Transition Metal Chemistry

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 83–86 | Cite as

Binuclear oxofluorocomplexes of molybdenum(V)

  • Mukul C. Chakravorti
  • Anil K. Bera
Full Papers


The magnetic susceptibility of MoO(OH)3 or [MoOF5]2− in HF has been measured as a function of acid concentration. In very dilute acid the solutions are diamagnetic. The anionic complexes K4[Mo2O4F6] · 2H2O, K3[Mo2O4F5], Cs4[Mo2O4F6], Cs2[Mo2O4F4], (bipyH)2[Mo2O4F4] and (phenH)2[Mo2O4F4] were prepared by adding fluoride to solutions of MoO(OH)3 in dilute HF. The bipyridyl and phenanthroline compounds are converted to the nonelectrolytes [Mo2O4(bipy)2F2] and [Mo2O4(phen)2F2], respectively, on digesting with water or heating. These complexes are also obtained by adding the respective diimines to solutions of K2[MoOF5]. All the complexes are very weakly paramagnetic. The i.r. and the electronic spectra of the compounds show the characteristic features of complexes containing the Mo2O 4 +2 moiety.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    M. C. Chakravorti and S. C. Pandit,J. Coord. Chem.5, 85 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    D. Grandjean and R. Weiss,C. R. Senac. Acad. Sci. Paris, 263 C, 58 (1966).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    D. Grandjean and R. Weiss,Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 3040 (1967); 3050 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    R. Kergoat and J. E. Guerchais,Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1746 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    R. Mattes and G. Lux,Angew. Chem., 86, 598 (1974).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    R. Mattes, K. Mennemann, H. Rieskamp and H. Brockmeyer,J. Less Common Metals, 76, 199 (1980).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    W. G. Palmer,Experimental Inorganic Chemistry, The University Press, Cambridge (1954), p. 406.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    M. C. Chakravorti and S. C. Pandit,Inorg. Synth., 21, (in press).Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    A. I. Vogel,A Text Book of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, The English Language Book Society and Longman (1978), p. 472.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    M. C. Chakravorti and S. C. Pandit,J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 36, 2265 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    M. C. Chakravorti and S. C. Pandit,J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 35, 3644 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    J. Lewis and R. G. Wilkins,Modern Coordination Chemistry, Interscience Publishers Inc., New York (1960), p. 403.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Reactions in more dilute HF medium did not give any pure compound.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    L. Sacconi and R. Cini,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 4239 (1954).Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    E. I. Stiefel,Progress in Inorganic Chemistry, Ed. S. P. Lippard, Interscience, vol. 22 (1977), p. 85.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    R. J. H. Clark,J. Chem. Soc., 1377 (1963).Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    N. Vutelic and C. Djordjevic,J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1137 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Ref. No. 15, p. 83.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    I. W. Boyd, I. G. Dance, A. E. Landers and A. G. Wedd,Inorg. Chem., 18, 1875 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag Chemie GmbH 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mukul C. Chakravorti
    • 1
  • Anil K. Bera
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpur 721302, West BengalIndia

Personalised recommendations