Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 82, Issue 1–4, pp 243–258 | Cite as

Survey of experimental results on μCF including hyperfine effects

  • P. Ackerbauer
  • W. H. Breunlich
  • M. Fuchs
  • S. Fussy
  • M. Jeitler
  • P. Kammel
  • B. Lauss
  • J. Marton
  • W. Prymas
  • J. Werner
  • J. Zmeskal
  • K. Lou
  • C. Petitjean
  • P. Baumann
  • H. Daniel
  • F. J. Hartmann
  • W. Schott
  • T. von Egidy
  • P. Wojciechowski
  • D. Chatellard
  • J. P. Egger
  • E. Jeannet
  • T. Case
  • K. M. Crowe
  • R. H. Sherman
  • V. Markushin
Experimental Phenomenology Of pd, pt, dd, And tt Fusion Branches

Abstract

Complementary to the investigations of the most efficient dt cycle, also the other muon-induced fusion cycles in mixtures of hydrogen isotopes have been studied. The results of these dedicated experiments provide rich information about muon-induced few-body reactions and contribute significantly to a better overall understanding of μCF. A summary of the recent progress will be presented. Special emphasis will be put on two characteristic examples, namely a new experimental approach to study the muonic cascade in H-D mixtures and the systematic study of hyperfine effects in muon-induced reactions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    W.H. Breunlich, P. Kammel, J.S. Cohen and M. Leon, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 39 (1989) 311; L.I. Ponomarev, Contemp. Phys. 31 (1991) 219.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L.I. Menshikov and L.I. Ponomarev, JETP Lett. 39 (1984) 662.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Chaplinski et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 55.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    As usual, all rates are normalized to the densityN=4.25×1022 atoms/cm3 of liquid H2, and densities φ are given relative to this value.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Ackerbauer et al., Proceedings of this Conference, Hyp. Int. 82 (1993) 357.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. Kammel, Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 111.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Ackerbauer et al., PSI-proposal, addendum, R-81-05.2 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Leon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1971) 413.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Ackerbauer et al., PSI Nucl. Part. Phys. Newsletter (1991) 53; Verhandl. DPG (VI) 27, C1.4 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Fiorucci et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A292 (1990) 141; J.P. Egger et al.,Proc. Workshop on Muonic Atoms and Molecules, Ascona, 1992, eds. C. Petitjean and L.A. Schaller (Birkhäuser, Basel) p. 331.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Kammel,Proc. Workshop on Muonic Atoms and Molecules, Ascona, 1992, eds. C. Petitjean and L.A. Schaller (Birkhäuser, Basel) p. 111.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    see P. Weber et al., Phys. Rev. A41 (1990), 1, and references therein.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    E. Zavattini, in:Muon Physics, eds. C.S. Wu and V.W. Hughes (Academic, New York, 1975) Vol. II, p.219; this review contains also a comprehensive discussion of discussion of hyperfine effects in nuclear muon capture in ppμ molecules.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Cargnelli, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, (1986), unpublished; M. Cargnelli et al., in:Proc. 23rd Yamada Conference on Nuclear Weak Processes and Nuclear Structure, Osaka, 1989, eds. M. Morita, E. Ejiri, H. Ohtsubo and T. Sata (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) p.115.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Doi et al., Nucl. Phys. A511 (1990) 507.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Bardin et al., Nucl. Phys. A453 (1986) 591.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R.T. Siegel et al.,Proc. Workshop on Muonic Atoms and Molecules, Ascona, 1992, eds. C. Petitjean and L.A. Schaller (Birkhäuser, Basel) p. 243. J.B. Kraiman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1942.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    D.D. Bakalov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 48 (1988) 210.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    G. Aissing et al., Phys. Rev. A42 (1990) 116; Phys. Rev. A42 (1990) 3789.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Bracci et al., Phys. Lett. A134 (1989) 453.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Kammel et al., Phys. Lett. B112 (1982) 319; Phys. Rev. A28 (1983) 2611.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    S.E. Gershtein, Sov. Phys. JETP 13 (1961) 488.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    L.I. Men'shikov et al., Sov. Phys. JETP 65 (1987) 656; M.P. Faifman et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 4 (1989) 1.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. Zmeskal et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 1 (1987) 109; Phys. Rev. A42 (1990) 1165; W.H. Breunlich, Nucl. Phys. A508 (1990) 3c; A. Scrinzi et al., Phys. Rev. A47 (1993) 4691.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M.P. Faifman, Muon Catal. Fusion 4 (1989) 341.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. Leon, Phys. Rev. A33 (1986) 4434.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    N. Nägele et al., Nucl. Phys. A439 (1989) 397.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    S.A. Alexander and H.J. Monkhorst, Phys. Rev. A38 (1988) 26.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Including an estimated correction of 0.24 meV [1] for the finite molecular size, compare also A. Scrinzi and K. Szalewicz, Phys. Rev. A39 (1989) 4983.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    W.H. Breunlich et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 149.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    L.N. Bogdanova et al., Phys. Lett. B115 (1982) 171; B167 (1986) 485(E).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    G. Hale, Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 227.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    A. Adamczak and V.S. Melezhik, Muon Catal. Fusion 4 (1991) 303.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    D.V. Balin et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 163.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    V.M. Bystritsky et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 141.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    A. Bertin et al., Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 3774.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    W.H. Bertl et al., Atomkernenerg. Kerntech. 43 (1983) 184.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    J.L. Friar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1827.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    C. Petitjean et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 199.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    J. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A44 (1991) 2836.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    S.S. Gershtein and L.I. Ponomarev, in:Muon Physics, eds. C.S. Wu and V.W. Hughes (Academic, New York, 1975) Vol. III, p. 141.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    L.N. Bogdanova and V.E. Markushin, Muon Catal. Fusion 5 (1990) 189.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    F.J. Hartmann et al., Proceedings of this Conference, Hyp. Int. 82 (1993) 259; P. Baumann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3720.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    A. Adamczak et al., Phys. Lett. B285 (1992) 319.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    W.H. Breunlich et al., Muon Catal. Fusion 1 (1987) 121.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Reaction constants from ref. [31] and molecular overlap intergrals from refs. [31] and [47], respectively.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    S.A. Alexander et al., Phys. Rev. A41 (1990) 2854; Phys. Rev. 43 (1991) 2585(E).Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    L.N. Bogdanova, Muon Catal. Fusion 3 (1988) 359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Ackerbauer
    • 1
  • W. H. Breunlich
    • 1
  • M. Fuchs
    • 1
  • S. Fussy
    • 1
  • M. Jeitler
    • 1
  • P. Kammel
    • 1
  • B. Lauss
    • 1
  • J. Marton
    • 1
  • W. Prymas
    • 1
  • J. Werner
    • 1
  • J. Zmeskal
    • 1
  • K. Lou
    • 2
  • C. Petitjean
    • 2
  • P. Baumann
    • 3
  • H. Daniel
    • 3
  • F. J. Hartmann
    • 3
  • W. Schott
    • 3
  • T. von Egidy
    • 3
  • P. Wojciechowski
    • 3
  • D. Chatellard
    • 4
  • J. P. Egger
    • 4
  • E. Jeannet
    • 4
  • T. Case
    • 5
  • K. M. Crowe
    • 5
  • R. H. Sherman
    • 6
  • V. Markushin
    • 7
  1. 1.Institut für Mittelenergiephysik, Österreichische Akademie der WissenschaftenViennaAustria
  2. 2.Paul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
  3. 3.Physik DepartmentTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  4. 4.Institute de Physique de l'UniversiteNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  5. 5.Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  6. 6.Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  7. 7.I.V. Kurchatov Institute of Atomic EnergyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations