Negotiation Journal

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 303–317 | Cite as

Judgmental limitations in diplomatic negotiations

  • Max H. Bazerman
  • Harris Sondak
In Theory


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Afshar, H. (1985). “The Iranian theocracy.” InIran: A revolution in turmoil ed. H. Afshar. Albany, N.Y.: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, G. T. (1971).Essence of decision. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bazerman, M. H. (1983). “Negotiator judgment: A critical look at the rationality assumption.”American Behavioral Scientist 27: 618–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —— (1986).Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Bazerman, M. H., andCarroll, J. S. (1987). “Negotiator cognition.”Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9, ed. B. Staw and L. L. Cummings. Greenwich. Conn: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bazerman, M. H., Giuliano, T., andAppleman, A. (1984). “Escalation in individual and group decision making.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazerman, M. H., andNeale, M. A. (1982). “Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration: The role of selection and training.”Journal of Applied Psychology 67: 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bies, R.J. (under review). “The justification of bad news: A managerial strategy for liability reduction.”Google Scholar
  9. Brams, S.J. (1985).Superpower games. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brockner, J., andRubin, J. Z. (1985).Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, J. C., Bazerman, M. H., andMaury, R. (in press). “Negotiator cognitions: A descriptive approach to negotiators' understanding of their opponents.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.Google Scholar
  12. Einhorn, H. J., andHogarth, R. M. (1978). “Confidence in judgment: Persistence in the illusion of validity.”Psychological Review 85: 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischhoff, B. (1981). “Debiasing.” InJudgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases eds. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holsti, O. (1976). “Foreign policy viewed cognitively.” InStructure of decision ed. R. Axelrod. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Janis, I. L. (1976).Groupthink: Psychological studies in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jervis, R. (1976).Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. ——. (1982/83). “Deterrence and perception.”International Security 7 (winter): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. andTversky, A. eds. (1982).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kahneman, D., andTversky, A. (1979). “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.”Econometrica 47: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D., andTversky, A. (1984). “Choices, values, and frames.”American Psychologist 39: 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kifner, J. (1981). “How a sit-in turned into a siege.”New York Times Magazine 17 May 1981, p. 63.Google Scholar
  22. Lebow, R. N. (1981).Between peace and war: The nature of international crisis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. —— (1985). “Miscalculation in the South Atlantic: Origins of the Falklands war.” InPsychology and Deterrence eds. R. Jervis, R. N. Lebow, and J. G. Stein. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. —— (1987).Nuclear crisis management: A dangerous illusion. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lebow, R. N., andStein, J. G. (1987). “Beyond deterrence.”Journal of Social Issues 43: 5–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neale, M. A. (1984). “The effect of negotiation and arbitration cost salience on bargainer behavior: The role of the arbitrator and constituency on negotiator judgment.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 34: 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raiffa, H. (1982).The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rubin, J. (1980). “Experimental research on third party intervention in conflict: Toward some generalizations.”Psychological Bulletin 87: 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rubin, J., andBrown, B. (1975).The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Samuelson, W. F., andBazerman, M. H. (1985). “Negotiating under the winner's curse.” InResearch in Experimental Economics, vol. 3, ed V. Smith. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schelling, T. C. (1960).The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Shubik, M. (1971). “The dollar auction game: A paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 15: 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shubik, M. (1982).Game theory in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sick, G. (1985).All fall down. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Siegal, S., andFouraker, L. E. (1960).Bargaining and group decision making: Experiments in bilateral monopoly New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, V. (1982). “Microeconomic systems and an experimental science.”American Economic Review 72: 923–955.Google Scholar
  37. Snyder, G. H., andDiesing, P. (1977).Conflict among nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Staw, B. M. (1976). “Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. —— (1981). “The escalation of commitment to a course of action.”Academy of Management Review 6: 577–587.Google Scholar
  40. Staw, B. M. andRoss, J. (1980). “Commitment in an experimenting society: An experiment on the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios.”Journal of Applied Psychology 65: 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sullivan, W. H. (1981).Mission to Iran. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  42. Teger, A. I. (1980).Too much invested to quit: The psychology of the escalation of conflict. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tversky, A., andKahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.”Science 185: 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. —— (1986). “Rational choice and the framing of decisions.”Journal of Business 59: 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ury, W. L., andSmoke, R. (1984). “Beyond the hotline: Controlling a nuclear crisis.” Washington, D. C.: U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.Google Scholar
  46. Vance, C. (1983).Hard choices. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  47. Weiner, S. B., Bazerman, M. H., andCarroll, J. C. (1988). “An evaluation of learning in the bilateral winner's curse.” Evanston, Ill.: Working paper, Dispute Resolution Research Center, Northwestern University, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max H. Bazerman
  • Harris Sondak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations