Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 48, Issue 2–3, pp 109–125 | Cite as

Quantitative models of the fallout and dispersal of tephra from volcanic eruption columns

  • S. Carey
  • R. S. J. Sparks
Article

Abstract

A theoretical model of clast fallout from convective eruption columns has been developed which quantifies how the maximum clast size dispersal is determined by column height and wind strength. An eruption column consists of a buoyant convecting region which rises to a heightHB where the column density equals that of the atmosphere. AboveHB the column rises further to a heightHT due to excess momentum. BetweenHT andHB the column is forced laterally into the atmosphere to form an upper umbrella region. Within the eruption column, the vertical and horizontal velocity fields can be calculated from exprimental and theoretical studies and consideration of mass continuity. The centreline vertical velocity falls as a nearly linear function over most of the column's height and the velocity decreases as a gaussian function radially away from the centreline. Both column height and vertical velocity are strong functions of magma discharge rate. From calculations of the velocity field and the terminal fall velocity of clasts, a series of particle support envelopes has been constructed which represents positions where the column vertical velocity and terminal velocity are equal for a clast of specific size and density. The maximum range of a clast is determined in the absence of wind by the maximum width of the clast support envelope.

The trajectories of clasts leaving their relevant support envelope at its maximum width have been modelled in columns from 6 to 43 km high with no wind and in a wind field. From these calculations the shapes and areas of maximum grain size contours of the air-fall deposit have been predicted. For the no wind case the theoretical isopleths show good agreement with the Fogo A plinian deposit in the Azores. A diagram has been constructed which plots, for a particular clast size, the maximum range normal to the dispersal axis against the downward range. From the diagram the column height (and hence magma discharge rate) and wind velocity can be determined. Historic plinian eruptions of Santa Maria (1902) and Mount St. Helens (1980) give maximum heights of 34 and 19 km respectively and maximum wind speeds at the tropopause of m/s and 30 m/s respectively. Both estimates are in good agreement with observations. The model has been applied to a number of other plinian deposits, including the ultraplinian phase of theA.D. 180 Taupo eruption in New Zealand which had an estimated column height of 51 km and wind velocity of 27 m/s.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen JRL (1982) Particle motions at low concentrations: grading in pyroclastic-fall deposits. In: Sedimentary Structures, their character and physical basis, Vol 1 pp 111–134, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson T (1908) The volcanoes of Guatemala. Geogr J 31: 473–489Google Scholar
  3. Brazier S, Davies AN, Sigurdsson H, Sparks RSJ (1982) Fallout and deposition of volcanic ash during the 1979 explosive eruption of the Soufriere of St Vincent. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 14: 335–359Google Scholar
  4. Briggs GA (1969) Plume Rise. US Atomic Energy Commission, pp 1–80Google Scholar
  5. Carey S, Sigurdsson, H (1982) Influence of particle aggregation on deposition of distal tephra from the May 18th, 1980 eruption of Mount St Helens Volcano. J Geophys Res 87: 7061–7072Google Scholar
  6. Carey S, Sigurdsson H (1985) The May 18th, 1980 eruption of Mt St Helens, 2, Modelling of Dynamics of the plinian phase. J Geophys Res 90: 2948–2958Google Scholar
  7. Carey S, Sigurdsson H (1986) The 1982 eruptions of El Chichon Volcano, Mexico (2): Observations and numerical modelling of tephra-fall distribution. Bull Volcanol 48: 127–141Google Scholar
  8. Danielsen E (1981) Trajectories of the Mount St Helens eruption plume. Science 211: 819–821Google Scholar
  9. Eaton GP (1963) Volcanic ash deposits as a guide to atmospheric circulation in the geologic past. J Geophys Res 68: 521–528Google Scholar
  10. Fay J, Escudier M, Hoult D (1970) A correlation of field observations of plume rise. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 20: 391–397Google Scholar
  11. Fedotov, SA (1985) Estimates of heat and pyroclast discharge by volcanic eruptions based upon the eruption cloud and steady plume observations. Geodynamics 3: 275–302Google Scholar
  12. Harris DM, Rose WI, Roe R, Thompson MR (1981) Radar observations of ash eruptions. USGS Prof Pap 1250: 323–334Google Scholar
  13. Hoult D, Fay J, Forney L (1969) A theory of plume rise compared with field observations. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 19: 585–590Google Scholar
  14. Hoult D, Weil J (1972) Turbulent plume in a laminar cross-flow. Atmos Environ 6: 513–531Google Scholar
  15. Knox JB, Short NM (1964) A diagnostic model using ash fall data to determine eruption characteristics and atmospheric conditions during a major volcanic event. Bull Volcanol 27: 5–24Google Scholar
  16. Morton B, Taylor GI, Turner IS (1956) Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc Roy Soc A234: 1–23Google Scholar
  17. Rice CJ (1981) Electro-optical instrumentation for resources evaluation. Proc Intern Soc Optical Engineering 278: 23–31Google Scholar
  18. Rouse H, Yih CS, Humphreys HW (1952) Gravitational convection from a boundary source. Tellus: 201–210Google Scholar
  19. Scorer RS (1959) The behaviour of chimney plumes. Int J Air Pollut 1: 198–220Google Scholar
  20. Settle M (1978) Volcanic eruption clouds and the thermal power output of explosive eruptions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 3: 309–324Google Scholar
  21. Shaw DM, Watkins ND, Huang TC (1974) Atmospherically transported volcanic glass in deep sea sediments: theoretical considerations. J Geophys Res 79: 3087–3094Google Scholar
  22. Sigurdsson H, Sparks RSJ (1978) Rifting episodes in north Iceland in 1874–75 and the eruption of Askja and Sveinagja. Bull Volcanol 41: 1–19Google Scholar
  23. Slaughter M, Hamil M (1970) Model for deposition of volcanic ash and resulting bentonite. Geol Soc Am Bull 81: 961–968Google Scholar
  24. Sparks RSJ (1986) The dimensions and dynamics of volcanic eruption columns. Bull Volcanol 48: 3–15Google Scholar
  25. Sparks RSJ, Moore JG, Rice CJ (1986) The initial giant umbrella cloud of the May 18th, 1980, explosive eruption of Mount St Helens. J Volcanol Geothermal Res (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Sparks RSJ, Wilson L (1982) Explosive Volcanic Eruptions — V. Observations of plume dynamics during the 1979 Soufriere eruption, St Vincent. Geophys J R Astr Soc 69, 551–570Google Scholar
  27. Sparks RSJ, Wilson L, Sigurdsson H (1981) The pyroclastic deposits of the 1875 eruption of Askja. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 299: 241–273Google Scholar
  28. Suzuki T (1983) A theoretical model for dispersion of tephra. In: D Shimonguru, Yokoyama I (eds) Arc Volcanism: Physics and Tectonics, pp 95–116Google Scholar
  29. Suzuki T, Katsui Y, Nakamura T (1973) Size distribution of the Tarumai Ta–Tb pumice fall deposit. Bull Volcanol Soc Japan 18: 47–63Google Scholar
  30. Thorarinsson S (1963) Askja on Fire. Almenna Bokafelgid, Reykjavik, IcelandGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner JS (1979) Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press pp 1–368Google Scholar
  32. Waitt RB, Dzurisin D (1981) Proximal air-fall deposits from the May 18 eruption: stratigraphy and field sedimentology. USGS Prof Pap 1250: 601–616Google Scholar
  33. Walker GPL (1973) Explosive volcanic eruptions — a new classification scheme. Geol Rudsch 62: 431–446Google Scholar
  34. Walker GPL (1980) The Taupo pumice: product of the most powerful known (ultraplinian) eruption! J Volcanol Geotherm Res 8: 69–94Google Scholar
  35. Walker GPL (1981) Plinian eruptions and their products. Bull Volcanol 44: 223–240Google Scholar
  36. Walker GPL, Croasdale R (1971) Two plinian-type eruptions in the Azores. J Geol Soc London 127: 17–55Google Scholar
  37. Walker GPL, Self S, Wilson L (1984) Tarawera 1886, New Zealand — a basaltic plinian fissure eruption. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 21: 61–78Google Scholar
  38. Walker GPL, Wilson L, Bowell ELG (1971) Explosive Volcanic Eruptions—I: Rate of fall of pyroclasts. Geophys J R Astr Soc 22: 377–383Google Scholar
  39. Williams SN, Self S (1983) The October 1902 plinian eruptions of Santa Maria Volcano, Guatemala. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 16: 33–56Google Scholar
  40. Wilson L (1972) Explosive Volcanic Eruptions — II. The atmospheric trajectories of pyroclasts. Geophys J R Astr Soc 30: 381–392Google Scholar
  41. Wilson L (1976) Explosive Volcanic Eruptions — III. Plinian eruption columns. Geophys J R Astr Soc 45: 543–556Google Scholar
  42. Wilson L (1980) Relationships between pressure, volatile content and ejecta velocity in three types of volcanic explosion. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 8: 297–313Google Scholar
  43. Wilson L, Huang TC (1979) The influence of shape on the atmospheric settling velocity of volcanic ash particles. EPSL 44: 311–324Google Scholar
  44. Wilson L, Sparks RSJ, Huang TC, Watkins ND (1978) The control of volcanic column heights by eruption energetics and dynamics. J Geophys Res 83: 1829–1836Google Scholar
  45. Wilson L, Sparks RSJ, Walker GPL (1980) Explosive Volcanic Eruptions IV. The control of magma properties and conduit geometry on eruption column behaviour. Geophys J R Astr Soc 63: 117–148Google Scholar
  46. Wright SJ (1977) Mean behaviour of buoyant jets in a cross-flow. J Hydraulics Div: ASCE 103: 499–513Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Carey
    • 1
  • R. S. J. Sparks
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of OceanographyUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations