Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 1343–1349 | Cite as

Effects of monoterpene odors on food selection by red deer calves (Cervus elaphus)

  • Stephen Elliott
  • Andrew Loudon


The response of red deer calves (Cervus elaphus) to the odors of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and lodgepole pine (Pinus conforta) needles and five monoterpene constituents of their essential oils was measured by simple two-choice feeding trials. All odors were significantly rejected (P < 0.05) except Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine by females and Sitka spruce and alpha-terpineol by males. Females had a stronger dislike of all odors except lodgepole pine than males. Rejection of monoterpene odors weakened slightly with time. A strong logarithmic relationship between the strength of the rejection response and vapor pressure of the compounds tested suggested that the odors were rejected on the basis of concentration rather than quality.

Key words

Cervus elaphus red deer terpenoids monoterpenes olfaction Picea sitchensis Pinus conforta 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, G.W., andHill, J.L. 1972. Chemical factors affecting selection of food plants by ruminants, pp. 71–101,in J.B. Harbourne (ed.). Phytochemical Ecology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, G.W., De Boer, E.S., andBoundy, C.A.P. 1980. The influence of odour and taste on the food preferences and food intake of sheep.Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31:571–587.Google Scholar
  3. Conolly, G.E., Ellison, B.O., Fleming, J.W., Geng, S., Kepner, R.E., Longhurst, W.M., Oh, J.H., andRussell, G.F. 1980. Deer browsing of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees in relation to volatile terpene composition and in vitro fermentability.For. Sci. 26(2):179–193.Google Scholar
  4. Doty, R.L., Shaman, P., andDann, M. 1984. Development of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function.Physiol. Behav. 32:489–502.Google Scholar
  5. Jordan, T.E. 1954. Vapor Pressures of Organic Compounds. Interscience Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Kruska, D., andStephan, H. 1973. Volumenvergleich allokortikaler Hirnzentren bei Wild und Hausschwein.Acta Anat. 84:387–415.Google Scholar
  7. Longhurst, W.M.,Oh, H.K.,Jones, M.B., andKepner, R.E. 1968. A basis for the palatibility of deer forage plants. 33rd North American Wildlife Conference, pp. 181–192.Google Scholar
  8. Nagy, J.G., Steinhoff, H.W., andWard, G.M. 1964. Effects of essential oils of sagebrush on deer rumen microbial function.J. Wildl. Manage. 28(4):785–790.Google Scholar
  9. Narjisse, H. 1981. The acceptability of big sagebrush to sheep and goats: Role of monoterpenes. PhD thesis. Utah State University.Google Scholar
  10. Oh, H.K., Sakai, T., Jones, M.B., andLonghurst, W.M. 1967. Effects of various essential oils isolated from Douglas-fir needles upon sheep and deer rumen activity.Appl. Microbiol. 15(4):777–784.Google Scholar
  11. Oh, J.H., Jones, M.B., Longhurst, W.M., andConnolly, G.E. 1970. Deer browsing and rumen microbial fermentation as affected by fertilization and growth stage.For. Sci. 16:21–27.Google Scholar
  12. Ottoson, D. 1963. Some aspects of the function of the olfactory system.Pharmacol. Rev. 15:1–42.Google Scholar
  13. Painter, W.W. 1971. Volatile oil content and consumption of juniper and its effects on deer rumen microbes. MSc thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 40 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Radwan, M.A. 1972. Differences between Douglas-fir genotypes in relation to browsing preference by black-tailed deer.Can. J. For. Res. 2:250–255.Google Scholar
  15. Rice, P. R., andChurch, D.C. 1974. Taste responses of deer to browse extracts, organic acids and odors.J. Wildl. Manage. 38(4):830–836.Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, C.C., Nagy, J.G., andRegelin, W.L. 1980a. Juniper oil yield, terpinoid concentration and antimicrobial effects on deer.J. Wildl. Manage. 44:107–113.Google Scholar
  17. Schwartz, C.C., Regelin, W.L., andNagy, J.G. (1980b). Deer preference for juniper forage and volatile oil treated foods.J. Wildl. Manage. 44:114–120.Google Scholar
  18. Stoddart, D.M. (1980).The Ecology of Vertebrate Olfaction. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Tribe, D.E. (1949). The importance of the sense of smell to grazing sheep.J. Agric. Sci. Cambr. 39:309–311.Google Scholar
  20. Welch, B.L. andPederson, J.C. (1981).In-vitro digestibility among accessions of big sagebrush by wild mule deer and its relationship to monoterpinoid content.J. Range Manage. 34:380–384.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Elliott
    • 1
  • Andrew Loudon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesEdinburgh UniversityScotland EH9 3JU, UK
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologyRegent's ParkUK

Personalised recommendations