The influence of state-level economic conditions on the 1992 U.S. presidential election
- 97 Downloads
Evidence is found that state-level economic conditions played a significant role in the defeat of George Bush in the 1992 U.S. presidential election. Evidence is also found which indicates that the entrance of Ross Perot into the race as an independent candidate was not instrumental in the Bush loss.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abrams, B.A. (1980). The influence of state-level economic conditions on presidential elections.Public Choice 35(5): 623–631.Google Scholar
- Kramer, G. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior.The American Political Science Review 65 (March): 131–143.Google Scholar
- Langer, G. (1992). What voters really want from Clinton.The Wall Street Journal (16 November): A10.Google Scholar
- Levernier, W. (1992). The effect of relative economic performance on the outcome of gubernatorial elections.Public Choice 74(2): 181–190.Google Scholar
- Meltzer, A.H. and Vellrath, M. (1975). The effects of economic policies on votes for the presidency: Some evidence from recent elections.Journal of Law and Economics 19 (December): 781–798.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, D.T. and Martinez-Saldivar, M.L. (1979). The effects of land reform on agricultural production, employment and income distribution.The Economic Journal 89 (September): 624–635.Google Scholar
- Peltzman, S. (1987). Economic conditions and gubernatorial elections.The American Economic Review 77(2): 293–297.Google Scholar
- Wright, G. (1974). The political economy of new deal spending: An econometric analysis.Review of Economics and Statistics 56 (February): 30–38.Google Scholar