Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 331–349 | Cite as

Sucker bet or sure thing: A critical analysis of sports lotteries

  • Garry J. Smith


A paradox currently exists regarding legal sports gambling in North America: various forms are flourishing in Nevada, Oregon, and several Canadian provinces, while at the same time the United States Congress is conducting hearings on two bills that would prohibit any new state-sponsored sports gambling initiatives. This study examines the issue of why some jurisdictions are enthusiastic about legal sports gambling while others strongly resist the concept. In reviewing these divergent viewpoints, a case study of the newfledged Canadian “Sport Select” gambling format is presented. This example is used to highly the perils and payoffs of a typical state-sponsored sports gambling scheme, with a view toward broadening our understanding of how they work and how they might be fairer to the public.


Critical Analysis Canadian Province Gambling Format Sport Lottery Sport Gambling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brams, M. (1977). The economics of the unsuccessful Delaware football lottery. Unpublished manuscript from the Department of Urban Affairs and the Public Policy, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, B. (1989). Going on tilt: Frequent poker players and control.Journal of Gambling Studies, 1, 3–21.Google Scholar
  3. Christiansen, E. (1990). U.S. gaming handle up only 6% in '89.International Gaming and Wagering Business, 11(7), 22–30.Google Scholar
  4. Clotfelter, C. & Cook, P. (1989).Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dombrink, J. & Thompson, W. (1990).The last resort: Success and failure in campaigns for casinos. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  6. Frey, J. (1985). Gambling, sports and public policy. In A. Johnson and J. Frey (Eds.).Government and sport: The public policy issues (189–218), Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
  7. Furst, T. (1972). Some factors and observations on the upsurge in gambling on spectator team sports. In T. Thornberry and E. Sagarin (Eds.),Images of crime: Offenders and victims (pp. 47–55), New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Kallick, M., Suits, D., Dielman, T. & Hybels, J. (1979).A survey of American gambling attitudes and behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute For Social Research.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, W. (1991). A Sure Bet To Lower Debt.Sports Illustrated. Sept. 2, page 144.Google Scholar
  10. Lapchick, R. & Stuckey, D. (1991). Legalized sports gambling represents “fools gold.”Center for the Study of Sport in Society Digest. Northeastern University,3(3), 2.Google Scholar
  11. Lesieur, H.R. (1992). Compulsive gambling.Society, 29, May/June, 43–50.Google Scholar
  12. Manteris, A. (1991).Super bookie: Inside Las Vegas sports gambling. Chicago: Contemporary Books.Google Scholar
  13. McIntosh, P. (1979).Fair play: Ethics in sport and education. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  14. Miller Brewing Company (1983).The Miller Lite report on American attitudes toward sports. Milwaukee: Miller Brewing Co.Google Scholar
  15. Orkin, M. (1991).Can you win? The real odds for casino gambling, sports belting, and lotteries. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Osborne, J. (1991). The evolution of public lotteries in British Columbia: The genesis of a modern lottery scandal. In W.R. Eadington and J.A. Cornelius (Eds.)Gambling and public policy: International perspectives (pp. 285–302). Reno: Institute for Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  17. Picard, A. (1991, Oct. 4). Hockey lotteries outrage officials.Toronto Globe and Mail, A. 14.Google Scholar
  18. Reilly, P. (1990). Pathological gambling prevalence in New Jersey 1990. Report prepared for New Jersey Department of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, P. (1991). Sports betting lotteries: Not perfect together.Casino Player. Sept. 38–46.Google Scholar
  20. Rose, I.N. (1991). The rise and fall of the third wave: Gambling will be outlawed in forty years. In W.R. Eadington and Judy A. Cornelius (Eds.),Gambling and public policy: International perspectives (pp. 65–86), Reno: Institute for the study of gambling and commercial gaming, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  21. Rosecrance, J. (1985).The degenerates of Lake Tahoe. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Rosecrance, J. (1987). Bookmaking: A case where honesty is the best policy.Sociology and Social Research, 72(1), 7–11.Google Scholar
  23. Roxborough, M. (1991a). A country wide overview: Will Nevada permit phone betting?International Gaming and Wagering Business, 12(9), 18.Google Scholar
  24. Roxborough, M. (1991b). Know thy customers: Who are they? What makes them tick?International Gaming and Wagering Business, 12(11), 56.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, G.J. (1987). Gambling and sport. The Canadian experience.Arena Review, 11(1), 25–36.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, G.J. (1990). Pools, parlays and pointspreads: A sociological consideration of the legalization of sports gambling.Sociology of Sport Journal, 7(3), 271–286.Google Scholar
  27. Windross, A. (1984). Introduction of legal betting on rugby league. In G. Caldwell, B. Haig, M. Dickerson, and L. Sylvan (Eds.),Gambling in Australia (pp. 276–281). Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garry J. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Physical Education and Sport StudiesUniversity of Alberta-EdmontonEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations