Public Choice

, Volume 79, Issue 1–2, pp 187–209 | Cite as

Does rain help the Republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote

  • Steve Knack


Conventional political wisdom holds that inclement weather on election day reduces turnout, and helps elect Republican candidates. Analysis of National Climatic Data Center weather records and National Election Studies (NES) survey data for 1984, 1986, and 1988 refutes the latter hypothesis: interaction variables based on various measures of partisanship and election-day rainfall show no evidence of partisan differences in the turnout-deterring impact of inclement weather. Furthermore, rainfall does not significantly reduce the probability of voting for the NES samples as a whole, but only among those respondents scoring low on the standard NES civic duty indicator.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, P.R. and Aldrich, J.H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America.American Political Science Review 76: 502–521.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, B. (1970).Sociologists, economists, and democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Benn, S. (1979). The problematic rationality of political participation. In P. Laslett and J. Fishkin (Eds.)Philosophy, politics, and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, R.W. (1986). Election calendars and voter turnout.American Politics Quarterly 14: 89–104.Google Scholar
  5. Caldeira, G.A. and Patterson, S.C. (1982). Contextual influences on participation in U.S. state legislative elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 359–381.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A. (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change.Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 397–418.Google Scholar
  7. Cebula, R.J. and Murphy, D.R. (1980). The Electoral College and voter participation rates: An explanatory note.Public Choice 35: 185–190.Google Scholar
  8. Conway, M.M. (1981). Political participation in midterm congressional elections: Attitudinal and social characteristics during the 1970s.American Politics Quarterly 9: 221–244.Google Scholar
  9. Council of State Governments (1984–90).The book of the states (Vols. 25–28). Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
  10. DeNardo, J. (1980). Turnout and the vote: The joke's on the Democrats.American Political Science Review 74: 406–420.Google Scholar
  11. DeNardo, J. (1986). Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections? (reply to Tucker and Vedlitz)American Political Science Review 80: 1298–1304.Google Scholar
  12. Durden, G.C. and Gaynor, P. (1987). The rational behavior theory of voter participation: Evidence from the 1970 and 1982 elections.Public Choice 53: 231–242.Google Scholar
  13. Erikson, R.S. (1981). Why do people vote? Because they are registered.American Politics Quarterly 9: 259–276.Google Scholar
  14. Hadley, A.T. (1978).The empty polling booth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Jackman, R.W. (1987). Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies.American Political Science Review 81: 405–423.Google Scholar
  16. Knack, S. (1993). The voter participation effects of selecting jurors from registration lists.Journal of Law and Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  17. Knack, S. (1992). Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout.Rationality and Society 4(2): 133–156.Google Scholar
  18. Ledyard, J.O. (1981). The paradox of voting and candidate competition: A general equilibrium analysis. In G. Horwich and J.P. Quirk (Eds.),Essays in contemporary fields of economics. West Lafayette, In: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ledyard, J.O. (1984). The pure theory of large two-candidate elections.Public Choice 44: 7–41.Google Scholar
  20. Macaluso, T.F. and Wanat, J. (1979). Voting turnout and religiosity.Polity 12: 158–169.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, W.E. and Traugott, S. (1989).American national election studies data sourcebook, 1952–1986. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Morton, R.M. (1991). Groups in rational turnout models.American Journal of Political Science 35: 758–776.Google Scholar
  23. NOAA/National Climatic Data Center.Hourly precipitation data Nov. 1990, Nov. 1988, Nov. 1986, Nov. 1984. Asheville, NC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce.Google Scholar
  24. NOAA/National Climatic Data Center.Local climatological data, monthly summaries Nov. 1988, Nov. 1986, Nov. 1984. Ashville, NC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce.Google Scholar
  25. Palfrey, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1983). A strategic calculus of voting.Public Choice 41: 7–53.Google Scholar
  26. Radcliff, B. and Pudaite, P. (1991, August). The majority party and turnout: A critique and reinterpretation. Mimeo. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Political Science Association annual meeting in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Reiter, H.L. (1979). Why is turnout down?Public Opinion Quarterly 43: 297–311.Google Scholar
  28. Riker, W. and Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting.American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.Google Scholar
  29. Strate, J.M. et al. (1989). Life span civic development and voting participation.American Political Science Review 83: 443–464.Google Scholar
  30. Teixeira, R. (1987).Why Americans don't vote: Turnout decline in the United States, 1960–1984. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tucker, H.J. and Vedlitz, A. (1986). Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections?American Political Science Review 80: 1291–1298.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1986).Voting and registration in the election of November 1984. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 405. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  33. Weisberg, H.F. and Grofman, B. (1981). Candidate evaluations and turnout.American Politics Quarterly 9: 197–219.Google Scholar
  34. Wolfinger, R.E. and Rosenstone, S.J. (1980).Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Knack
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public AffairsAmerican UniversityWashington DC

Personalised recommendations