Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 1258–1268 | Cite as

Quark model of superconducting type and nondiagonal P-A transitions

  • M. K. Volkov
  • A. N. Ivanov
  • M. Nagy
  • N. I. Troitskaya
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Conclusions

We discuss the obtained results. We note that the solution to the problem of the elimination of the unphysical interactions that arise through the P-A diagnonalization has been obtained at the prescriptional level. We have found that to eliminate the unphysical vertices due to the P-A diagnonalization, it is sufficient to replace the effective Lagrangian (22) by the Pauli-Villars regularized Lagrangian (33). The regularization is needed because of the nonuniqueness of the calculation of the individual quark diagrams that describe the new interaction vertices. The Pauli-Villars regularization corresponds to subtraction from the quark diagram of a quantity determined by the same diagram but in which all the masses of the virtual quarks are replaced by the masses of the fermions — the regularizers M. Application of the regularization for the complete effective Lagrangian has the consequence that an appropriate contribution of the regularizers is subtracted from any vertex that arises as a result of shift of the axial fields (4). This is sufficient for the correct description of the interaction vertices that arise from the P-A diagonalization.

Keywords

Quark Model Correct Description Interaction Vertex Axial Field Prescriptional Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    S. Gasiorowicz and D. A. Geffen, Rev. Mod. Phys.,41, 531 (1969); M. K. Volkov and V. N. Pervushin, Essentially Nonlinear Quantum Theories, Dynamical Symmetries, and Meson Physics [in Russian], Atomizdat, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. K. Volkov, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),157, 282 (1984); Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra,17, 433 (1986); D. Ebert, A. N. Ivanov, and M. K. Volkov, Fortschr. Phys.,37, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev.,122, 345 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Bramon and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Lett. B,80, 239 (1979).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev.,177, 2426 (1969); J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento A,60, 47 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B,95, 95 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. N. Ivanov, Yad. Fiz.,33, 1679 (1981); A. N. Ivanov and N. I. Troitskaya, Yad. Fiz.,36, 220 (1982); A. A. Andrianov and Yu. V. Novozhilov, Phys. Lett. B,153, 422 (1985).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Kramer, W. Palmer, and S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. D,30, 89 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Ebert, A. N. Ivanov, H. Reinhardt, and M. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B,182, 193 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. K. Volkov andA. N. Ivanov, Teor. Mat. Fiz.,69, 156 (1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. L. Adler, B. W. Lee, and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. D,4, 3497 (1971); M. V. Terent'ev, Phys. Lett. B,38, 419 (1972); R. Aviv and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D,5, 2372 (1972).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu. M. Antipov et al., Phys. Rev. D,36, 36 (1987).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. N. Ivanov, M. Nagy, and M. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B,200, 171 (1988).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. N. Ivanov, N. I. Troitskaya, and A. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B,175, 467 (1987);184, 94 (1987); M. K. Volkov and A. N. Ivanov, Yad. Fiz.,44, 1272 (1986); M. K. Volkov, A. N. Ivanov, and N. I. Troitskaya, Yad. Fiz.,47, 1157 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Monahar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B,160, 57 (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Bardeen, L. M. Cooper, and I. R. Schriffer, Phys. Rev.,106, 162 (1957); N. N. Bogolyubov, V. V. Tolmachev, and D. V. Shirkov, A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, New York (1959).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. N. Ivanov and V. M. Shekhter, Yad. Fiz.,31, 530 (1980); E. D'Hoker and E. Farhi, Nucl. Phys. B,248, 59, 77 (1984).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Gross, R. Jackiw, and S. Treiman, Lectures on Current Algebra [Russian translation] Atomizdat, Moscow (1977), Lecture 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Volkov
    • 1
  • A. N. Ivanov
    • 2
  • M. Nagy
    • 3
  • N. I. Troitskaya
    • 2
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaUSSR
  2. 2.Leningrad Polytechnic InstituteLeningradUSSR
  3. 3.Institute of Physics, TsÉFISlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations