Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 499–521 | Cite as

A comparison of turbulence measurements by different instruments; Tsimlyansk field experiment 1970

  • L. R. Tsvang
  • B. M. Koprov
  • S. L. Zubkovskii
  • A. J. Dyer
  • B. Hicks
  • M. Miyake
  • R. W. Stewart
  • J. W. McDonald
Article

Abstract

In the summer of 1970 an international intercomparison of turbulence measurement sensors was carried out at the Tsimlyansk field station of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IFA) Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. Improved sonic anemometer sensors of the IFA were compared with the Kaijo sonic used by the Canadian group and with the fluxatron from CSIRO, Australia.

Results from the experiment indicate that spectral and cospectral shapes are basically similar between the sonic anemometers. The spectra and cospectra of the fluxatron in the high-frequency region showed an attenuation which can be explained in terms of the response characteristics of the fluxatron. The maintenance of absolute calibration of the sensors in the field was found to be difficult, but when properly corrected for this variation, the measurements were found to agree within 13%, with a standard error of 0.2. A single point observation of turbulent fluxes at a few meters above the surface and averaged over a period of the order of one hour was shown to be representative of turbulent fluxes at the site.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bovsheverov, V. M. and Voronov, V. P.: 1960, ‘An Acoustic Wind Vane’,Izv., Acad. Nauk, U.S.S.R., Geophys. Ser., No. 6.Google Scholar
  2. Businger, J. A., Miyake, M., Dyer, A. J., and Bradley, E. F.: 1967, ‘On the Direct Determination of the Turbulent Heat Flux Near the Ground’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 1025–1032.Google Scholar
  3. Businger, J. A., Miyake, M., Inoue, E., Mitsuta, Y., and Hanafusa, T.: 1969, ‘Sonic Anemometer Comparisonand Measurements in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’,J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan. 47, 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. Dyer, A. J. and Maher, F. J.: 1965, ‘Automatic Eddy-Flux Measurement with the Evapotron’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 4, 622–625.Google Scholar
  5. Dyer, A. J., Hicks, B. B., and King, K. M.: 1967, ‘The Fluxatron - A Revised Approach to the Measurement of Eddy Fluxes in the Lower Atmosphere’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 408–413.Google Scholar
  6. Kaimal, J. C., and Businger, J. A.: 1963, ‘A Continuous Wave Sonic Anemometer-Thermometer’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 2, 156–164.Google Scholar
  7. Mitsuta, Y.: 1966, ‘Sonic Anemometer-Thermometer for General Use’,J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan. 44, 12–23.Google Scholar
  8. Miyake, M., Stewart, R. W., Burling, R. W., Tsvang, L. R., Koprov, B. M., and Kuznetsov, O. M.: 1971, ‘A Comparison of Acoustic Instruments in the Measure of Atmospheric Turbulent Flow Over Water’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 2, 228–245.Google Scholar
  9. Tsvang, L. R.: 1960, Measurements of Frequency Spectra of Temperature Fluctuations in an Atmospheric Layer Near the Ground,Izv., Acad. Nauk, U.S.S.R., Geophys. Ser. 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. R. Tsvang
    • 1
  • B. M. Koprov
    • 1
  • S. L. Zubkovskii
    • 1
  • A. J. Dyer
    • 2
  • B. Hicks
    • 2
  • M. Miyake
    • 3
  • R. W. Stewart
    • 3
  • J. W. McDonald
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R.MoscowU.S.S.R.
  2. 2.Division of Meteorological PhysicsCSIROAspendaleAustralia
  3. 3.Institute of Oceanography, University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations