Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 143–152 | Cite as

Forms of logic in faith development theory

  • Romney M. Moseley
Articles

Abstract

A fundamental characteristic of structural-developmental psychology is that development is governed by a logico-mathematical, hence scientific, principle of equilibrium. In this article I examine James Fowler's proposal for a metaphorical interpretation of logic in his theory of faith development. I intend to argue that a metaphorical understanding of logic radically shifts the theory of faith development away from Piagetian structuralism and towards dialectical psychology. A metaphorical reading of stages and their transformation raises serious questions about the attempt to define faith in terms of stages of individual psychological development. A secondary proposal to be considered is the relevance of metaphorical theology to faith development theory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fowler, James W. (1981).Stages of faith. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  2. Fowler, James W. (1986). “Faith and the structuring of meaning.” In C. Dykstra and S. Parks (Eds.),Faith development and Fowler, Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  3. Grant, David. (1984).God: The center of value. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University.Google Scholar
  4. Green, Garrett (1989).Imagining God. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Kohlberg, Lawrence & Power, F. Clark (1981). “Moral development, religious thinking and the question of a seventh stage.” In L. Kohlberg,Essays in Moral Development, vol. II, (pp. 212–319), San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Lindbeck, George (1984).The nature of doctrine: religion and theology in a postliberal age Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  7. Moseley, Romney M., Jarvis, D. & Fowler, J. W. (1986).Manual for faith development research. Atlanta: Center for Research in Faith and Moral Development, Candler School of Theology, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  8. Niebuhr, H. Richard (1960).Radical monotheism and western culture. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  9. Piaget, Jean (1921). “L'orientation de la philosophie religieuse en Suisse romande.”La Semaine Litteraire, p. 412. Cited by Fernando Vidal, “Jean Piaget And The Liberal Protestant Tradition” in M. G. Ash and W. R. Woodward (1987).Psychology in Twentieth Century Thought and Society (p. 284). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Piaget, Jean (1923). “La psychologie et les valuers religieuses.”Sainte Croix 1922, Lausanne: La Concorde.Google Scholar
  11. Piaget, Jean (1926).La representation du monde chez l'enfant. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  12. Power, F. Clark & Kohlberg, Lawrence (1980). “Religion, morality and ego development.” In J. W. Fowler & A. Vergote (Eds.)toward moral and religious maturity. Morristown, New Jersey: Silver Burdett.Google Scholar
  13. Power, F. Clark (1987). “Hard versus soft stages of faith and religious development. A Piagetian critique.” Paper delivered at an international symposium on Religious Development and Religious Education, Blauberen, Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
  14. Riegel, Klaus (1976).Dialectical psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1963).The meaning and end of religion. New York: Macmillan. Smith's interpretation of religion fits Lindbeck's “experiential-expressive” approach to religion by which the external features of religion are derived from inner experienceGoogle Scholar
  16. Streib-Weickum, Heinz (1989).Hermeneutics of metaphor, symbol and narrative in faith development theory. Ph.D. Dissertation, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  17. Wartofsky, Marx (1971). “From praxis to logos.” In T. Mischel (Ed.)Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 129–147). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Romney M. Moseley
    • 1
  1. 1.Trinity CollegeUniversity of Toronto CanadaCanada

Personalised recommendations