Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 321–345 | Cite as

A prospective study of the relationship between phonological, semantic and syntactic skills and specific reading disability

  • Gail Gillon
  • Barbara J. Dodd
Article

Abstract

Although it is well established that a relationship exists between specific reading disability and spoken language difficulties, the nature of that relationship remains controversial. In the study reported here, the performance of poor readers was firstly compared with that of matched good readers on a series of spoken and written language tasks on three assessment trials 12 months apart, and secondly to that of younger average readers. Five experimental tasks were used to measure the readers' phonological processing skills, and three subtests from the CELF-R were selected to measure the students' syntactic and semantic skills. Reading accuracy and comprehension ability were assessed by the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised. The results showed that 8–10-year-old poor readers performed poorly in all three linguistic areas concurrently, and that these difficulties persisted. However, the important finding from this study was that while the good readers demonstrated no significant difference between their phonological processing skills and their semantic/syntactic skills, the poor readers' ability did differ according to skill area. The poor readers' phonological processing skills appeared to be particularly impaired, a finding which was further enhanced by results from the reading-match comparison. The results are discussed in terms of current theories of reading disability.

Key words

Phonology Semantics Specific reading disability Spoken language skills Syntax 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron P., Olsen J. & Baker C. (1985). The dyslexic college student: Is he also dysphasic?,Cognitive Neuropsychology 2: 115–117.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop D. (1991). Developmental reading disabilities: The role of phonological processing has been over emphasised,Mind and Language 6: 97–101.Google Scholar
  3. Bowey J. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skills and on-going reading comprehension monitoring,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 282–299.Google Scholar
  4. Brown L., Sherbenou R. & Johnsen S. (1990).Test of nonverbal intelligence: A language-free measure of cognitive ability, 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell R. (1991). The importance of special cases: or how the deaf might be, but are not, phonological dyslexics,Mind and Language 6: 107–112.Google Scholar
  6. Catts H. (1991). Facilitating phonological awareness: role of speech-language pathologist,Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 22: 196–203.Google Scholar
  7. Clay M. (1991).Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland: Heinemann Education.Google Scholar
  8. Coltheart M. (1991). Phonological abilities and reading disabilities,Mind and Language 6: 93–96.Google Scholar
  9. de Gelder B. & Vroomen J. (1991). Phonological deficits: a source of asymmetries between developmental and acquired dyslexia,Mind and Language 6: 125–129.Google Scholar
  10. Denckla M. & Rudel R. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities,Neuropsychologia 14: 471–478.Google Scholar
  11. Dodd B., Sprainger N. & Oerlemans M. (1989). The phonological skills of spelling disordered children,Reading and Writing 1: 333–355.Google Scholar
  12. Dundas V. & Strong G. (1989).Readers writers and parents learning together. Brisbane: Stroodum Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Dunn L. & Dunn L. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Minnesota: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis N. & Large B. (1987). The development of reading: as you seek so shall you find,British Journal of Psychology 78: 1–28Google Scholar
  15. Feller W. (1968).An introduction to probability theory and its application. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Finucci J. (1986). Follow up studies of developmental dyslexia and other learning disabilities. In S. D. Smith (ed.),Genetics and learning disabilities (pp. 97–120). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Hall W., White T. & Guthrie L. (1986). Skilled reading in language development: Some key issues. In J. Orasanu (ed.),Reading comprehension from research to practice (pp. 89–111). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Huberty C. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis,Psychological Bulletin 95: 156–171.Google Scholar
  19. Hulme C. & Snowling M. (1991). Deficits in output phonology cause developmental phonological dyslexia,Mind and Language 6: 130–134.Google Scholar
  20. Katz R. (1986). Phonological deficiencies in children with reading disability: Evidence from an object naming task,Cognition 22: 225–257.Google Scholar
  21. Kamhi A. (1992). Response to historical perspective: A developmental language perspective,Journal of Learning Disabilities 25: 48–52.Google Scholar
  22. Lenchner O., Gerber M. & Routh D. (1990). Phonological awareness tasks as predictors of decoding ability: Beyond segmentation,Journal of Learning Disabilities 23: 240–246.Google Scholar
  23. Lundberg I., Olofsson A. & Wall S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten,Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21: 159–173.Google Scholar
  24. Manis F., Szeszulski P., Holt L. & Graves K. (1990). Variation in component word recognition and spelling skills among dyslexic children and normal readers. In T. Carr & B. Levy (eds.),Reading and its development (pp. 207–259). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mann V., Cowin E. & Schoenheimer J. (1989). Phonological processing, language comprehension and reading ability,Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 76–89.Google Scholar
  26. Mann V. & Ditunno P. (1990). Phonological deficiencies: Effective predictors of future reading problems,Perspectives on Dyslexia 2: 131–105.Google Scholar
  27. Mann V., Shankweiler D. & Smith S. (1984). The association between comprehension of spoken sentences and early reading ability: the role of phonetic representation,Journal of Child Language 12: 627–643.Google Scholar
  28. Neale M. (1988).Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Newcomer P. & Magee P. (1977). The performance of learning (reading) disabled children on a test of spoken language,The Reading Teacher 30: 896–900.Google Scholar
  30. Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Perin D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling,British Journal of Psychology 74: 9–44.Google Scholar
  32. Rabinovitch, R. (1959). Reading and learning disabilities. In S. Arieti (ed.),American handbook of psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Rack J., Snowling M. & Olsen R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review,Reading Research Quarterly 27: 29–53.Google Scholar
  34. Roth F. & Spekman N. (1989). The oral syntactic proficiency of learning disabled students: a spontaneous story sampling analysis,Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 67–77.Google Scholar
  35. Scarborough H. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children,Child Development 61: 1728–1743.Google Scholar
  36. Shankweiler D., Crain S., Brady S. & Macaruso P. (1992). Identifying the causes of reading disability. In P. Gough, L. Ehr & R. Treiman (eds.),Reading acquisition (pp. 275–305), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Semel E., Wiig E. & Secord W. (1987).Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals — Revised. Examiners Manual. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  38. Stanovich K. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency,Reading Research Quarterly 16: 32–71.Google Scholar
  39. Stanovich K. (1985). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?,Annals of Dyslexia 35: 67–69.Google Scholar
  40. Vellutino, F. (1977). Alternative conceptualizations of dyslexia: Evidence in support of a verbal deficit hypothesis,Harvard Educational Review 47: 334–353.Google Scholar
  41. Vellutino F. & Scanlon M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study,Merrill Palmer Quarterly 33: 321–365.Google Scholar
  42. Vogel S. (1974). Syntactic abilities in normal and dyslexic children,Journal of Learning Disabilities 7: 103–109.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner R. & Torgesen J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212.Google Scholar
  44. Wiig E. & Semel M. (1984).Language assessment and intervention for the learning disabled, 2nd ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  45. Wilkinson L. (1987)SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: Systat.Google Scholar
  46. Zubrick A. (1991) Oral language development in the school years,Australian Journal of Reading 14: 317–325.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gail Gillon
    • 1
  • Barbara J. Dodd
    • 2
  1. 1.Brisbane Catholic Education CentreDutton ParkAustralia
  2. 2.Speech and Hearing DepartmentThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations