Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 121–151 | Cite as

Gambling as a rational addiction

  • Pamela Mobilia


This paper applies the Becker-Murphy model of rational addiction to gambling and tests the hypotheses of the model empirically using data on pari-mutuel betting at horse tracks from 1950 through 1987. Gambling demand equations which explicitly account for the fact that gambling is an addictive behavior are derived from the Becker-Murphy theoretical model of rational addictive behavior. The effectiveness of changing the takeout rate, the price variable, on gambling behavior, is examined within the addictive framework. Using instrumental variables techniques, gambling demand equations are estimated, with the results supporting the hypothesis of model of rational addictive behavior. In particular, significant inter-temporal linkages are found in gambling consumption, confirming the assumption that gambling is addictive. Future events are found to have a significant impact on current consumption, implying that individuals are not behaving myopically. The long run price elasticities of demand implied by the estimates obtained for the addictive demand equation for handle per attendee is approximately −0.68, significantly larger (by approximately a third) than those obtained from demand equations estimated under the hypothesis of nonaddictive behavior (with an elasticity of −0.454). This reaffirms that the takeout rate is an effective policy instrument for state governments as they set the price of gambling.


Instrumental Variable Policy Instrument Future Event Price Elasticity Variable Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Racing Manual. (1950 through 1988).American racing manual. Hightstown, NJ: The Daily Racing Form, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Barron, J. (1989).New York Times. May 31, 1989. A18.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. & Murphy, K. (1988). A theory of rational addiction,Journal of Political Economy, 96, 675–700.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G., Grossman, M. & Murphy, K. (1990). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3322.Google Scholar
  5. Chaloupka, F.J. (1988).An economic analysis of addictive behavior: The case of cigarette smoking. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chaloupka, F.J. (1990a). Men, women, and addiction: The case of cigarette smoking, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3267.Google Scholar
  7. Chaloupka, F.J. (1990b). Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3268.Google Scholar
  8. Christiansen, E.M. & McQueen, P. (1990a). U.S. gaming up only 6% in '89.Gaming and Wagering Business. 7/15/90, p.1.Google Scholar
  9. Christiansen, E.M. & McQueen, P. (1990b). U.S. gaming win tops $30B.Gaming and Wagering Business. 8/15/90, p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. Gruen, A. (1976). An Inquiry into the economics of race-track gambling,Journal of Political Economy, 84, 169–77.Google Scholar
  11. Gulley, O.D., & Scott, F.A. Jr. (1989). Lottery effects on pari-mutuel tax revenues,National Tax Journal 42, 89–93.Google Scholar
  12. Lesieur, H.R. (1977).The chase: career of the compulsive gambler. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  13. Lesieur, H.R. & Custer, R.L. (1984). Pathological gambling: roots, phases and treatment. In J.H. Frey and W.R. Eadington (Eds.)Annals of the American academy of political and social science, 7, no. 4, Gambling: views from the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Mobilia, P. (1991, September).An economic analysis of gambling as a rational addiction. Paper presented at the New York State Economics Association Meetings, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Morgan, W.D., & Vasche, J.D. (1979). Horseracing demand, pari-mutuel taxation and state revenue potential,National Tax Journal, 32, 185–94.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, W.D. & Vasche, J.D. (1982). A note on the elasticity of demand for wagering,Applied Economics, 14, 469–474, 1982.Google Scholar
  17. New York Times. (1989). From the first meeting to the final penalty (The Pete Rose Case),New York Times. 5/21/89, p. E6(N) col 1.Google Scholar
  18. Pescatrice, D.R. (1980). The inelastic demand for Wagering,Journal of Applied Economics, 12. 1–10.Google Scholar
  19. Suits, D.B. (1979). The elasticity of demand for gambling,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 155–62.Google Scholar
  20. Vescey, G. (1990). The owner who paid a gambler.New York Times, 7/19/90, p. B11(N) col. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Mobilia
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Brooklyn College of the City University of New YorkUSA
  2. 2.National Bureau of Economic ResearchUSA

Personalised recommendations