The Histochemical Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 763–779

The effect of different fixatives on chromatin: Cytochemical and ultrastructural approaches

  • A. Fraschini
  • C. Pellicciari
  • M. Biggiogera
  • M. G. Manfredi Romanini
Reviews and Papers


This study explores the effects of two types of fixative on chromatin. The first type (acrolein, glutaraldehyde) engenders a high degree of ultrastructural preservation. The other type are fixatives that are widely used in cytochemistry and cytogenetics (acetic acid, 3∶1 by vol. methanol-acetic acid, methanol alone, formaldehyde).

Lymphocytes of adult rats so-fixedin vitro were prepared for electron microscopy or microdensitometric evaluations of smears. Assessments were made of variations in their total protein, nuclear basic protein and DNA contents. DNA was determined both as Feulgen-positive material and by its binding of intercalating dyes (Methyl Green, specific for double-stranded polynucleotides).

Our results showed that some fixatives break up the chromatin organization by acting on particular components of chromatin fibres. They can thus be considered to be destructive agentsin situ. In addition, a revaluation of some aldehyde fixatives is proposed for both ultrastructural and cytochemical research.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bedi, K. S. &Goldstein, D. J. (1974) Cytophotometric factors causing apparent differences between Feulgen-DNA content of different leukocytes types.Nature, Lond. 251, 439–40.Google Scholar
  2. Bernhard, W. (1969) A new staining procedure for electron microscopical cytology.J. Ultrastruct. Res. 27, 250–65.Google Scholar
  3. Böyum, A. (1964) Separation of white blood cells.Nature, Lond. 204, 793–94.Google Scholar
  4. Bowes, J. H. &Cater, C. W. (1966) The reaction of glutaraldehyde with proteins and other biological materials.J. R. microsc. Soc. 85, 193–200.Google Scholar
  5. Brody, T. (1974) Histones in cytological preparations.Expl Cell. Res. 101, 255–63.Google Scholar
  6. Diaz, M. (1972) Methyl Green staining and highly repetitive DNA in polytene chromosomes.Chromosoma 37, 131–8.Google Scholar
  7. Dick, C. &Johns, W. (1968) The effect of two acetic acid containing fixatives on the histone content of calf thymus deoxyribonuclearprotein and calf thymus tissue.Expl Cell Res. 51, 626–32.Google Scholar
  8. Fraschini, A. &Marinozzi, V. (1977) Critical analysis of the use of the acrolein-Schiff method as a possible DNA reaction.Histochemistry 50, 197–206.Google Scholar
  9. Fraschini, A., Bolchi, F. &Biggiogera, M. (1980) Ultrastructural cytotopochemistry of chromatin: approaches via destructive deproteinizing.J. submicrosc. Cytol. 12, 121–36.Google Scholar
  10. Gaub, J. (1976) Feulgen-Naphthol Yellow S cytophotometry of liver cells.Histochemistry 49, 293–301.Google Scholar
  11. Haselkorn, R. &Doty, P. (1961) The reaction of formaldehyde with polynucleotides.J. Biol. Chem. 236, 2738–45.Google Scholar
  12. Hayat, M. A. (1970)Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy. Vol. 1. pp. 35–107. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  13. Hopwood, D. (1968) Some aspects of fixation by glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde.J. Anat., Lond. 103, 581–89.Google Scholar
  14. Itikawa, O. &Ogura, Y. (1954) The Feulgen reaction after hydrolysis at room temperature.Stain. Technol. 29, 237–49.Google Scholar
  15. Kiefer, R., Kiefer, G. &Sandritter, W. (1972) Feulgenhidrolyse kinetic in eu- und eterochromatin.Histochemie 30, 150–5.Google Scholar
  16. Kjellstrand, P. T. T. &Anderssen, G. K. A. (1975) Histochemical properties of spermatozoa and somatic cells. I: Relations between Feulgen hydrolysis pattern and the composition of the nucleoproteins.Histochem. J. 7, 563–73.Google Scholar
  17. Le Boutellier, P., Kinsky, R., Vujanovic, N., Duc, H. &Voisin, G. (1976) Morphological differences between thymus and bone marrow derived lymphocytes.Differentiation 6, 125–41.Google Scholar
  18. Le Boutellier, P., Kinsky, R., Righenzi, S. &Voisin, G. (1978) Electron microscopic study of thymus and bone marrow derived mouse lymphocytes.Ann. Immun. 129, 635–51.Google Scholar
  19. Luft, J. (1959) The use of acrolein as a fixative for light and electron microscopy.Anat. Rec. 133, 305–12.Google Scholar
  20. Manfrediromanini, M. G., Formenti, D., Fraschini, A., Pellicciari, C., Redi, C. A. &Scherini, E. (1981) Some parameters for a cell cycle cytotopochemical study.Gegenbaurs morphol. Jahrb., Leipzig 127, 581–7.Google Scholar
  21. Marinozzi, V. (1963) The role of fixation in electron staining.J. R. microsc. Soc. 81, 141–54.Google Scholar
  22. Mayall, B. (1966) The detection of small differences in DNA content with microspectrophotometric techniques.J. Cell Biol. 31, 74A.Google Scholar
  23. Mayall, B. &Mendelsohn, M. (1967) Chromatin and chromosome compaction and the stoichiometry of DNA staining.J. Cell Biol. 35, 88A.Google Scholar
  24. Mayall, B. (1969) Deoxyribonucleic acid cytophotometry of stained human leukocytes. I. Differences among cell types.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 17, 249–57.Google Scholar
  25. Millonig, G. &Marinozzi, V. (1968) Fixation and embedding in electron microscopy. InAdvances in Optical and Electron Microscopy (edited byBarer, R. &Cosslett, V.) Vol. 2. pp. 251–341. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mittermayer, C., Madreiter, H., Lederer, B. &Sandritter, W. (1971) Differential acid hydrolysis of euchromatin and heterochromatin.Beitr. Path. 143, 157–65.Google Scholar
  27. Nicolini, C. (1979)Chromatin structure and function. Vol. A. pp. 293–322. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  28. Olins, D. &Wright, E. (1973) Glutaraldehyde fixation of isolated eucaryotic nuclei.J. Cell Biol. 59, 304–17.Google Scholar
  29. Pellicciari, C., Manfredi Romanini, M. G., Casirola, G., Ippoliti, G. & Marini, G. (1976) Hydrolysis kinetics studies of the Feulgen reaction on different lymphocyte populations in man.Fifth Int. Congr. Histochem. Cytochem., Bucharest.Google Scholar
  30. Pellicciari, C. &Fraschini, A. (1978) Methods of denaturation and renaturation of DNA in interphasic chromatin: cytochemical quantitative analysis by Methyl Green staining.Histochem. J. 10, 213–22.Google Scholar
  31. Rasch, R. &Rasch, E. (1973) Kinetics of hydrolysis during the Feulgen reaction for deoxyribonucleic acid. A re-evaluation.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 1053–65.Google Scholar
  32. Retief, A. &Rüchel, R. (1977) Histones removed by fixation. Their role in the mechanism of chromosomal banding.Expl. Cell Res. 106, 233–7.Google Scholar
  33. Reynolds, E. (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy.J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–13.Google Scholar
  34. Sabatini, D., Bensch, K. &Barrnett, R. (1962) New means of fixation for electron microscopy and histochemistry.Anat. Rec. 142, 274–90.Google Scholar
  35. Sabatini, D., Bensch, K. &Barrnett, R. (1963) Cytochemistry and electron microscopy: the preservation of the cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation.J. Cell Biol. 17, 19–58.Google Scholar
  36. Sabatini, D., Miller, F. &Barrnett, R. (1964) Aldehyde fixation for morphological and enzyme histochemical studies with the electron microscope.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 12, 57–71.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, J. (1967) On the mechanism of the Methyl Green-pyronine stain for nucleic acids.Histochemie 9, 30–46.Google Scholar
  38. Stollar, D. &Grossman, L. (1962) The reaction of formaldehyde with denatured DNA: spectrophotometric, immunologic and enzymic studies.J. molec. Biol. 4, 31–8.Google Scholar
  39. Sumner, A., Evans, H. &Buckland, R. (1973) Mechanism involved in the banding of chromosomes with Quinacrine and Giemsa. I. The effects of fixation in methanol-acetic acid.Expl. Cell Res. 81, 214–22.Google Scholar
  40. Trump, B. F. &Ericsson, J. L. (1965) The effect of the fixative solution on the ultrastructure of cells and tissues. A comparative analysis with particular attention to the proximal convoluted tubule of the rat kidney.Lab. Invest. 14, 1245–51.Google Scholar
  41. Trump, B. F. &Bulger, R. E. (1966) New ultrastructural characteristics of cells fixed in a glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide mixture.Lab. Invest. 15, 368–79.Google Scholar
  42. Van Duijn, P. (1961) Acrolein-Schiff: a new staining method for proteins.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 9, 234–41.Google Scholar
  43. Zetterberg, A. &Auer, G. (1969) Early changes in the binding between DNA and histones in human leukocytes exposed to phytoemagglutinin.Exp. Cell Res. 56, 122–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Fraschini
    • 1
  • C. Pellicciari
    • 1
  • M. Biggiogera
    • 1
  • M. G. Manfredi Romanini
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Istologia, Embriologia e AntropologiaUniversità di Pavia and Centro di Studio per l'Istochimica del CNRPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations