Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 903–919 | Cite as

Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores

I. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus)
  • Thomas P. Sullivan
  • Lance O. Nordstrom
  • Druscilla S. Sullivan


The effectiveness of predator odors (fecal, urine, and anal scent gland) in suppressing feeding damage by snowshoe hares was investigated in pen bioassays at the University of British Columbia Research Forest, Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada. A total of 28 bioassay trials tested the effects of these odors on hare consumption of willow browse and coniferous seedlings. Lynx and bobcat feces, weasel anal gland secretion, and lynx, bobcat, wolf, coyote, fox, and wolverine urines resulted in the most effective suppression of hare feeding damage. Novel odors of domestic dog urine and 2-methylbutyric acid did not reduce feeding. A field bioassay with lodgepole pine seedlings and weasel scent provided significant results comparable to the pen bioassays. The short-term (up to seven days) effectiveness of these treatments was more likely due to evaporative loss of the active repellent components of a given odor than habituation of hares to the stimulus. Predator odors as repellents have a biological basis compared with the anthropomorphic origins of commercial repellents. When encapsulated in weather-proof controlled-release devices, these odors could provide long-term protection for forestry plantations and agricultural crops which experience hare/rabbit feeding damage.

Key words

Bioassays conifer seedlings crop protection feeding activity herbivores Lepus americanus predator odors repellent snowshoe hare 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albone, E.S., Eglinton, G., Walker, J.M., andWare, G.C. 1974. The anal sac secretion of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes); its chemistry and microbiology. A comparison with the anal sac secretion of the lion, (Panthera leo).Life Sci. 14:387–400.Google Scholar
  2. Albone, E.S., andPerry, G.L. 1976. Anal sac secretion of the red fox,Vulpes vulpes; volatile fatty acids and amines: Implications for a fermentation hypothesis.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:101–111.Google Scholar
  3. Banfield, A.W.F. 1974. The Mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Ontario.Google Scholar
  4. Bolles, R.C. 1970. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychol. Rev. 77:32–48.Google Scholar
  5. Boonstra, R., Rodd, F.H., andCarleton, D.J. 1982. Effect ofBlarina brevicauda on trap response ofMicrotus pennsylvanicus.Can. J. Zool. 60:438–442.Google Scholar
  6. Brand, C.J., andKeith, L.B. 1979. Lynx demography during a snowshoe hare decline in Alberta.J. Wildl. Manage. 43:827–849.Google Scholar
  7. Bronson, F.H. 1971. Rodent pheromones.Biol. Reprod. 4:344–357.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, W.L., Eisner, T., andWhittaker, R.H. 1970. Allomones and kairomones, transspecific chemical messengers.Bioscience 20:21–22.Google Scholar
  9. Bullard, R.W., andShumake, S.A. 1977. Food base flavour additive improves bait acceptance by ricefield rats.J. Wildl. Manage. 41:290–297.Google Scholar
  10. Cattarelli, M., andChanel, R. 1979. Influence of some biologically meaningful odorants on the vigilance states of the rat.Physiol. Behav. 23:831–838.Google Scholar
  11. Chael, M.L., andSprott, R.L. 1971. Social olfaction: A review of the role of olfaction in a variety of animal behaviors.Psychol. Rep. 29:195–243.Google Scholar
  12. Christiansen, E., andDoving, K. 1975. Pheromones in small rodents, pp. 221–227,in L. Hansson and B. Nilsson (eds.). Occurrence and Supposed Usefulness in Biological Control. Biocontrol of Rodents. Swedish Natural Science Research Council, Ecological Bulletin No. 19.Google Scholar
  13. Crump, D.R. 1978. 2-Propylthietane, a major malodorous substance from the anal gland of the stoat (Mustela erminea).Tetrahedron Lett. 52:5233–5234.Google Scholar
  14. Crump, D.R. 1980. Thietanes and dithiolanes from the anal gland of the stoat (Mustela erminea).J. Chem. Ecol. 6:341–347.Google Scholar
  15. Dodge, W.E., Loveless, C.M., andKverno, N.B. 1967. Design and analysis of forest-mammal repellent tests.For. Sci. 13:333–336.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenberg, J.F., andKleiman, D.G. 1972. Olfactory communication in mammals.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:1–32.Google Scholar
  17. Henessy, D.F., andOwings, D.H. 1978. Snake species discrimination and the role of olfactory cues in the snake-directed behavior of the California ground squirrel.Behaviour 65:116–124.Google Scholar
  18. Hinde, R.A., andStevenson-Hinde, J. 1973. Constraints on Learning. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  19. Keith, L.B., andWindberg, L. A. 1978. A demographic analysis of the snowshoe hare cycle.Wildl. Monogr. 58.Google Scholar
  20. Krajina, V.J. 1969. Ecology of forest trees in British Columbia.Ecol. West. North Am. 2:1–147.Google Scholar
  21. Lehner, P.N., Krumm, R., andCringan, A.T. 1976. Tests for olfactory repellents for coyotes and dogs.J. Wildl. Manage. 40:145–150.Google Scholar
  22. Lichtenstein, P.E. 1950. Studies of anxiety: I. The production of a feeding inhibition in dogs.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 43:16–29.Google Scholar
  23. Lockley, R.M. 1964. The Private Life of the Rabbit. Transworld, London.Google Scholar
  24. Mech, D.L. 1977. Wolf pack buffer zones as prey reservoirs.Science 198:320–321.Google Scholar
  25. Mech, D.L., andPeters, R.P. 1977. The study of chemical communication in free-ranging mammals, pp. 321–332,in D. Muller-Schwarze and M. Mozell (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Müller-Schwarze, D. 1972. Responses of young black-tailed deer to predator odors.J. Mammal. 53:393–394.Google Scholar
  27. Müller-Schwarze, D. 1974. Olfactory recognition of species, groups, individuals and physiological states among mammals, pp. 316–326,in M.C. Birch (ed.). Pheromones. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  28. Müller-Schwarze, D. 1983. Scent glands in mammals and their functions, pp. 150–197,in J.F. Eisenberg and D.G. Kleiman (eds.). Advances in the Study of Mammalian Behavior. Special Publication No. 7, American Society of Mammalogists.Google Scholar
  29. Preti, G., Muetterties, E.L., Fruman, J., Kenelly, J.J., andJohns, B.E. 1976. Volatile constituents of dog (Canis familiaris) and coyote (Canis latrans) anal sacs.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:177–187.Google Scholar
  30. Ralls, K. 1971. Mammalian scent marking.Science 171:443–449.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, L.L., Mech, L.D., Dawson, D.K., Peek, J.M., andKorb, M. 1980. Deer distribution in relation to wolf pack territory edges.J. Wildl. Manage. 44:253–258.Google Scholar
  32. Seward, J.P., andRaskin, D.C. 1960. The role of fear in aversive behavior.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 53:328–335.Google Scholar
  33. Shumake, A.A. 1977. The search for applications of chemical signals in wildlife management, pp. 357–376,in D. Müller-Schwarze and M. Mozell (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Solomon, R.L., andWynne, L.C. 1953. Traumatic avoidance learning: Acquisition in normal dogs.Psychol. Monogr. 67:1–19.Google Scholar
  35. Stoddart, D.M. 1976. Effect of the odour of weasels (Mustela nivalis L.) on trapped samples of their prey.Oecologia 22:439–441.Google Scholar
  36. Stoddart, D.M. 1980a. The Ecology of Vertebrate Olfaction. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  37. Stoddart, D.M. 1980b. Some responses of a free-living community of rodents to the odors of predators, pp. 1–10,in D. Müller-Schwarze and B.M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals: Vertebrates and Aquatic Invertebrates. Plenum Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Stoddart, D.M. 1982. Does trap odor influence estimation of population size of the short-tailed vole,Microtus agrestis?J. Anim. Ecol. 51:375–386.Google Scholar
  39. Sullivan, T.P. 1984. Effects of snowshoe hare damage on juvenile lodgepole pine—implications for spacing natural stands. Research Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria. Research Note. 94. p. 27.Google Scholar
  40. Sullivan, T.P., andCrump, D.R. 1984. Influence of mustelid scent gland compounds on suppression of feeding by snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1809–1821.Google Scholar
  41. Sullivan, T.P., andSullivan, D-S. 1982. Barking damage by snowshoe hares and red squirrels in lodgepole pine stands in central British Columbia.Can. J. For. Res. 12:443–448.Google Scholar
  42. Todd, A.W., Keith, L.B., andFischer, C.A. 1981. Population ecology of coyotes during a fluctuation of snowshoe hares.J. Wildl. Manage. 45:629–640.Google Scholar
  43. Whittaker, R.H., andFeeny, P.P. 1971. Allelochemics: Chemical interaction between species.Science 171:757–770.Google Scholar
  44. Vernet-Maury, E., Polak, E.H., andDemael, A. 1984. Structure-activity relationship of stressinducing odorants in the rat.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1007–1018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas P. Sullivan
    • 1
  • Lance O. Nordstrom
    • 1
  • Druscilla S. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Mammal Research InstituteLangleyCanada

Personalised recommendations