Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 4, Issue 5, pp 633–647 | Cite as

Biparental care in incipient colonies of the dampwood termiteZootermopsis angusticollis Hagen (Isoptera: Termopsidae)

  • Rebeca B. Rosengaus
  • James F. A. Traniello
Article

Abstract

Parental care and division of labor in male and female primary reproductives in incipient colonies of the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticolliswere studied by recording repertory sizes, behavior frequencies, time budgets, and transition probabilities of acts. Repertory sizes for males and females were identical, and behaviors were performed at similar frequencies. Time budget data also suggested equal participation in parental care by both sexes. Transition probability analysis suggested that males and females did not organize their behavior in roles. We therefore found no indication of sex-based division of labor during colony foundation and the incipient stages of colony growth. The lack of behavioral specialization may be due to the fact that acts might be related and/or have more than one function, and different tasks are not spatially associated. Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that monogamous mating systems in termites involve mate assistance.

Key words

termite parental care polyethism social behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basallingappa, S. (1970). Environmental hazards to reproductives ofOdontotermes assmuthi Holmgren.Indian Zool. 1: 45–50.Google Scholar
  2. Buchli, H. (1950). Recherche sur la fondation et le developpement des nouvelles colonies chez le termite lucifuge (Reticulitermes lucifugus Rossi).Physiol. Comparata Oecol. 2: 145–160.Google Scholar
  3. Calabi, P. (1988). Behavioral flexibility in Hymenoptera: A re-examination of the concept of caste. In Trager, J. C. (ed.),Advances in Myrmecology, Brill Press, Leiden, pp. 237–258.Google Scholar
  4. Calabi, P., and Traniello, J. F. A. (1989). Social organization in the antPheidole dentata. Physical and temporal caste ratios lack ecological correlates.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 69–78.Google Scholar
  5. Castle, G. B. (1934). The dampwood termites of western United States, genusZootermopsis (formerlyTermopsis). In Kofoid, C. A. (ed.),Termites and Termite Control, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 273–310.Google Scholar
  6. Clément, G. (1956). Premieres étapes du developpement de la colonie chezAnacanthotermes ochraceus Burm.Bull. Soc. Entomol. 61: 98–103.Google Scholar
  7. Deligne, J., Quennedy, A., and Blum, M. S. (1981). The enemies and defense mechanisms of termites. In Hermann, H. R. (ed.),Social Insects, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 2–76.Google Scholar
  8. Dial, K. P., and Vaughan, T. A. (1987). Opportunistic predation on alate termites in Kenya.Biotropica 19: 185–187.Google Scholar
  9. Fagen, R. M., and Goldman, R. N. (1977). Behavioural catalogue analysis methods.Anim. Behav. 25: 261–271.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, C. (1915). Observations on some South African termites.Ann. Natal Mus. 3: 329–505.Google Scholar
  11. Garnier-Sillam, E. (1983). Le polyethisme chezReticulitermes lucifugus santonensis (Isoptera-Rhinotermitidae).Insectes Soc. 30: 9–26.Google Scholar
  12. Herbers, J. M. (1983). Social organization inLeptothorax ants: Within and between species patterns.Psyche 90: 361–386.Google Scholar
  13. Herbers, J. M., and Cunningham, M. (1983). Social organization inLeptothorax longispinosus Mayr.Anim. Behav. 31: 759–771.Google Scholar
  14. Herbers, J. M., Adamowicz, S. C., and Helms, S. D. (1985). Seasonal changes in social organization ofAphaenogaster rudis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Sociobiology 10: 1–15.Google Scholar
  15. Howse, P. E. (1968). On the division of labour in the primitive termiteZootermopsis nevadensis (Hagen).Insectes Soc. 15: 45–50.Google Scholar
  16. King, E. G., and Spink, W. T. (1975). Development of incipient Formosan subterranean termite colonies in the field.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68: 355–358.Google Scholar
  17. Maynard Smith, J. (1977). Parental investment: A prospective analysis.Anim. Behav. 25: 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. McMahan, E. A. (1970). Polyethism in workers ofNasutitermes costalis Holmgren.Insectes Soc. 17: 113–120.Google Scholar
  19. Nalepa, C. A. (1984). Colony composition, protozoan transfer and some life history characteristics of the woodroachCryptocercus punctulatus Scudder (Dictyoptera: Cryptocercidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 273–279.Google Scholar
  20. Nalepa, C. A., and Jones, S. C. (1991). Evolution of monogamy in termites.Biol. Rev. 66: 83–97.Google Scholar
  21. Nutting, W. L. (1969). Flight and colony foundation. In Krishna, K., and Weesner, F. M. (eds.),Biology of Termites, Academic Press, New York, pp. 233–282.Google Scholar
  22. Oster, G. F., and Wilson, E. O. (1978).Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  23. Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests.Evolution 43: 223–225.Google Scholar
  24. Seelinger, G., and Seelinger, U. (1983). On the social organisation, alarm and fighting in the primitive cockroachCryptocercus punctulatus Scudder.Z. Tierpsychol. 61: 315–333.Google Scholar
  25. Shellman-Reeve, J. S. (1990). Dynamics of biparental care in the dampwood termite,Zootermopsis nevadensis (Hagen): Response to nitrogen availability.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 389–397.Google Scholar
  26. Sheppe, W. (1970). Invertebrate predation on termites of the African savanna.Insectes Soc. 17: 205–218.Google Scholar
  27. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, J. F. (1969).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  28. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Weesner, F. M. (1969). The reproductive system. In Krishna, K., and Weesner, F. M. (eds.),Biology of Termites, Academic Press, New York, pp. 125–160.Google Scholar
  30. Zeh, D. W., and Smith, R. L. (1985). Parental investment by terrestrial arthropods.Am. Zool. 25: 785–805.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebeca B. Rosengaus
    • 1
  • James F. A. Traniello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyBoston UniversityBoston

Personalised recommendations