Fluorescence lifetime and rotational correlation time of bovine serum albumin-sodium dodecyl sulfate complex labeled with 1-dimethylaminonaphthalene-5-sulfonyl chloride: Effect of disulfide bridges in the protein on these fluorescence parameters
- 217 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
A fluorescent dye, 1-dimethylaminonaphthalene-5-sulfonyl chloride, was used to label bovine serum albumin (BSA), intact and disulfide bridges-cleaved. The fluorescence lifetime and fluorescence anisotropy of the adducts in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solutions were studied by the nanosecond fluorescence depolarization method. The volume of equivalent sphere (Ve) was calculated to be 2.1×10−19 cm3 for BSA with the intact disulfide bridges from the rotational correlation time. The value ofVe was 4.4×10−19 cm3 for the disulfide bridges-cleaved BSA. With an increase in SDS concentration, the rotational correlation time of the intact BSA became longer, while that of the disulfide bridges-cleaved BSA became shorter. This suggests that upon the binding of SDS, the total volume of the intact BSA increases while the expanded state of the protein, caused by the cleavage of the disulfide bridges, becomes compact.
Key words
Bovine serum albumin sodium dodecyl sulfate fluorescence lifetime fluorescence anisotropy protein conformationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Batra, P. P., Sasa, K., Ueki, T., and Takeda, K. (1989).Biochem. Int., in press.Google Scholar
- Belford, G. G., Belford, R. L., and Weber, G. (1972).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 1392–1393.Google Scholar
- Brewer, J. M., Bastiaens, P., and Lee, J. (1987).Biophysical Chem. 28, 77–88.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. R. (1977). InAlbumin Structure, Function, and Uses (Rosenoer, V. M., Oratz, M., and Rothschild, M. A., eds.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 27–51.Google Scholar
- Chen, R. F. (1968).Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 128, 163–175.Google Scholar
- Dayhoff, M. O., Perlmann, G. E., and MacInnes, D. A. (1952).J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 2515–2517.Google Scholar
- Era, S., Nagaoka, S., Sogami, M., Watari, H., and Akasaka, K. (1985).Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 26, 21–32.Google Scholar
- Hilak, M. C., Harmsen, B. J. M., Braam, W. G. M., Joordens, J. J. M., and Van Os, G. A. J. (1974).Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 6, 95–101.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. N. (1975). InBiological Interfaces, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 101–130.Google Scholar
- King, T. P. (1973).Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 156, 509–520.Google Scholar
- Kinosita, K., Jr., Ikegami, A., Yoshida, M., and Kagawa, Y. (1982).J. Biochem. 92, 2043–2046.Google Scholar
- Kuntz, I. D. (1971).J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 514–516.Google Scholar
- Lapanje, S. (1978). InPhysicochemical Aspects of Protein Denaturation, Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. 156–179.Google Scholar
- Moser, P., Squire, P. G., and O'Konski, C. T. (1966).J. Phys. Chem. 70, 744–756.Google Scholar
- Peters, T., Jr. (1975). InThe Plasma Proteins, Vol. 1 (Putnam, F. W., ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 133–181.Google Scholar
- Peters, T., Jr., and Feldhoff, R. C. (1975).Biochemistry 14, 3384–3391.Google Scholar
- Reed, R. G., Feldhoff, R. C., and Peters, T., Jr. (1976).Biochemistry 15, 5394–5398.Google Scholar
- Squire, P. G., Moser, P., and O'Konski, C. T. (1968).Biochemistry 7, 4261–4272.Google Scholar
- Steiner, R. F., and Norris, L. (1987).Biopolymers 26, 1189–1204.Google Scholar
- Steinhardt, J., and Reynolds, J. A. (1969). InMultiple Equilibria in Proteins, Academic Press, New York, pp. 239–302.Google Scholar
- Takeda, K., Miura, M., and Takagi, T. (1981).J. Colloid Interface Sci. 82, 38–44.Google Scholar
- Takeda, K., Shigeta, M., and Aoki, K. (1987).J. Colloid Interface Sci. 117, 120–126.Google Scholar
- Takeda, K., Sasa, K., Kawamoto, K., Wada, A., and Aoki, K. (1988).J. Colloid Interface Sci. 124, 284–289.Google Scholar
- Takeda, K., Wada, A., Nishimura, T., Ueki, T., and Aoki, K. (1989).J. Colloid Interface Sci. 133, 497–504.Google Scholar
- Vos, K., van Hoek, A., and Visser, A. J. W. G. (1987).Eur. J. Biochem. 165, 55–63.Google Scholar
- Yguerabide, J. (1972).Methods Enzymol. 26, 498–578.Google Scholar