Advertisement

Fire Technology

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 198–204 | Cite as

Aging impairs the ability to detect gas odor

  • Joseph C. Stevens
  • William S. Cain
  • David E. Weinstein
  • John B. Pierce
Article

Abstract

Weakened smelling is common in age. Two studies here show that this phenomenon frequently reveals itself in inability to detect ethyl mercaptan, the warning agent most commonly added to propane (LP-gas). The first study compared 21 young (18–25 years) with 21 old (70–85 years) persons for (a) detection threshold (average ten times higher in the elderly), (b) suprathreshold odor strength (weaker for the elderly at all levels), and (c) ability to identify common odors (the elderly did worse). Seven of the 21 elderly failed to detect ethyl mercaptan at or above a concentration associated with the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable levels of propane. Three of these failed to detect the odorant at a concentration where accompanying propane could explode. In the second study 50 of 110 persons over 60 years failed to detect odor reliably in commercial odorized propane diluted to the Department of Transportation's safety standard (one–fifth the lower explosive limit). Six of 52 persons under 40 also failed. The elderly person would seem at high risk of LP-gas fire.

Key words

Smelling and aging gas odor detection ethyl mercaptan propane explosions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chalke, H.D. and Dewhurst, J.R., “Accidental Coal-Gas Poisoning: Loss of Sense of Smell as a Possible Contributory Factor with Old People,”British Medical Journal, Vol. 2, 1957, pp. 915–917.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cain, W.S. and Turk, A., “Smell of Danger: An Analysis of LP-Gas Odorization,”American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Vol. 46,1985, pp. 115–126.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murphy, C., “Taste and Smell in the Elderly,”Clinical Measurement of Taste and Smell, edited by H.L. Meiselman and R.S. Rivlin, Macmillan, New York, 1986, pp. 343–375.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goetzinger, J. W., Brinkman, D. W., Poling, B. E., and Whisman, M. C., “Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium Data of Ethanethiol and Tetrahydrothiophene in Propane,”Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 22, 1977, pp. 396–399.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dravnieks, A. and Prokop, W.K., “Source Emission Odor Measurement by a Dynamic Force-Choice Triangle Olfactometer,”Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 25, 1975, pp. 28–35.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cain, W.S., Gent, J.G., Catalanotto, F.A., and Goodspeed, R.B., “Clinical Evaluation of Olfaction,”American Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol. 4, 1983, pp. 252–256.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whisman, M.L., Goetzinger, J.W., Cotton, F.O., and Brinkman, D.W., “Odorant Evaluation: A Study of Ethanethiol and Tetrahydrothiophene as Warning Agents in Propane,”Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 12, 1978, pp. 1285–1288.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stevens, S.S.,Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Aspects, Wiley, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevens, J.C. and Marks, L.E., “Cross-Modality Matching Functions Generated by Magnitude Estimation,”Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 27, 1980, pp. 379–389.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartoshuk, L.M., Rifkin, B., Marks, L.E., and Bars, P., “Taste and Aging,”Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 41, 1986, pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy, C. and Withee, J., “Age and Biochemical Status Predict Preference for Casein Hydrolysate,”Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 42, 1987, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stevens. J.C., Plantinga, A., and Cain, W.S., “Reduction of Odor and Nasal Pungency Associated with Aging,”Neurobiology of Aging, Vol. 3, 1982, pp. 125–132.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stevens, J.C., Bartoshuk, L.M., and Cain, W.S., “Chemical Senses and Aging: Taste versus Smell,”Chemical Senses, Vol. 9, 1984, pp. 167–179.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stevens, J.C. and Cain, W.S., “Age-related Deficiency in the Perceived Strength of Six Odorants,”Chemical Senses, Vol. 10, 1985, pp. 517–529.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schemper, T., Voss, S., and Cain, W.S., “Odor Identification in Young and Elderly Persons: Sensory and Cognitive Limitations,”Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 36, 1981, pp. 446–452.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dotv, R.L., Shaman, P., Applebaum, S.L., Giberson, R., Siksorski, L., and Rosenberg, L., “Smell Identification Ability: Changes with Age,”Science, Vol. 226, 1984, pp. 1441–1443.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cain, W.S., “Odor Identification by Males and Females: Predictions vs. Performance,”Chemical Senses, Vol. 7, 1982, pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Data Furnished by the United States Fire Administration, Emmitsburg, MD 21727.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moschandreas, D.J., Jones, D.R., Alpeter, L.L., “Factors which can Reduce the Olfactory Response to Natural Gas Odorants,” Presented at the 1983 International Gas Research Conference, London, June, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Fire Protection Association 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph C. Stevens
    • 1
  • William S. Cain
    • 1
  • David E. Weinstein
    • 1
  • John B. Pierce
    • 1
  1. 1.Foundation LaboratoryYale UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations