Assessing privacy invasiveness of psychological test items: Job relevant versus clinical measures of integrity
- 79 Downloads
This pilot study was conducted to determine if clinically-oriented test items are judged to be more offensive than job-related test items. Clinical tests typically ask more personal questions while employment tests usually ask job-relevant questions. A random selection of items from three employment tests was analyzed. Two of the tests evolved from clinical-personality tests, while the third test was designed specifically for employment settings. The results suggest that if companies are interested in using employment tests that are perceived as being job-relevant, inoffensive, and non-invasive, then they should consider selecting tests that include job-relevant items as opposed to tests that are derivatives of clinical assessment instruments.
KeywordsPilot Study Social Psychology Clinical Assessment Social Issue Test Item
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Frost, A.G. & Rafilson, F.M. (1989) Overt integrity versus personality-based measures of delinquency: An empirical comparison.Journal of Business and Psychology, 3(3), 269–277.Google Scholar
- O'Bannon, R.M., Goldinger, L.A., & Appleby, G.S. (1989).Honesty and integrity testing: A practical guide. Atlanta, GA: Applied Information Resources.Google Scholar
- Jones, J.W. (1990) Preemployment testing and job applicants' privacy rights.Journal of Staffing and Recruitment, Summer Issue, 56–60.Google Scholar
- Jones, J.W., Ash, P. & Soto, C. (1990) Employment privacy rights and preemployment honesty tests.Employee Relations Law Journal, 15(4), 561–575.Google Scholar
- Jones, J.W., Ash, P., Soto, C. & Terris, W. (1990) An occasion for invasion?Security Management, Summer Issue, 68–72.Google Scholar