Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 231–243 | Cite as

Orthographic and phonological coding during visual word matching as related to reading and spelling abilities in college students

  • Charles F. Levinthal
  • Michelle Hornung
Article

Abstract

College students, scoring average to above-average on WRAT-R subscales for reading and spelling, made match/nonmatch judgments on word pairs either on the basis of phonological similarity (a rhyme match) or orthographic similarity (a visual match). Word pairs rhymed and looked similar, rhymed but looked dissimilar, or looked similar but did not rhyme. Word pairs for which a nonmatch decision had to be made, despite similarity in the irrelevant dimension, produced significantly more errors and longer response latencies. Poorer readers were less vulnerable to phonological interference when making visual discriminations, and poorer readers and spellers were more vulnerable to orthographic interference when making rhyme matches. Results showed that a deficiency in phonological coding and an over-reliance upon orthographic coding, often observed in dyslexic children, can also be seen in relatively poor readers and spellers within a normal adult population.

Key words

Orthographic coding Phonological coding Phonological deficiency Reading Spelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beers, C. S. (1980). The relationship of cognitive development to spelling and reading abilities. In: E. H. Henderson and J. W. Beers (eds.),Development and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  2. Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 15: 663–687.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness.Nature 271: 746–747.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E. (1979). Independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 21: 504–514.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection.Nature 301: 419–421.Google Scholar
  6. Bruck, M. (1988). The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children.Reading Research Quarterly 23: 52–68.Google Scholar
  7. Bruck, M. and Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50: 156–178.Google Scholar
  8. Catts, H. W. (1989). Phonological processing deficits and reading disabilities. In: A. G. Kamhi and H. W. Catts (eds.),Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective. Boston: College-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Dodd, B., Sprainger, N. and Oerlemans, M. (1989). The phonological skills of spelling disordered children.Reading and Writing 1: 333–355.Google Scholar
  11. Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words.Journal of Reading Behavior 19: 5–31.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, N. (1981). Visual and naming coding in dyslexic children.Psychological Research 43: 201–218.Google Scholar
  13. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In: U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, J. W., Wilson, K. P., Humphreys, M. S., Tinzman, M. B. and Bowyer, P. M. (1983). Phonemic-similarity effects in good vs. poor readers.Memory and Cognition 11: 520–527.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, M. (1980). Further evidence for a relationship between memory access and reading ability.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 683–694.Google Scholar
  16. Jastak, S. and Wilkinson, G. S. (1984).The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised: Administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Johnston, R. S. (1982). Phonological coding in dyslexic readers.British Journal of Psychology 73: 455–460.Google Scholar
  18. Joshi, R. M. and Aaron, P. G. (1990). Specific spelling disability: Factual or artifactual?Reading and Writing 2: 107–125.Google Scholar
  19. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L. and Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade.Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 243–255.Google Scholar
  20. Kramer, A. and Donchin, E. (1987). Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13: 76–86.Google Scholar
  21. Kramer, A., Ross, W. and Donchin, E. (1982). Individual differences in human information processing: A chronometric analysis of the role of orthographic and phonological cues in a non-lexical decision task [Abstract].Psychophysiology 19: 330–331.Google Scholar
  22. Manis, F. R., Szeszulski, P. A., Holt, L. K. and Graves, K. (1988). A developmental perspective on dyslexic subtypes.Annals of Dyslexia 38: 139–153.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W. and Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Function of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory and Cognition 2: 309–321.Google Scholar
  24. Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J. and Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 339–348.Google Scholar
  25. O'Neill, P. M. (1990).Phonemic/orthographic skills and cognitive style as applied to spelling ability in elementary school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.Google Scholar
  26. Pennington, B. F., Lefly, D. L., Van Orden, G. C., Bookman, M. O. and Smith, S. D. (1987). Is phonology bypassed in normal and dyslexic development?Annals of Dyslexia 37: 62–89.Google Scholar
  27. Polich, J., McCarthy, G., Wang, W. S. and Donchin, E. (1983). When words collide: Orthographic and phonological interference during word processing.Biological Psychology 16: 155–180.Google Scholar
  28. Rack, J. P. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia.British Journal of Psychology 76: 325–340.Google Scholar
  29. Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review 96: 523–568.Google Scholar
  30. Seidenberg, M. S. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 546–554.Google Scholar
  31. Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A. and Fischer, F. W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 531–545.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel, L. S. and Linder, B. A. (1984). Short-term memory processes in children with reading and arithmetic learning disabilities.Developmental Psychology 20: 200–207.Google Scholar
  33. Snowling, M. J. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29: 219–238.Google Scholar
  34. Stanovich, K. E. (1987). Introduction.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33(3).Google Scholar
  35. Temple, C. M. (1990). Foop is still floop: A six year follow-up of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia.Reading and Writing 2: 209–211.Google Scholar
  36. Thorndike, E. L. (1932).A teacher's word book of the twenty thousand words found most frequently and widely in general reading for children and young people, rev. ed. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  37. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F. and Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.Psychological Review 97: 488–522.Google Scholar
  38. Zutell, J. and Rasinski, T. (1989). Reading and spelling connections in third and fifth grade students.Reading Psychology 10: 137–155.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles F. Levinthal
    • 1
  • Michelle Hornung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHofstra UniversityHempsteadUSA

Personalised recommendations