Public Choice

, Volume 79, Issue 3–4, pp 247–256 | Cite as

The economic theory of regulation and trucking deregulation: Shifting to the state level

  • Paul Teske
  • Samuel Best
  • Michael Mintrom
Article

Abstract

Federal deregulation of the trucking industry in 1980 created a general gain in economic welfare at the expense of the monopoly rents of powerful interests, leading some scholars to ponder the limitations of the economic theory of regulation. However, analyzing only the federal changes excludes evidence from the significant intrastate sector of the trucking industry, regulation of which remains largely unchanged from that prior to 1980. This paper argues that after a decade of clear federal policy success, truckers continue to capture most state regulators, sustaining monopoly rents in what would otherwise be an inherently competitive industry. Using data from the fifty states, we demonstrate the extent to which the economic theory is in fact consistent with trucking industry evidence.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexis, M. (1983). The political economy of federal regulation of surface transportation. In R. Noll and B. Owen (Eds.),The Political Economy of Deregulation. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, W.B. et al. (1991). The impact of state economic regulation of motor carriage on intrastate and interstate commerce. Unpublished manuscript prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, W.B. and Taylor-Brown, C. (1980). Examination of the unregulated trucking experience in Delaware. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
  4. Annable, J. (1973). The ICC, the IBT, and the cartelization of the American trucking industry.Quarterly Review of Economics and Business (Summer): 33–47.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, D. (1983–1990). Your letter of the law. Manuscript. San Francisco: Transportation Lawyers Association.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence.Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 371–400.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, R., Kasserman, M. and McClave, G. (1986). Motor carrier deregulation: The Florida experiment.Review of Economics and Statistics (February).Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J., Tollison, R. and Tullock, G., Eds. (1980).Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, C. (1958).State regulation of commercial motor carriers in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  10. Childs, W. (1985).Trucking and the public interest: The emergence of federal regulation, 1914–1940. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham, W., Rakowski, J. and Southern, N. (1987). Intrastate deregulation in the motor carrier industry: A survey of transportation educators.Transportation Practitioners Journal (Fall): 41–53.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, J. and Beilock, R. (1983). State regulatory responses to federal motor carrier deregulation.University of Florida Law Review 35: 56–79.Google Scholar
  13. Frendreis, J. and Waterman, R. (1985). PAC contributions and legislative behavior: Senate voting on trucking deregulation.Social Science Quarterly 401–412.Google Scholar
  14. Gilligan, T., Marshall, W. and Weingast, B. (1989). Regulation and the theory of legislative choice: The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887.Journal of Law and Economics 32: 35–61.Google Scholar
  15. Hacker, A. (1962). Pressure politics in Pennsylvania: The truckers versus the railroads. In A. Westin (Ed.),The uses of power: Seven cases in American politics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  16. Hilton, G. (1972). The basic behavior of regulatory commissions.American Economic Review 62: 33–47.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, J. and Schneider, K. (1991). The 1980 Motor Carrier Act: A ten-year retrospective by traffic executives.Transportation Practitioners Journal (Summer): 356–374.Google Scholar
  18. Kreuger, A. (1974). The political economy of rent-seeking.American Economic Review 64: 291–303.Google Scholar
  19. MacAvoy, P. and Snow, J. Eds. (1977).Regulation of entry and pricing in truck transportation. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, J., Peck, M., Stenason, J. and Zwick, C. (1959).The economics of competition in the transportation industries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, T.G. (1978). The beneficiaries of trucking regulation.Journal of Law and Economics 21: 327–343.Google Scholar
  22. Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation.Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.Google Scholar
  23. Peltzman, S. (1989). The economic theory of regulation after a decade of deregulation.Brookings Papers: Microeconomics 1989, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  24. Phillips, K.B. and Phillips, L. (1984). Research, politics, and the dynamics of policy development: A case study of motor carrier regulatory reform.Policy Sciences 17: 367–384.Google Scholar
  25. Pustay, M. (1984). Intrastate motor carrier regulatory reform in South Dakota.Transportation Practitioners Journal (Fall): 93–107.Google Scholar
  26. Robyn, D. (1987).Braking the special interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rothenberg, L. (1987). The politics and economics of motor carrier regulation and deregulation. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, N. (1985). The incidence of regulatory rents in the motor carrier industry.Rand Journal of Economics 16: 299–318.Google Scholar
  29. Rose, N. (1987). Labor rent sharing and regulation: Evidence from the trucking industry.Journal of Political Economy 95: 1146–1178.Google Scholar
  30. Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 3–21.Google Scholar
  31. Tullock, G. (1967). Welfare costs of tariffs, monopoly and theft.Western Economic Journal 5: 224–232.Google Scholar
  32. Tye, W. (1987).Encouraging cooperation among competitors: The case of motor carrier deregulation and collective ratemaking. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  33. White, E. (1989). Economic regulation of Oregon intrastate trucking: A policy evaluation.Transportation Law Journal 17: 179–233.Google Scholar
  34. Winston, C., Corsi, T., Grimm, C. and Evans, C. (1990).The economic effects of surface freight deregulation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Teske
    • 1
  • Samuel Best
    • 1
  • Michael Mintrom
    • 1
  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentSUNY Stony BrookStony Brook

Personalised recommendations