Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1577–1589 | Cite as

How contact foraging experiences affect preferences for host-related odors in the larval parasitoidCotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

  • Ted C. J. Turlings
  • J. W. A. Scheepmaker
  • L. E. M. Vet
  • J. H. Tumlinson
  • W. J. Lewis
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Responses of individual females of the parasitoidCotesia marginiventris to the odors of four different complexes of host larvae feeding on leaves were observed in a four-arm olfactometer. The plant-host complexes were composed of fall armyworm (FAW) larvae or cabbage looper (CL) larvae feeding on either corn or cotton seedlings. Prior to testing, each female was given a brief foraging experience on a plant-host complex and was then exposed to the odors of the same complex in the olfactometer. The experienced females responded to familiar odors in a dose-related manner, and these responses were virtually identical to all four complexes. Preferences for the odors of one of two plant-host complexes were tested in dual choice situations. Generally, FAW odors were preferred over CL odors and corn odors over cotton odors. A short foraging experience significantly affected the females' odor preferences in favor of the odors released by the experienced complex. Additional experiments revealed that neither longer bouts of experience nor bouts that included ovipositions resulted in a stronger change in preference. Experience affected preference in combinations where only the host species was varied as well as in combinations where only the plant species was varied. The results, therefore, strongly indicate that both the plants and the hosts somehow are involved in the production and/or release of the semiochemicals that attractC. marginiventris.

Key Words

Hymenoptera Braconidae Cotesia marginiventris host-finding semiochemicals conditioning 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alphen, J.J.M. van, andVet, L.E.M. 1986. An evolutionary approach to host finding and selection, pp. 23–61,in J.K. Waage and D.J. Greathead (eds.). Insect Parasitoids. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, A.P. 1971. Associative learning byNemeritis canescens (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Can. Entomol. 103:1137–1141.Google Scholar
  3. Ashley, T.R. 1986. Geographical distribution and parasitization levels for parasitoids of the fall armyworm,Spodoptera frugiperda.Fla. Entomol. 69:516–524.Google Scholar
  4. Dmoch, J., Lewis, W.J. Martin, P.B., andNordlund, D.A. 1985. Role of the host-produced stimuli and learning in host selection behavior ofCotesia (=Apanteles)marginiventris (Cresson).J. Chem. Ecol. 11:453–463.Google Scholar
  5. Drost, Y.C., Lewis, W.J., Zanen, P.O., andKeller, M.A. 1986. Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. I. Flight behavior and influence of preflight handling ofMicroplitis croceipes (Cresson).J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1247–1262.Google Scholar
  6. Eller, F.J., Tumlinson, J.H., andLewis, W.J. 1988. Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. II. Olfactometric studies of host-location by the parasitoidMicroplitis croceipes (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:425–434.Google Scholar
  7. King, E.G., andLeppla, N.C. 1981. Advances and Challenges in Insect Rearing. Agric. Res. Serv., USDA, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, W.J., andBurton, R.L. 1970. RearingMicroplitis in the laboratory withHeliothis zea as hosts.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:656–658.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, W.J., andNordlund, D.A. 1985. Behavior-modifying chemicals to enhance natural enemy effectiveness, pp. 89–101,in M.A. Hoy and D.C. Herzog (eds.). Biological Control in Agricultural IPM Systems. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, W.J., andTumlinson, J.H. 1988. Host detection by chemically mediated associative learning in a parasitic wasp.Nature 331:257–259.Google Scholar
  11. Monteith, L.G. 1963. Habituation and associative learning inDrino bohemica Mesn. (Diptera: Tachinidae).Can. Entomol. 95:418–426.Google Scholar
  12. Sandlan, K. 1980. Host location byCoccygomimus turionellae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27:233–245.Google Scholar
  13. Sas Institute 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina. 1028 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Strand, M.R., andVinson, S.B. 1982. Behavioral response of the parasitoidCardiochiles nigriceps to a kairomone.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 31:309–315.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, R.J. 1974. Role of learning in insect parasitism.Ecol. Monogr. 44:89–104.Google Scholar
  16. Thorpe, W.H. andJones, F.G.W. 1937. Olfactory conditioning and its relation to the problem of host selection.Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 134:56–81.Google Scholar
  17. Turlings, T.C.J., Tumlinson, J.H., Lewis, W.J., andVet, L.E.M. 1989. Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. VIII Learning of host-related odors induced by a brief contact experience with host by-products inCotesia marginiventris, a generalist larval parasitoid.J. Insect Behav. 2:217–225.Google Scholar
  18. Vet, L.E.M. 1983. Host-habitat location through olfactory cues byLeptopilina clavipes (Hartig) (Hym.: Eucoilidae), a parasitoid of fungivorousDrosophila: The influence of conditioning.Neth. J. Zool. 33:225–248.Google Scholar
  19. Vet, L.E.M. 1988. The influence of learning on habitat location and acceptance by parasitoids,In. Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Insect Parasitoids.Colloq. INRA 48:29–34.Google Scholar
  20. Vet, L.E.M., andVan Opzeeland, K. 1984. The influence of conditioning on olfactory micro-habitat and host location inAsobara tabida (Ness) andA. rufescens (Foerster) (Braconidae: Alysiinae), larval parasitoids of Drosophilidae.Oecologia 63:171–177.Google Scholar
  21. Vet, L.E.M., andVan Opzeeland, K. 1985. Olfactory microhabitat selection inLeptopilina heterotoma (Thomson) (Hym.: Eucoilidae), a parasitoid of Drosophilidae.Neth. J. Zool. 35:497–504.Google Scholar
  22. Vet, L.E.M., Van Lenteren, J.C., Heijmans, M., andMeelis, E. 1983. An airflow olfactometer for measuring olfactory responses of hymenopterous parasitoids and other small insects.Physiol. Entomol. 8:97–106.Google Scholar
  23. Vinson, S.B. 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21:109–133.Google Scholar
  24. Vinson, S.B., 1981. Habitat location, pp. 51–77,in D.A. Nordlund, R.L. Jones, and W.J. Lewis, (eds.). Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Vinson, S.B. 1984. Parasitoid-host relationship, pp. 205–233,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Sinauer Associates Inc., Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  26. Vinson, S.B., Barfield, C.S., andHenson, R.D. 1977. Oviposition behaviour ofBracon mellitor, a parasitoid of the boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). II. Associative learning.Physiol. Entomol. 2:157–164.Google Scholar
  27. Wardle, A.R., andBorden, J.H. 1985. Age-dependent associative learning byExeristes roborator (F.) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Can. Entomol. 117:605–616.Google Scholar
  28. Weseloh, R.M. 1981. Host location by parasitoids, pp. 79–95,in D.A. Nordlund, R.L. Jones, and W.J. Lewis, (eds.). Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted C. J. Turlings
    • 1
  • J. W. A. Scheepmaker
    • 1
  • L. E. M. Vet
    • 1
  • J. H. Tumlinson
    • 1
  • W. J. Lewis
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Department of AgricultureInsect Attractants, Behavior, and Basic Biology Research Laboratory Agricultural Research ServiceGainesville

Personalised recommendations