incidence of swarming among colonies of honey-bees in England.J. Agr. Sci. 49: 387–393.Google Scholar
  16. Simpson, J. (1958). The factors which cause colonies ofApis mellifera to swarm.Insectes Soc. 5: 77–95.Google Scholar
  17. Slessor, K. N., Kaminski, L.-A., King, G. G. S., Borden, J. H., and Winston, M. L. (1988). Semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen honey bees.Nature 332: 354–356.Google Scholar
  18. Slessor, K. N., Kaminski, L.-A., King, G. G. S., and Winston, M. L. (1990). Semiochemicals of the honey bee queen mandibular glands.J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 851–860.Google Scholar
  19. Velthuis, H. H. W. (1970). Queen substances from the abdomen of the honey bee queen.Z. vergl. Physiol. 70: 210–222.Google Scholar
  20. Willis, L. G., Winston, M. L., and Slessor, K. N. (1990). The effect of queen honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) mandibular pheromone on worker ovary development.Can. Entomol. 122: 1093–1099.Google Scholar
  21. Winston, M. L. (1987).The Biology of the Honey Bee, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  22. Winston, M. L., and Taylor, O. R. (1980). Factors preceding queen rearing in the Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera) in South America.Insectes Soc. 27: 289–304.Google Scholar
  23. Winston, M. L. Taylor, O. R., and Otis, G. W. (1980). Swarming, colony growth patterns, and bee management.Am. Bee J. 120: 826–830.Google Scholar
  24. Winston, M. L., Slessor, K. N., Willis, L. G., Naumann, K., Higo, H. A., Wyborn, M. H., and Kaminski, L.-A. (1989). The influence of queen mandibular pheromones on worker attraction to swarm clusters and inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.).Insectes Soc. 36: 15–27.Google Scholar
  25. Winston, M. L., Higo, H. A., and Slessor, K. N. (1990). The effect of various dosages of queen mandibular pheromone on the inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83: 234–238.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark L. Winston
    • 1
  • Heather A. Higo
    • 1
  • Simon J. Colley
    • 1
  • Tanya Pankiw
    • 1
  • Keith N. Slessor
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry/BiochemistrySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations