Journal of gambling behavior

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 115–122 | Cite as

Risk-taking behavior in gamblers and non-gamblers during prolonged exposure

  • Robert Ladouceur
  • Marie Mayrand
  • Yves Tourigny


Most comparisons between personality traits of gamblers and non-gamblers have yielded no significant differences (Kusyszyn & Rutter, 1985). But from a behavioral standpoint, gamblers have consistently placed heavier monetary bets than non-gamblers. Furthermore, past researchers have clearly shown that the level of risk-taking behavior increased as a function of the number of trials (Ladouceur, Tourigny, & Mayrand, in press). The present research compared the level of risk-taking behavior of gamblers and non-gamblers during prolonged exposure to American roulette (four sessions of 50 trials each). Subjects of each group (N=8) were matched on sex, age and academic level. Risk behavior was operationally defined as 1. Total amount of money bet at each trial; 2. types of bets; and 3. monetary risk coefficient. The statistical analysis of the results showed that the monetary risk coefficient was greater for the gamblers than the non-gamblers. Furthermore, for the three dependent variables, risk level increased as a function of the number of sessions and of trials. The overall results confirmed that exposure to gambling activities increased the level of monetary risk-taking behavior in gamblers and non-gamblers.


Risk Behavior Personality Trait Prolonged Exposure Risk Level Gambling Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, G. & Brown, R. I. F. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation seeking and arousal.British Journal of Psychology, 75 401–410.Google Scholar
  2. Blascovich, J., Veach, T. L., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1973). Black jack and the risky shift.Sociometry, 36 42–45.Google Scholar
  3. Custer, R. L. (1982). An overview of compulsive gambling. In P. A. Carone, S. F. Yolles, & S. N. Keiffer (Eds.),Addictive Disorders Update. New York: Human Science Press.Google Scholar
  4. Frey, J. & Eadington, W. R. (1984).Gambling: Views From the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Kusyszyn, I. & Kallai, C. (1985). The gambling person: Healthy or sick? Paper presented at the Second National Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Nevada.Google Scholar
  6. Kusyszyn, I. & Rutter, R. (1985). Personality characteristics of heavy gamblers, light gamblers, non-gamblers, and lottery players.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 1 59–63.Google Scholar
  7. Ladouceur, R. & Mayrand, M. (1986). The level of involvement and the timing of betting in gambling. Paper submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. Ladouceur, R. & Mayrand, M. (in press). Caractéristiques psychologiques de la prise de risque monétaire des joueurs et des non joueurs à la roulette.International Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
  9. Ladouceur, R., Tourigny, M.; & Mayrand, M. (in press). Familiarity, group exposure, and risk-taking behavior in gambling.Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
  10. Leary, K. & Dickerson, M. (1985). Levels of arousal in high- and low-frequency gamblers.Behavior Research and Therapy, 23 635–640.Google Scholar
  11. Letarte, A., Ladouceur, R., & Mayrand, M. (1986). Primary and secondary illusory control and risk-taking in gambling (roulette).Psychological Reports, 58 299–302.Google Scholar
  12. Peck, C. P. (1986). A public mental health issue: Risk-taking behavior and compulsive gambling.American Psychologist, 41 461–465.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Ladouceur
    • 1
  • Marie Mayrand
    • 1
  • Yves Tourigny
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole de PsychologieUniversité LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations