Abstract
Most social justice critiques of medical care focus upon the allocation of extant, but scarce, resources. In contrast to that focus, this article explores the preallocative arena of factors which shape the supply and availability of medical care. We identify four such factors: (1)medicalization — the tendency to regard as biologically caused various human problems which were in earlier eras ignored or attributed to other causes; (2)social inclusion — the bringing of economically deprived and socially marginal groups into participation in the medical care system; (3)biomedical transcendence — the elevation of biomedically derived concepts of human function into a social and personal world view; and (4)health absolutism — the ideology which holds individuals accountable for their own health and which, contrary to the thrust of the other factors, deemphasizes access and social equity for professionally provided medical care. While these forces all enhance the place of health as a social value, it is by no means certain that they will lead to a society which is more medically just. The article concludes with an appeal for critical analysis of the processes which shape both the medical care system and the broad social concern with medical care.
Key words
inequality health absolutism health care allocation medicalization social control social justicePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., and Turner, B. S. (1984).The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology Viking Penguin, New York, p. 133.Google Scholar
- Conrad, P. (1975). The discovery of hyperkinesis: Notes on the medicalization of deviant behavior.Soc. Prob. 23(Oct.): 12–21.Google Scholar
- Coreil, J., Levin, J. S., and Jaco, E. G. (1985). Life style — An emergent concept in the sociomedical sciences.Cult. Med. Psychiat. 9: 423–437.Google Scholar
- Entralgo, P. L. (1969).Doctor and Patient McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- Field, M. G. (1989). The health system and the polity: A contemporary American dialectic.Soc. Sci. Med. 14A: 397–413.Google Scholar
- Fox, R. C. (1976). Medical evolution. In Louber, J. J., Baum, R. C., Effrat, E., and Lidz, V. M. (eds.),Explorations in General Theory in Social Science Free Press, New York, pp. 773–787.Google Scholar
- Fox, R. C. (1977). The medicalization and demedicalization of American society.Daedalus 106(1): 9–22.Google Scholar
- Fox, R. C. (1985). Reflections and opportunities in the sociology of medicine.J. Health Soc. Behav. 26(1): 6–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs, V. R. (1979). Economics, health, and post-industrial society.Milbank Mem. Fund Quart. 57: 153–182.Google Scholar
- Graham, S., and Reeder, L. G. (1979). Social epidemiology of chronic diseases. In Freeman, H. E., Levine, S., and Reeder, L. G. (eds.),Handbook of Medical Sociology 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
- Illich, I. (1975).Medical Nemesis Calder and Boyars, London.Google Scholar
- Newman, L. F. (1981). Midwives and modernization.Med. Anthropol. 5: 1–12.Google Scholar
- Raymond, C. A. (1986). Experts hold hope for obesity treatments targeted to specific regulatory miscues.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 256: 2302–2303; 2306–2307.Google Scholar
- Reiser, S. J. (1978).Medicine and the Reign of Technology Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Riessman, C. K. (1983). Women and medicalization: A new perspective.Soc. Pol. 14(Summer): 3–18.Google Scholar
- Searle, C. M. (1984). Health tyranny, health absolutism. University of Kentucky, Lexington. (unpublished)Google Scholar
- Strang, D., and Soysal, Y. (1986). The timing of national education: Nineteenth century Europe. Paper presented at meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York City. (unpublished)Google Scholar
- Titmuss, R. M. (1971).The Gift Relationship — From Human Blood to Social Policy Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Zola, I. K. (1986). Medicine as an institution of social control. In Conrad, P., and Kern, R. (eds.),The Sociology of Health and Illness — Critical Perspectives 2nd ed., St. Martin's Press, New York, pp. 379–390.Google Scholar