Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 619–628 | Cite as

Structure of the quasihyperbolic stochasticity in an inertial self-excited oscillator

  • V. S. Anishchenko
  • V. V. Astakhov
  • T. E. Letchford
  • M. A. Safonova
Article

Conclusions

The foregoing investigations of the dynamics of the system (1), the results of which are largely similar to those obtained in our numerical analysis of Rössler's system [13] and to many other published data [1, 3–5, 11, 14, 15], indicate that quasihyperbolic attractors with a small fractional dimension in the domain above the critical state are typified by soft and hard bifurcations of the periodic trajectories. A bifurcation generating a stable two-dimensional torus from a cycle in nonautonomous three-dimensional systems in which the degree of contraction of the phase volume depends on the coordinates is clearly not realized [15], and for this effect to exist it is necessary to increase the dimension of the phase space to N=4 by introducing, for example, an external control signal. An analysis of systems with a forward Andronov-Hopf bifurcation shows that the typical mechanism of the evolution of stochasticity here is the mechanism of Feigenbaum doublings, against the background of which the mixing properties of hard bifurcations occur in the supercritical zone.

Keywords

Phase Space Fractional Dimension Critical State Control Signal Phase Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    J. P. Eckman, Rev. Mod. Phys.,53, Part I, No. 4, 643 (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Ruelle and F. Takens, in: Strange Attractors [Russian translation], Ya. G. Sinai and L. P. Shil'nikov (eds.), Mir, Moscow (1981), p. 117.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Manneville and Y. Pomeau, Physica D,1, 219 (1980).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. M. Izrailev, M. I. Rabinovich, and A. D. Ugodnikov, Phys. Lett. A,86, Nos. 6–7, 321 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. S. Anishchenko, V. V. Astakhov, and T. E. Letchford, Radiotekh. Elektron.,27, No. 10, 1972 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. S. Anishchenko, V. V. Astakhov, and T. E. Letchford, Zh. Tekh. Fiz.,53, No. 1, 152 (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. I. Khibnik, Periodic Solutions of Systems of Differential Equations: FORTRAN Algorithms and Programs [in Russian], No. 5, ONTI, Nauchn. Tsentr Biol. Issled., Pushchino (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. I. Arnol'd, Additional Chapters to the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Poston and I. Stewart, Catastrophe Theory and Its Applications, Pitman Publ., Marshfield, MA (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Gaizel, J. Nierwetberg, and J. Keller, Phys. Lett. A,86, No. 2, 75 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. S. Anishchenko, V. V. Astakhov, T. E. Letchford, and M. A. Safonova, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Radiofiz.,26, No. 2, 169 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. S. Anishchenko, Abstr. Third All-Union Conf. Fluctuation Phenomena in Physical Systems [in Russian], Vilnius (1982), p. 17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. E. Rössler, Phys. Lett. A,57, No. 5, 397 (1976).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. H. G. Helleman, Fundamental Problems of Statistical Mechanics 5, Proc. Fifth Int. Summer School, Enschede, June 23–July 5, 1980, Amsterdam (1980), p. 165.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Ott, Rev. Mod. Phys.,53, Part I, No. 4, 655 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. S. Anishchenko
  • V. V. Astakhov
  • T. E. Letchford
  • M. A. Safonova

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations