Quark model of superconducting type and nondiagonal P-A transitions
- 39 Downloads
Conclusions
We discuss the obtained results. We note that the solution to the problem of the elimination of the unphysical interactions that arise through the P-A diagnonalization has been obtained at the prescriptional level. We have found that to eliminate the unphysical vertices due to the P-A diagnonalization, it is sufficient to replace the effective Lagrangian (22) by the Pauli-Villars regularized Lagrangian (33). The regularization is needed because of the nonuniqueness of the calculation of the individual quark diagrams that describe the new interaction vertices. The Pauli-Villars regularization corresponds to subtraction from the quark diagram of a quantity determined by the same diagram but in which all the masses of the virtual quarks are replaced by the masses of the fermions — the regularizers M. Application of the regularization for the complete effective Lagrangian has the consequence that an appropriate contribution of the regularizers is subtracted from any vertex that arises as a result of shift of the axial fields (4). This is sufficient for the correct description of the interaction vertices that arise from the P-A diagonalization.
Keywords
Quark Model Correct Description Interaction Vertex Axial Field Prescriptional LevelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
- 1.S. Gasiorowicz and D. A. Geffen, Rev. Mod. Phys.,41, 531 (1969); M. K. Volkov and V. N. Pervushin, Essentially Nonlinear Quantum Theories, Dynamical Symmetries, and Meson Physics [in Russian], Atomizdat, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
- 2.M. K. Volkov, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),157, 282 (1984); Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra,17, 433 (1986); D. Ebert, A. N. Ivanov, and M. K. Volkov, Fortschr. Phys.,37, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
- 3.Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev.,122, 345 (1961).Google Scholar
- 4.A. Bramon and F. J. Yndurain, Phys. Lett. B,80, 239 (1979).Google Scholar
- 5.S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev.,177, 2426 (1969); J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento A,60, 47 (1969).Google Scholar
- 6.J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B,95, 95 (1971).Google Scholar
- 7.A. N. Ivanov, Yad. Fiz.,33, 1679 (1981); A. N. Ivanov and N. I. Troitskaya, Yad. Fiz.,36, 220 (1982); A. A. Andrianov and Yu. V. Novozhilov, Phys. Lett. B,153, 422 (1985).Google Scholar
- 8.G. Kramer, W. Palmer, and S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. D,30, 89 (1984).Google Scholar
- 9.D. Ebert, A. N. Ivanov, H. Reinhardt, and M. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B,182, 193 (1986).Google Scholar
- 10.M. K. Volkov andA. N. Ivanov, Teor. Mat. Fiz.,69, 156 (1986).Google Scholar
- 11.S. L. Adler, B. W. Lee, and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. D,4, 3497 (1971); M. V. Terent'ev, Phys. Lett. B,38, 419 (1972); R. Aviv and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D,5, 2372 (1972).Google Scholar
- 12.Yu. M. Antipov et al., Phys. Rev. D,36, 36 (1987).Google Scholar
- 13.A. N. Ivanov, M. Nagy, and M. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B,200, 171 (1988).Google Scholar
- 14.A. N. Ivanov, N. I. Troitskaya, and A. K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B,175, 467 (1987);184, 94 (1987); M. K. Volkov and A. N. Ivanov, Yad. Fiz.,44, 1272 (1986); M. K. Volkov, A. N. Ivanov, and N. I. Troitskaya, Yad. Fiz.,47, 1157 (1988).Google Scholar
- 15.A. Monahar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).Google Scholar
- 16.E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B,160, 57 (1979).Google Scholar
- 17.J. Bardeen, L. M. Cooper, and I. R. Schriffer, Phys. Rev.,106, 162 (1957); N. N. Bogolyubov, V. V. Tolmachev, and D. V. Shirkov, A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, New York (1959).Google Scholar
- 18.A. N. Ivanov and V. M. Shekhter, Yad. Fiz.,31, 530 (1980); E. D'Hoker and E. Farhi, Nucl. Phys. B,248, 59, 77 (1984).Google Scholar
- 19.D. Gross, R. Jackiw, and S. Treiman, Lectures on Current Algebra [Russian translation] Atomizdat, Moscow (1977), Lecture 2.Google Scholar